networkstack-aidl-interfaces-*java has explicit apex_available now.
Accordingly, remove it from the whitelist
Bug: 133526962
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: If5427afb2470a7dffbd418e1c405af508577ad93
Merged-In: If5427afb2470a7dffbd418e1c405af508577ad93
Shared lib dependencies of a test is included in the APEX regardless of
whether the test has test_per_srcs or not.
Bug: N/A
Test: m (apex_test.go amended)
Change-Id: I6b16843cc7467c42e250aba88d79d5580ba47324
The first component is the apex name, or a special name "platform"
if the boot jar is a platform jar rather than a part of some apex.
This is a prerequisite change for moving core-icu4j to a separate
com.android.i18n apex.
Old one-column format is still supported, but all unqualified
components of PRODUCT_BOOT_JARS get "platform:" prepended to them
after reading the product makefiles.
Test: aosp_walleye-userdebug boots
Bug: 138994281
Change-Id: Ic229159fdcdaf6182210a53b63850a389dd786fc
runtime_resource_overlay is put to an APEX via 'apps' property. It is
placed under ./overlay directory in it.
Bug: 154822536
Test: m
Change-Id: I8edf4a26c26368c52fb7b327b2ecc829f21ea148
This change adds 'test_for' property to cc_test_* types. The property is
used to mark a module as a test for one or more APEXes, in which case
the module has accecss to the private part of the listed APEXes. For
example, the module is linked with the actrual shared library in the
APEX instead of the stub of the shared library.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from AOSP
Bug: 129539670
Bug: 153046163
Test: m
Merged-In: I45ed0d7a15540b0d69b2a3b8d9c4cb202adff6f2
(cherry picked from commit 62304bbeec)
Change-Id: I45ed0d7a15540b0d69b2a3b8d9c4cb202adff6f2
The marked library(ies) were available to the APEXes via the
hand-written whitelist in build/soong/apex/apex.go. Trying to remove the
whitelist by adding apex_available property to the Android.bp of the
libraries.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from AOSP
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Merged-In: I11a4e877ee27f7c55e2f00371c6fa58daedb1a9f
(cherry picked from commit 601d31c234)
Change-Id: I11a4e877ee27f7c55e2f00371c6fa58daedb1a9f
A module is marked unavailable for platform when 1) it does not have
"//apex_available:platform" in its apex_available property, or 2)
it depends on another module that is unavailable for platform.
In that case, LOCAL_NOT_AVAILABLE_FOR_PLATFORM is set to true for the
module in the Make world. Later, that flag is used to ensure that there
is no module with the flag is installed to the device.
The reason why this isn't entirely done in Soong is because Soong
doesn't know if a module will be installed to the device or not. To
explain this, let's have an example.
cc_test { name: "mytest", static_libs: ["libfoo"]}
cc_library_static { name: "libfoo", static_libs: ["libbar"]}
cc_library { name: "libbar", apex_available: ["com.android.xxx"]}
Here, libbar is not available for platform, but is used by libfoo which
is available for platform (apex_available defaults to
"//apex_available:platform"). libfoo is again depended on by mytest
which again is available for platform. The use of libbar should be
allowed in the context of test; we don't want to make libbar available
to platform just for the dependency from test because it will allow
non-test uses of the library as well.
Soong by itself can't tell whether libfoo and libbar are used only in the
context of a test. There could be another module depending them, e.g.,
cc_library_shared { name: "mylib", static_libs: ["libfoo"] }
can exist and it might be installed to the device, in which case
we really should trigger an error.
Since Make has the knowledge of what's installed and what's not,
the check should be done there.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from AOSP
Bug: 153073816
Test: m
Test: remove "//apex_available:platform" from libmdnssd (it is currently
installed to /system/lib), and check that `m system_image` fails
Merged-In: Ia304cc5f41f173229e8a154e90cea4dce46dcebe
(cherry picked from commit 89e850ab84)
Change-Id: Ia304cc5f41f173229e8a154e90cea4dce46dcebe
Compiling native modules against the NDK disables platform features
like ASAN. For anything shipped on the system image there is no
reason to compile against the NDK. Add a new mutator to Soong that
creates a platform and an SDK variant for modules that set
sdk_version, and ignore sdk_version for the platform variant. The
SDK variant will be used for embedding in APKs that may be installed
on older platforms. Apexes use their own variants that enforce
backwards compatibility.
Test: sdk_test.go
Test: TestJNIPackaging
Bug: 149591340
Change-Id: I7d72934aaee2e1326cc0ba5f29f51f14feec4521
Merged-In: I7d72934aaee2e1326cc0ba5f29f51f14feec4521
(cherry picked from commit 82e192c3ae)
Apps that expect to run on older platforms should use JNI libraries
that will also run on older platforms. Require that apps that set
sdk_version have jni_libs modules that also set sdk_version, or
set jni_uses_platform_apis: true to bypass the check.
Fixes: 149591057
Test: app_test.go
Change-Id: I76b9b45fb5773bc4dfc10520108f4f3578723909
Merged-In: I76b9b45fb5773bc4dfc10520108f4f3578723909
Bug: 148447155
Test: built a testing apex with unsigned payload.
Merged-In: I95aa3f11ff1adc1421fcd7ed5a356ee531a0a818
Change-Id: I95aa3f11ff1adc1421fcd7ed5a356ee531a0a818
(cherry picked from commit 98410fd9d6)
Make-var APEX_FILE_CONTEXTS_INFOS should contain entries for
override_apex modules. Otherwise flattened override_apex modules can't
be correctly labeled.
Bug: 154031888
Test: lunch gsi_gms_arm64-userdebug
m file_contexts.bin
check ../file_contexts.bin_intermediates/file_contexts.concat.tmp
if it contains entries for override_apex
Change-Id: I60fc3da1def0f5fe14cfeef32a4c2a07a65b056e
updatable APEXes should set min_sdk_version as well.
Bug: 152655956
Test: m
Merged-In: I8192086eb89fa958dd8ff1b731e43e24bf217ce2
Change-Id: I8192086eb89fa958dd8ff1b731e43e24bf217ce2
(cherry picked from commit 548640b55f)
libopus sets its own apex_available property.
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Merged-In: I4cff3ebb7e017a1fb629b18b72238acf3df0d26e
Change-Id: I4cff3ebb7e017a1fb629b18b72238acf3df0d26e
(cherry picked from commit 47db5adb06)
This reverts commit e17caa63a6.
Reason for revert: rewrite this in ag/11250335 without neverallow
Bug: 152655956
Change-Id: I24436720056ac1b9878e37c2ee45c5806714f3e9
This change adds 'test_for' property to cc_test_* types. The property is
used to mark a module as a test for one or more APEXes, in which case
the module has accecss to the private part of the listed APEXes. For
example, the module is linked with the actrual shared library in the
APEX instead of the stub of the shared library.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: already +2'ed by owner
Bug: 129539670
Bug: 153046163
Test: m
Change-Id: I45ed0d7a15540b0d69b2a3b8d9c4cb202adff6f2
apex_deps/apex/apex_flattened mutators don't have to run if module is
disabled.
For some branches which have no valid targets, apex modules are disabled
by the os mutator. e.g. aosp-build-tools
Some enforcement checks which run during those mutators may fail because
build-environment doesn't provide full context information.
For example, "Platform_version_all_codenames" config variable is not
set while apex.min_sdk_version uses one of those codenames.
Bug: 152655956
Test: m
Merged-In: I47e27d2d025ba4c36534708b113ce77c4cb2397b
Change-Id: I47e27d2d025ba4c36534708b113ce77c4cb2397b
(cherry picked from commit 49f6701e9a)
A module is marked unavailable for platform when 1) it does not have
"//apex_available:platform" in its apex_available property, or 2)
it depends on another module that is unavailable for platform.
In that case, LOCAL_NOT_AVAILABLE_FOR_PLATFORM is set to true for the
module in the Make world. Later, that flag is used to ensure that there
is no module with the flag is installed to the device.
The reason why this isn't entirely done in Soong is because Soong
doesn't know if a module will be installed to the device or not. To
explain this, let's have an example.
cc_test { name: "mytest", static_libs: ["libfoo"]}
cc_library_static { name: "libfoo", static_libs: ["libbar"]}
cc_library { name: "libbar", apex_available: ["com.android.xxx"]}
Here, libbar is not available for platform, but is used by libfoo which
is available for platform (apex_available defaults to
"//apex_available:platform"). libfoo is again depended on by mytest
which again is available for platform. The use of libbar should be
allowed in the context of test; we don't want to make libbar available
to platform just for the dependency from test because it will allow
non-test uses of the library as well.
Soong by itself can't tell whether libfoo and libbar are used only in the
context of a test. There could be another module depending them, e.g.,
cc_library_shared { name: "mylib", static_libs: ["libfoo"] }
can exist and it might be installed to the device, in which case
we really should trigger an error.
Since Make has the knowledge of what's installed and what's not,
the check should be done there.
Bug: 153073816
Test: m
Test: remove "//apex_available:platform" from libmdnssd (it is currently
installed to /system/lib), and check that `m system_image` fails
Change-Id: Ia304cc5f41f173229e8a154e90cea4dce46dcebe
For a given variant of a module that implements ApexModule interface,
the "updatable" property tests if this variant comes from an updatable
apex. For platform variants it is always false.
Test: lunch aosp_walleye-userdebug && m nothing
Bug: 138994281
Change-Id: I2d4c54fb397e29dc9b3203be7fb17be4536529f7
Like other prebuilts (java_import, etc.), android_app_import has now
became ApexModule. It means it supports APEX-specific properties like
apex_available, min_sdk_version, etc.
Bug: 154488897
Test: m
Change-Id: I86f02771496ffc68c98a50ddfc786788fa1e05fb
The marked library(ies) were available to the APEXes via the
hand-written whitelist in build/soong/apex/apex.go. Trying to remove the
whitelist by adding apex_available property to the Android.bp of the
libraries.
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Merged-In: I11a4e877ee27f7c55e2f00371c6fa58daedb1a9f
Change-Id: I11a4e877ee27f7c55e2f00371c6fa58daedb1a9f
It is no longer needed because non-static java_library dependencies are
not considered to be part of the depending APEX.
Bug: 153443117
Bug: 153306490
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: I7d58d1047b2d400395a253e492b35008284778ff
Change-Id: I7d58d1047b2d400395a253e492b35008284778ff
When a source and a prebuilt module are present in the same build a
dependency is added from the source module to the prebuilt module.
Previously, the code for generating the APEX did not recognize that
tag and in some cases (e.g. for cc_(prebuilt_)library_shared) will
fail the build.
This change:
1) Adds a test to reproduce the problem.
2) Improves the debug message by pretty printing the tag.
3) Adds a new ExcludeFromApexContents interface that can be implemented
by a tag to declare that it should be excluded from the APEX
contents.
4) Ignores tags that implement that interface when generating APEX
contents.
5) Implements that interface on prebuiltDependencyTag to fix the
test.
Bug: 153326844
Bug: 153306490
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: I9dd4312c4f995c816c0a31d8d733eb5d7f56e1ea
Change-Id: I9dd4312c4f995c816c0a31d8d733eb5d7f56e1ea
Previously, adding java_library to an sdk required that the names of
any APEXes that transitively compiled against it were added to its
apex_available property. This change removes that requirement.
Also corrects the dependency path in the TestApexAvailable_IndirectDep
error which previously passed through "shared from static" static
dependency tags even though those are explicitly NOT followed when
checking apex_available settings.
Bug: 152878661
Bug: 153306490
Test: m droid
Merged-In: I995ed38956c1bc210b09494812de012fed9f9232
Change-Id: I995ed38956c1bc210b09494812de012fed9f9232
Having dependency tags in the dependency path that shows why a specific
module is considered part of an apex makes it easier to understand why
that is the case and detect possible issues.
Bug: 152762638
Bug: 153306490
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: Iba2a8a5a6abe03dadee456e760aa4373cd00c07b
Change-Id: Iba2a8a5a6abe03dadee456e760aa4373cd00c07b
The DepIsInSameApex() and RequiredSdks() methods were defined in a few
places to avoid having to depend on the whole ApexModule/SdkAware
interfaces directly. However, that has a couple of issues:
1) It duplicates functionality making it difficult to change, changes
to the definitions outside the main interfaces do not cause compile
time failures, instead they result in a runtime change in behavior
which can be difficult to debug.
2) IDE navigation (specifically in Intellij) does not detect that the
duplicate definitions can resolve to the definitions in the main
interface.
This change extracts the methods into their own interfaces and reuses
those interfaces instead of duplicating the methods to fix both of
these issues.
Bug: 152878661
Bug: 153306490
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: I0cfdf342a14eb0bfb82b1bd17e0633d81c7facfb
Change-Id: I0cfdf342a14eb0bfb82b1bd17e0633d81c7facfb
Delegate the responsibility for determining whether the
walkPayloadDeps() should visit a child dependency to its do function.
This is needed to allow the visitor in checkApexAvailability() to avoid
checking the apex_available setting after crossing the APEX boundary.
Bug: 152878661
Bug: 153306490
Test: m droid
Merged-In: If46a2f74b6eca670befc3aeae430650e85542346
Change-Id: If46a2f74b6eca670befc3aeae430650e85542346
The apex available check can traverse quite a long path (5+ steps) to
get from the apex to a module that is missing the apex from its
apex_available property. Understanding where that dependency came from
can often require examining the dependency path which can be difficult.
This change adds the path to the error to simplify that process.
Bug: 153306490
Test: m nothing
Bug: 152762638
Merged-In: Ic4eb169dc2026cd8339d49e23b25d6d1c3879750
Change-Id: Ic4eb169dc2026cd8339d49e23b25d6d1c3879750
Having multiple tests within one method makes debugging specific
failures more difficult so this change split the TestApexAvailable
test into multiple separate tests.
Bug: 153306490
Test: m nothing
Bug: 152762638
Merged-In: I2b2408ef515fd79c078686ef29a6ee8fb0407e7e
Change-Id: I2b2408ef515fd79c078686ef29a6ee8fb0407e7e
Makes sure that the module snapshots do not rely on the white list
of apex available settings so that when those lists are removed it is
not necessary to update any snapshots.
Bug: 142935992
Bug: 153306490
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: Iedcff7dfc2646a4da77258d16e06657dd2f411f9
Change-Id: Iedcff7dfc2646a4da77258d16e06657dd2f411f9
Test apexes no longer check to see whether their contents are available
so the special handling is no longer necessary.
Bug: 142935992
Bug: 153306490
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: Iecae7dcbb87908d19c672f74d3c1ed8810d4485b
Change-Id: Iecae7dcbb87908d19c672f74d3c1ed8810d4485b
The whitelistedApexAvailable used to map references to
com.android.art.debug/release to com.android.art before looking it up
in the white list. This change removed that mapping and simply added
both to the white list.
Bug: 142935992
Bug: 153306490
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: Ibad76fb73988688eb303e056197986ee9a6119ae
Change-Id: Ibad76fb73988688eb303e056197986ee9a6119ae
Coverage build adds extra dependencies for the runtime libs. Marking
them and their transitive dependenciese with apex_available doesn't make
any value; it instead adds noise.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from AOSP
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Merged-In: I08e51cec1de6ded624ef9d4c41c1e5b2e611ff38
(cherry picked from commit 58d1090032)
Change-Id: I08e51cec1de6ded624ef9d4c41c1e5b2e611ff38
The marked library(ies) were available to the adbd APEX via the
hand-written whitelist in build/soong/apex/apex.go. Trying to remove the
whitelist by adding apex_available property to the Android.bp of the
libraries.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from AOSP
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Merged-In: I6afbe905dda11056559521b937803dcd85b32fe5
(cherry picked from commit 3a0db5ef4e)
Change-Id: I6afbe905dda11056559521b937803dcd85b32fe5
The NDK prebuilts are implicitly used when building with sdk_version set.
Make the module types be available to any apex so that we don't need to
manually add apex_available property to the module definitions manually.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from AOSP
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Merged-In: I0870afa4c74b4a06ab1273dff84615778561ecc9
(cherry picked from commit e01e228270)
Change-Id: I0870afa4c74b4a06ab1273dff84615778561ecc9
The marked library(ies) were available to the APEXes via the hand-written
whitelist in build/soong/apex/apex.go. Trying to remove the whitelist
by adding apex_available property to the Android.bp of the libraries.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from AOSP
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Merged-In: I91d1b1076733a949ca2a959ba640ce34d0233492
(cherry picked from commit 541142ce6b)
Change-Id: I91d1b1076733a949ca2a959ba640ce34d0233492
apex_deps/apex/apex_flattened mutators don't have to run if module is
disabled.
For some branches which have no valid targets, apex modules are disabled
by the os mutator. e.g. aosp-build-tools
Some enforcement checks which run during those mutators may fail because
build-environment doesn't provide full context information.
For example, "Platform_version_all_codenames" config variable is not
set while apex.min_sdk_version uses one of those codenames.
Bug: 152655956
Test: m
Change-Id: I47e27d2d025ba4c36534708b113ce77c4cb2397b
For R+, symlinks from /system/lib to VNDK APEX are not necessary. (Note
that, symlinks to older VNDK are still necessary because older vendor
may access old locations.)
Hence, do not make symlinks for R+ VNDK APEX.
Bug: 142911355
Test: m # check /system/lib[64]/ for symlinks
# cf should contain 28/29 symlinks but no symlinks for R
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from internal
Merged-In: I852fad7edebed3e4edc03c374b3643da6b053fed
Change-Id: I852fad7edebed3e4edc03c374b3643da6b053fed
(cherry picked from commit 84026389e7)
For R+, symlinks from /system/lib to VNDK APEX are not necessary. (Note
that, symlinks to older VNDK are still necessary because older vendor
may access old locations.)
Hence, do not make symlinks for R+ VNDK APEX.
Bug: 142911355
Test: m # check /system/lib[64]/ for symlinks
# cf should contain 28/29 symlinks but no symlinks for R
Change-Id: I852fad7edebed3e4edc03c374b3643da6b053fed
For VNDK-Lite devices, which doesn't define BOARD_VNDK_VERSION, VNDK
APEX is built with only VNDK-Sp libraries with core variants.
Bug: 141908078
Bug: 152353068
Bug: 151635128
Test: TH
Merged-In: I0d08d32473368fd158818d4c2c72fc4cfad68ce6
Change-Id: I0d08d32473368fd158818d4c2c72fc4cfad68ce6
(cherry picked from commit 65d8a6262c)
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from internal
Change-Id: I0d08d32473368fd158818d4c2c72fc4cfad68ce6
This is to guard against the potential situation when someone adds
updatable modules to the list of boot jars by mistake.
Test: aosp_walleye-userdebug builds.
Test: Manually break the checks and observe the errors:
- move updatable module 'conscrypt' from
PRODUCT_UPDATABLE_BOOT_JARS to ART_APEX_JARS:
internal error: module 'conscrypt' from updatable apex 'com.android.conscrypt' is not allowed in the ART boot image
- add updatable module 'conscrypt' to ART_APEX_JARS
(but do not remove it from PRODUCT_UPDATABLE_BOOT_JARS):
error: A jar in PRODUCT_UPDATABLE_BOOT_JARS must not be in PRODUCT_BOOT_JARS, but conscrypt is.
- move updatable module 'framework-tethering' from
PRODUCT_UPDATABLE_BOOT_JARS to PRODUCT_BOOT_JARS:
internal error: module 'framework-tethering' from updatable apex 'com.android.tethering' is not allowed in the framework boot image
- add non-updatable (in AOSP) module 'android.net.ipsec.ike'
to PRODUCT_BOOT_JARS:
internal error: failed to find a dex jar path for module 'com.android.ipsec.ike', note that some jars may be filtered out by module constraints
Bug: 147579140
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick, approved in AOSP.
Change-Id: I25ca2f52530fcfa1f9823b2cfa3485db9c0d0db1
Merged-In: I25ca2f52530fcfa1f9823b2cfa3485db9c0d0db1
(cherry picked from commit b28cc3758c)
Apex can use codenames like "Q", "R" for its min_sdk_version property.
Also, cc_library can use codenames for its stubs.versions.
Bug: 152655956
Test: m
Merged-In: I077ad7b2ac5d90b4c8708921e43846206f05ba70
Change-Id: I077ad7b2ac5d90b4c8708921e43846206f05ba70
(cherry picked from commit 29e91d2121)
It is no longer needed because non-static java_library dependencies are
not considered to be part of the depending APEX.
Bug: 153443117
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I7d58d1047b2d400395a253e492b35008284778ff
When a source and a prebuilt module are present in the same build a
dependency is added from the source module to the prebuilt module.
Previously, the code for generating the APEX did not recognize that
tag and in some cases (e.g. for cc_(prebuilt_)library_shared) will
fail the build.
This change:
1) Adds a test to reproduce the problem.
2) Improves the debug message by pretty printing the tag.
3) Adds a new ExcludeFromApexContents interface that can be implemented
by a tag to declare that it should be excluded from the APEX
contents.
4) Ignores tags that implement that interface when generating APEX
contents.
5) Implements that interface on prebuiltDependencyTag to fix the
test.
Bug: 153326844
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I9dd4312c4f995c816c0a31d8d733eb5d7f56e1ea
Previously, adding java_library to an sdk required that the names of
any APEXes that transitively compiled against it were added to its
apex_available property. This change removes that requirement.
Also corrects the dependency path in the TestApexAvailable_IndirectDep
error which previously passed through "shared from static" static
dependency tags even though those are explicitly NOT followed when
checking apex_available settings.
Bug: 152878661
Test: m droid
Change-Id: I995ed38956c1bc210b09494812de012fed9f9232
Having dependency tags in the dependency path that shows why a specific
module is considered part of an apex makes it easier to understand why
that is the case and detect possible issues.
Bug: 152762638
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Iba2a8a5a6abe03dadee456e760aa4373cd00c07b
This is to guard against the potential situation when someone adds
updatable modules to the list of boot jars by mistake.
Test: aosp_walleye-userdebug builds.
Test: Manually break the checks and observe the errors:
- move updatable module 'conscrypt' from
PRODUCT_UPDATABLE_BOOT_JARS to ART_APEX_JARS:
internal error: module 'conscrypt' from updatable apex 'com.android.conscrypt' is not allowed in the ART boot image
- add updatable module 'conscrypt' to ART_APEX_JARS
(but do not remove it from PRODUCT_UPDATABLE_BOOT_JARS):
error: A jar in PRODUCT_UPDATABLE_BOOT_JARS must not be in PRODUCT_BOOT_JARS, but conscrypt is.
- move updatable module 'framework-tethering' from
PRODUCT_UPDATABLE_BOOT_JARS to PRODUCT_BOOT_JARS:
internal error: module 'framework-tethering' from updatable apex 'com.android.tethering' is not allowed in the framework boot image
- add non-updatable (in AOSP) module 'android.net.ipsec.ike'
to PRODUCT_BOOT_JARS:
internal error: failed to find a dex jar path for module 'com.android.ipsec.ike', note that some jars may be filtered out by module constraints
Bug: 147579140
Change-Id: I25ca2f52530fcfa1f9823b2cfa3485db9c0d0db1
The DepIsInSameApex() and RequiredSdks() methods were defined in a few
places to avoid having to depend on the whole ApexModule/SdkAware
interfaces directly. However, that has a couple of issues:
1) It duplicates functionality making it difficult to change, changes
to the definitions outside the main interfaces do not cause compile
time failures, instead they result in a runtime change in behavior
which can be difficult to debug.
2) IDE navigation (specifically in Intellij) does not detect that the
duplicate definitions can resolve to the definitions in the main
interface.
This change extracts the methods into their own interfaces and reuses
those interfaces instead of duplicating the methods to fix both of
these issues.
Bug: 152878661
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I0cfdf342a14eb0bfb82b1bd17e0633d81c7facfb
Revert submission 1242911-sdk_version_variant
Reason for revert: b/153394225
Reverted Changes:
Ife99745fb:Use libnativewindow for platform variant of libagq...
I1bae84c43:Use libnativewindow for platform variant of androi...
I6e6021ed3:Use stl to depend on libc++
Ife99745fb:Use libnativewindow for platform variant of libRSS...
I2c9f439b9:Fix static dependency on libprotobuf-cpp-lite-ndk
Iff2aff9cf:Set sdk_version for cc_genrules used by modules wi...
I7d72934aa:Add sdk mutator for native modules
Ief378a007:Use sdk variant of Soong modules when LOCAL_SDK_VE...
Bug: 149591340
Change-Id: I798fa902c779469c6382b6699351e5d12bf14785
Fixes: 153394225
The partition tag helps merge_target_files.py determine
which apexkeys.txt to select from the framework partial
target files and which to select from the vendor partial
target files. The partition tag is the pysical partition
name, for example, a system_ext module on a device where
system_ext is at system/system_ext has a system
partition tag.
Bug: 138942268
Change-Id: Ia07887b34f1aa77dae94ef23610dfef83c1a5849
Merged-In: Ia07887b34f1aa77dae94ef23610dfef83c1a5849
Apex can use codenames like "Q", "R" for its min_sdk_version property.
Also, cc_library can use codenames for its stubs.versions.
Bug: 152655956
Test: vendor/google/build/build_mainline_modules.sh
Change-Id: I077ad7b2ac5d90b4c8708921e43846206f05ba70
Previously, when Q-targeting apexes are bundled-built, they are built
against the latest stubs.
It was because unwinder is linked dynamically in R and APIs are provided
by libc while Q apexes should run on Q where libc doesn't provide those
APIs. To make Q apexes run on Q device, libc++ should be linked with
static unwinder. But, because libc++ with static unwinder may cause problem
on HWASAN build, Q apexes were built against the latest stubs for bundled
build.
However, Q apexes should be built against Q stubs.
Now, only for HWASAN builds, Q apexes are built against the latest stubs
(and native modules are not linked with static unwinder).
Bug: 151912436
Test: TARGET_SANITIZE=hwaddress m
=> Q apexes(media, resolv, ..) are linked with the latest stubs
m
=> Q apexes are linked with Q stubs,
and Q apexes' libc++ is linked with static unwinder
Merged-In: If32f1b547e6d93e3955c7521eec8aef5851f908c
Change-Id: If32f1b547e6d93e3955c7521eec8aef5851f908c
(cherry picked from commit 7406660685)
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from internal
Change-Id: If32f1b547e6d93e3955c7521eec8aef5851f908c
Compiling native modules against the NDK disables platform features
like ASAN. For anything shipped on the system image there is no
reason to compile against the NDK. Add a new mutator to Soong that
creates a platform and an SDK variant for modules that set
sdk_version, and ignore sdk_version for the platform variant. The
SDK variant will be used for embedding in APKs that may be installed
on older platforms. Apexes use their own variants that enforce
backwards compatibility.
Test: sdk_test.go
Test: TestJNIPackaging
Bug: 149591340
Change-Id: I7d72934aaee2e1326cc0ba5f29f51f14feec4521
Delegate the responsibility for determining whether the
walkPayloadDeps() should visit a child dependency to its do function.
This is needed to allow the visitor in checkApexAvailability() to avoid
checking the apex_available setting after crossing the APEX boundary.
Bug: 152878661
Test: m droid
Change-Id: If46a2f74b6eca670befc3aeae430650e85542346
The partition tag helps merge_target_files.py determine
which apexkeys.txt to select from the framework partial
target files and which to select from the vendor partial
target files. The partition tag is the pysical partition
name, for example, a system_ext module on a device where
system_ext is at system/system_ext has a system
partition tag.
Bug: 138942268
Change-Id: Ia07887b34f1aa77dae94ef23610dfef83c1a5849
The apex available check can traverse quite a long path (5+ steps) to
get from the apex to a module that is missing the apex from its
apex_available property. Understanding where that dependency came from
can often require examining the dependency path which can be difficult.
This change adds the path to the error to simplify that process.
Test: m nothing
Bug: 152762638
Change-Id: Ic4eb169dc2026cd8339d49e23b25d6d1c3879750
Having multiple tests within one method makes debugging specific
failures more difficult so this change split the TestApexAvailable
test into multiple separate tests.
Test: m nothing
Bug: 152762638
Change-Id: I2b2408ef515fd79c078686ef29a6ee8fb0407e7e
Coverage build adds extra dependencies for the runtime libs. Marking
them and their transitive dependenciese with apex_available doesn't make
any value; it instead adds noise.
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Change-Id: I08e51cec1de6ded624ef9d4c41c1e5b2e611ff38
For VNDK-Lite devices, which doesn't define BOARD_VNDK_VERSION, VNDK
APEX is built with only VNDK-Sp libraries with core variants.
Bug: 141908078
Bug: 152353068
Bug: 151635128
Test: TH
Change-Id: I0d08d32473368fd158818d4c2c72fc4cfad68ce6
This is a cherry-pick change.
Test: Built mainline module coverage data
Bug: 152117890
Change-Id: I47bf3e5d6e78c4518729bdb52616e248156d3cec
Merged-In: I47bf3e5d6e78c4518729bdb52616e248156d3cec
Previously, when Q-targeting apexes are bundled-built, they are built
against the latest stubs.
It was because unwinder is linked dynamically in R and APIs are provided
by libc while Q apexes should run on Q where libc doesn't provide those
APIs. To make Q apexes run on Q device, libc++ should be linked with
static unwinder. But, because libc++ with static unwinder may cause problem
on HWASAN build, Q apexes were built against the latest stubs for bundled
build.
However, Q apexes should be built against Q stubs.
Now, only for HWASAN builds, Q apexes are built against the latest stubs
(and native modules are not linked with static unwinder).
Bug: 151912436
Test: TARGET_SANITIZE=hwaddress m
=> Q apexes(media, resolv, ..) are linked with the latest stubs
m
=> Q apexes are linked with Q stubs,
and Q apexes' libc++ is linked with static unwinder
Change-Id: If32f1b547e6d93e3955c7521eec8aef5851f908c
The macro is required only for apex variants regardless of useVndk.
Before the enforcement of LLNDK sdk version, the macro was not passed to
vendor variants.
Bug: 151689896
Test: TARGET_BUILD_APPS=com.android.media.swcodec m
libbase in swcodec apex is linked with liblog#29
(compiled with __ANDROID_SDK_VERSIO__=29)
Merged-In: I57fa4afe027eb39b98bd94d534be9ebe11713f19
Change-Id: I57fa4afe027eb39b98bd94d534be9ebe11713f19
(cherry picked from commit 24282778ee)
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
Even though use_vendor:true is prohibited, there is media.swcodec apex
which is still use_vendor: true and also needs to support Android10.
(min_sdk_version: 29)
Because LLNDK stubs were provided only for the current VNDK version,
media.swcodec couldn't be built against min_sdk_version: 29.
This change introduces additional versions for LLNDK stubs which are
enforced when an apex with use_vendor: true sets min_sdk_version.
To make things easier, the versions of LLNDK stubs are borrowed from its
implementation libraries.
Bug: 147450930
Bug: 149591522
Test: TARGET_BUILD_APPS=com.android.media.swcodec m
(with min_sdk_version: 29 set)
check if liblog/libc/libm/libdl stubs are 29
check if 29 stubs don't have new symbols.
Merged-In: I79946cbb4da6617138a96d2b254349d3a298e77b
Change-Id: I79946cbb4da6617138a96d2b254349d3a298e77b
(cherry picked from commit 380fc3615c)
The macro is required only for apex variants regardless of useVndk.
Before the enforcement of LLNDK sdk version, the macro was not passed to
vendor variants.
Bug: 151689896
Test: TARGET_BUILD_APPS=com.android.media.swcodec m
libbase in swcodec apex is linked with liblog#29
(compiled with __ANDROID_SDK_VERSIO__=29)
Change-Id: I57fa4afe027eb39b98bd94d534be9ebe11713f19
This reverts commit 380fc3615c.
Reason for revert: breaking one of internal targets
Change-Id: Ica96c44078e5a7f674410828af3ba851317775dd
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: revert to fix build failure
The marked library(ies) were available to the adbd APEX via the
hand-written whitelist in build/soong/apex/apex.go. Trying to remove the
whitelist by adding apex_available property to the Android.bp of the
libraries.
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Change-Id: I6afbe905dda11056559521b937803dcd85b32fe5
The marked library(ies) were available to the APEXes via the hand-written
whitelist in build/soong/apex/apex.go. Trying to remove the whitelist
by adding apex_available property to the Android.bp of the libraries.
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Change-Id: I91d1b1076733a949ca2a959ba640ce34d0233492
The NDK prebuilts are implicitly used when building with sdk_version set.
Make the module types be available to any apex so that we don't need to
manually add apex_available property to the module definitions manually.
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Change-Id: I0870afa4c74b4a06ab1273dff84615778561ecc9
Revert submission 1254009-vdex-symlinks
Reason for revert: This causing some devices to fail to boot. See b/151836042 for details.
Reverted Changes:
Iced89071b:Expect vdex files in a target-independent director...
Ifbceb8457:Share vdex files in the ART apex between architect...
Change-Id: I5bd88f8e61d442eed921d840c90777a2750ddb16
This change fixes a bug that license info for statically linked
libraries are absent in the merged notice for APEX. The problem was that
we were iterating over the apexFiles list that represents actual files
(not Soong modules) that are included in the APEX. The problem is now
fixed by iterarting the all the modules that directly or indirectly
contribute to the APEX using walkPayloadDeps() function.
Bug: 149455933
Test: m
Merged-In: I38655da62b590b669ab4649815b61a5a8e314154
(cherry picked from commit 9918e1afd7)
Change-Id: I38655da62b590b669ab4649815b61a5a8e314154
Test: aosp_walleye-userdebug boots.
Test: Check symlinks to *.vdex files in the ART apex:
$ adb shell 'find /apex/com.android.art -name '*.vdex' | xargs ls -l'
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 23 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm/boot-apache-xml.vdex -> ../boot-apache-xml.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 25 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm/boot-bouncycastle.vdex -> ../boot-bouncycastle.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 23 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm/boot-core-icu4j.vdex -> ../boot-core-icu4j.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 24 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm/boot-core-libart.vdex -> ../boot-core-libart.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 19 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm/boot-okhttp.vdex -> ../boot-okhttp.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 12 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm/boot.vdex -> ../boot.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 23 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm64/boot-apache-xml.vdex -> ../boot-apache-xml.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 25 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm64/boot-bouncycastle.vdex -> ../boot-bouncycastle.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 23 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm64/boot-core-icu4j.vdex -> ../boot-core-icu4j.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 24 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm64/boot-core-libart.vdex -> ../boot-core-libart.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 19 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm64/boot-okhttp.vdex -> ../boot-okhttp.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 12 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm64/boot.vdex -> ../boot.vdex
-rw-r--r-- 1 system system 1229 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/boot-apache-xml.vdex
-rw-r--r-- 1 system system 2043 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/boot-bouncycastle.vdex
-rw-r--r-- 1 system system 2883 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/boot-core-icu4j.vdex
-rw-r--r-- 1 system system 865 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/boot-core-libart.vdex
-rw-r--r-- 1 system system 395 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/boot-okhttp.vdex
-rw-r--r-- 1 system system 7125 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/boot.vdex
Bug: 150934453
Change-Id: Ifbceb845749f4c218693f4118e8b35b59ff26de1
This change fixes a bug that license info for statically linked
libraries are absent in the merged notice for APEX. The problem was that
we were iterating over the apexFiles list that represents actual files
(not Soong modules) that are included in the APEX. The problem is now
fixed by iterarting the all the modules that directly or indirectly
contribute to the APEX using walkPayloadDeps() function.
Bug: 149455933
Test: m
Change-Id: I38655da62b590b669ab4649815b61a5a8e314154
Even though use_vendor:true is prohibited, there is media.swcodec apex
which is still use_vendor: true and also needs to support Android10.
(min_sdk_version: 29)
Because LLNDK stubs were provided only for the current VNDK version,
media.swcodec couldn't be built against min_sdk_version: 29.
This change introduces additional versions for LLNDK stubs which are
enforced when an apex with use_vendor: true sets min_sdk_version.
To make things easier, the versions of LLNDK stubs are borrowed from its
implementation libraries.
Bug: 147450930
Bug: 149591522
Test: TARGET_BUILD_APPS=com.android.media.swcodec m
(with min_sdk_version: 29 set)
check if liblog/libc/libm/libdl stubs are 29
check if 29 stubs don't have new symbols.
Change-Id: I79946cbb4da6617138a96d2b254349d3a298e77b
libselinux no longer is included in any APEX. Only the platform variant
of it (/system/lib/libselinux.so) exists and APEXes link to it.
Removing the lib name from the whitelist to make it clear that the
library is not available to any APEX.
Bug: 151053366
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from aosp
Merged-In: Id4fb933141ad32ff5217a58f1c7d689cc657e9ea
(cherry picked from commit 1731f6ae3f)
Change-Id: Id4fb933141ad32ff5217a58f1c7d689cc657e9ea
sdk_version is passed for relevant variants.
If not specified or "current",
it maps to "10000" for platform variants, and
"min_sdk_version" of the apex for apex variants.
Bug: 150860940
Test: m (soong test)
manually check build.ninja
Merged-In: I5102ab0c5086b5ad29d16ac45af55d32062167b4
Change-Id: I5102ab0c5086b5ad29d16ac45af55d32062167b4
(cherry picked from commit ccce2f2c23)
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
This is rarely used feature but cost alot for the local build and build
inra.
Bug: 150506627
Test: m
Merged-In: Iec3ada4a97c7b228f2818563fa0e81b407f2715a
Change-Id: Iec3ada4a97c7b228f2818563fa0e81b407f2715a
(cherry picked from commit c87a059c88)
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
min_sdk_version = 29 implies that the module should support Android10.
Bug: 150431944
Test: m
Merged-In: Iad90a239898f59456900ae7816b90379b1b43406
Change-Id: Iad90a239898f59456900ae7816b90379b1b43406
(cherry picked from commit 5417f775e5)
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
ensureExactContents shouldn't return immediately when it finds a match
from expected list of files.
Bug: 151491839
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: Ie15c811f9cfcae7ede28dee0fcf203cee24659a0
Change-Id: Ie15c811f9cfcae7ede28dee0fcf203cee24659a0
(cherry picked from commit e6436d7bf0)
Native modules within APEX should be linked with proper stub version
according to its min_sdk_version.
For example, when min_sdk_version is set to "29", libfoo in the apex
would be linked to libbar of version 29 from platform, even if it has
a newer version like 30.
Bug: 145796956
Test: m nothing (soong tests)
Merged-In: I4a0b2002587bc24b7deeb5d59b6eeba5e1db5b1f
Change-Id: I4a0b2002587bc24b7deeb5d59b6eeba5e1db5b1f
(cherry picked from commit 03b5185b88)
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: got ORV already.
libselinux no longer is included in any APEX. Only the platform variant
of it (/system/lib/libselinux.so) exists and APEXes link to it.
Removing the lib name from the whitelist to make it clear that the
library is not available to any APEX.
Bug: 151053366
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Change-Id: Id4fb933141ad32ff5217a58f1c7d689cc657e9ea
When there is a runtime depedency (via runtime_libs property) to a
library providing stable C APIs, the dependency is considered as
crossing APEX boundary. Therefore, the requested lib doesn't need to be
made available to the APEX where the requesting lib is in.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from aosp, approved there.
Bug: 147813447
Test: m
Merged-In: I9cf8a5877850fb85b92c851e15fac921b8b7641b
(cherry picked from commit 323a4c3ab3)
Change-Id: I9cf8a5877850fb85b92c851e15fac921b8b7641b
Makes sure that the module snapshots do not rely on the white list
of apex available settings so that when those lists are removed it is
not necessary to update any snapshots.
Bug: 142935992
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Iedcff7dfc2646a4da77258d16e06657dd2f411f9
Test apexes no longer check to see whether their contents are available
so the special handling is no longer necessary.
Bug: 142935992
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Iecae7dcbb87908d19c672f74d3c1ed8810d4485b
The whitelistedApexAvailable used to map references to
com.android.art.debug/release to com.android.art before looking it up
in the white list. This change removed that mapping and simply added
both to the white list.
Bug: 142935992
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ibad76fb73988688eb303e056197986ee9a6119ae
Merged-In: Ibad76fb73988688eb303e056197986ee9a6119ae
NativeBridgeRelativePath should be appended after /bin or /lib and
before subdir.
Bug: N/A
Test: m (add a soong test)
Change-Id: Id0c44c66b4900caa291e816cf3361fdec8ff9421
Checking apex_available was missing some corner cases.
For example, the deps of share deps of cc_library modules are missed
while those from cc_library_shared are correctly tracked.
This was due to..
* calling DepIsInSameApex in WalkDeps: both work fine separately, but
when they are used together, it fails to work. It's due to how WalkDeps
works. (We might fix this bug too risky since it is used very widely)
* incorrect receiver for DepIsInSameApex in apex_deps mutator: receiver
is supposed to be parent, but child was used before. Interestingly lots
of deps are within the same group of module types(cc to cc, java to
java), it has worked. (note that receiver's DepIsInSameApex
implementation can be different).
This change fixes them by..
* walkPayloadDeps is now relying on ApexVariation, which is calculated
correctly by TopDown apex_deps mutator.
* use correct receiver for DepIsInSameApex in apex_deps mutator, which
requires for java.SdkLibrary to override the method and for
java.Library/Import to use passed dep instead of receiver to check its
membership of sdk.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from aosp/master
Bug: 151071238
Test: build/boot
Merged-In: I0569ef4bb8e79635e4d97a89f421a8d8b7d26456
(cherry picked from commit 5e9013be22)
Change-Id: I0569ef4bb8e79635e4d97a89f421a8d8b7d26456
Checking apex_available was missing some corner cases.
For example, the deps of share deps of cc_library modules are missed
while those from cc_library_shared are correctly tracked.
This was due to..
* calling DepIsInSameApex in WalkDeps: both work fine separately, but
when they are used together, it fails to work. It's due to how WalkDeps
works. (We might fix this bug too risky since it is used very widely)
* incorrect receiver for DepIsInSameApex in apex_deps mutator: receiver
is supposed to be parent, but child was used before. Interestingly lots
of deps are within the same group of module types(cc to cc, java to
java), it has worked. (note that receiver's DepIsInSameApex
implementation can be different).
This change fixes them by..
* walkPayloadDeps is now relying on ApexVariation, which is calculated
correctly by TopDown apex_deps mutator.
* use correct receiver for DepIsInSameApex in apex_deps mutator, which
requires for java.SdkLibrary to override the method and for
java.Library/Import to use passed dep instead of receiver to check its
membership of sdk.
Bug: 151071238
Test: build/boot
Change-Id: I0569ef4bb8e79635e4d97a89f421a8d8b7d26456
When the check for apex_available has failed, the build system now shows
the module that brought the unavailable module into the APEX.
Bug: 151051671
Test: m
Merged-In: Id1a3fda67fe56fdc2dc90ec800d10689415de4d6
(cherry picked from commit 7bd9444b0f)
Change-Id: Id1a3fda67fe56fdc2dc90ec800d10689415de4d6
When the check for apex_available has failed, the build system now shows
the module that brought the unavailable module into the APEX.
Bug: 151051671
Test: m
Change-Id: Id1a3fda67fe56fdc2dc90ec800d10689415de4d6
sdk_version is passed for relevant variants.
If not specified or "current",
it maps to "10000" for platform variants, and
"min_sdk_version" of the apex for apex variants.
Bug: 150860940
Test: m (soong test)
manually check build.ninja
Change-Id: I5102ab0c5086b5ad29d16ac45af55d32062167b4
Native modules within APEX should be linked with proper stub version
according to its min_sdk_version.
For example, when min_sdk_version is set to "29", libfoo in the apex
would be linked to libbar of version 29 from platform, even if it has
a newer version like 30.
Bug: 145796956
Test: m nothing (soong tests)
Change-Id: I4a0b2002587bc24b7deeb5d59b6eeba5e1db5b1f
Add a min_sdk_version property apexes. Currently a noop, but will
be used to enforce that dependencies are compatible with the
specified version.
Test: m checkbuild
Bug: 149591522
Merged-In: I923773c90fe15becbffae3986791aa9edde8f8f6
Change-Id: I923773c90fe15becbffae3986791aa9edde8f8f6
(cherry picked from commit 50317874ff)
apex { name: "foo" }
override_apex { name: "override_foo", base:"foo" }
PRODUCT_MANIFEST_PACKAGE_NAME_OVERRIDES := foo:com.android.foo
Previously, the override was done only for the overridden package "foo",
but not for "override_foo". Fixing this issue by using ctx.ModuleName()
when finding the package name to use.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from internal
Bug: 150645663
Test: m
Merged-In: I2947e5c75369216a4bbce8749503236be86771c3
(cherry picked from commit a519c54dd3)
Change-Id: I2947e5c75369216a4bbce8749503236be86771c3
apex { name: "foo" }
override_apex { name: "override_foo", base:"foo" }
PRODUCT_MANIFEST_PACKAGE_NAME_OVERRIDES := foo:com.android.foo
Previously, the override was done only for the overridden package "foo",
but not for "override_foo". Fixing this issue by using ctx.ModuleName()
when finding the package name to use.
Bug: 150645663
Test: m
Change-Id: I2947e5c75369216a4bbce8749503236be86771c3
This is rarely used feature but cost alot for the local build and build
inra.
Bug: 150506627
Test: m
Change-Id: Iec3ada4a97c7b228f2818563fa0e81b407f2715a
When there is a runtime depedency (via runtime_libs property) to a
library providing stable C APIs, the dependency is considered as
crossing APEX boundary. Therefore, the requested lib doesn't need to be
made available to the APEX where the requesting lib is in.
Bug: 147813447
Test: m
Change-Id: I9cf8a5877850fb85b92c851e15fac921b8b7641b
If an APEX contains APKs and the manifest package name of the APKs are
overridden (either via override_android_app
orPRODUCT_MANIFEST_PACKAGE_NAME_OVERRIDES), that the path to the APK
(relative in the APEX) and the overridden manifest package name is
recorded in the bundle config file.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from master
Bug: 148002117
Test: m
Merged-In: Ibb90bcefb77fa6b2dad77cb2facc6079de9ab154
(cherry picked from commit cfaa1643e8)
Change-Id: Ibb90bcefb77fa6b2dad77cb2facc6079de9ab154
bundle config file for apexes are auto-generated. It is included in the
<apex>-base.zip file, which is expected to be extracted and then fed
into the bundletool.
This change is in preparation for the upcoming change to include
information about embedded apks in the bundle confir file.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from master
Bug: 148002117
Test: m
Merged-In: If25d75e0f62036dc777faf8593ed8eb9a74950b0
(cherry picked from commit bd15961043)
Change-Id: If25d75e0f62036dc777faf8593ed8eb9a74950b0
If an APEX contains APKs and the manifest package name of the APKs are
overridden (either via override_android_app
orPRODUCT_MANIFEST_PACKAGE_NAME_OVERRIDES), that the path to the APK
(relative in the APEX) and the overridden manifest package name is
recorded in the bundle config file.
Bug: 148002117
Test: m
Change-Id: Ibb90bcefb77fa6b2dad77cb2facc6079de9ab154
bundle config file for apexes are auto-generated. It is included in the
<apex>-base.zip file, which is expected to be extracted and then fed
into the bundletool.
This change is in preparation for the upcoming change to include
information about embedded apks in the bundle confir file.
Bug: 148002117
Test: m
Change-Id: If25d75e0f62036dc777faf8593ed8eb9a74950b0
Using $(call dist-for-goals,droidcore,...) for every apex
installed-files.txt causes every apex to be built for all builds,
causing a signficiant regression in build time. For now only
dist them in checkbuilds, which were going to build all of them
anyways.
Ideally we would like to dist the installed-files.txt only if
the apex was already built, but there is not currently a way to
express that.
Test: treehugger
Bug: 149979076
Change-Id: I21edbc90980f94ad6d497cb86ee80223dd782fe1
Merged-In: I21edbc90980f94ad6d497cb86ee80223dd782fe1
(cherry picked from commit 1c85e8e019)
Which is the list of JNI libraries that are embeded inside the apex.
jni_libs is handled just like native_shared_libs except that it is
stored in apex_manifest.
When linkerconfig finds an apex with JNI libs, it exposes the namespace
for the apex as visible so that libnativeloader can link the namespace
to the corresponding classloader-namespace.
Bug: 149363889
Test: m nothing(runs soong test)
Change-Id: I52ebe38b44545e6e8853e34a3404a235c858112a
Embed common properties (apexNativeDependencies) so that the logic for
adding dependencies for native modules can be reused.
Bug: N/A
Test: m
Change-Id: I789b526c09eea14213ab1544590ed2238ed8c625
ensureExactContent shouldn't return immediately when it finds a match
from expected list of files.
Bug: N/A
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ie15c811f9cfcae7ede28dee0fcf203cee24659a0
Symlinking doesn't make sense for host APEXes.
Bug: 150255435
Test: m com.android.art.host and inspect the built APEX; there is
no symlink.
Merged-In: I28492dfaaef471117a430be05255fbef76e557b0
(cherry picked from commit 9b96418dfe)
Change-Id: I28492dfaaef471117a430be05255fbef76e557b0
Using $(call dist-for-goals,droidcore,...) for every apex
installed-files.txt causes every apex to be built for all builds,
causing a signficiant regression in build time. For now only
dist them in checkbuilds, which were going to build all of them
anyways.
Ideally we would like to dist the installed-files.txt only if
the apex was already built, but there is not currently a way to
express that.
Test: treehugger
Bug: 149979076
Change-Id: I21edbc90980f94ad6d497cb86ee80223dd782fe1
Symlinking doesn't make sense for host APEXes.
Bug: 150255435
Test: m com.android.art.host and inspect the built APEX; there is
no symlink.
Change-Id: I28492dfaaef471117a430be05255fbef76e557b0
Because APK-in-APEX embeds its jni_libs in it. We don't have to follow
deps of jni_libs.
Bug: 146992436
Test: m com.android.tethering
deapexer extract com.android.tethering.apex apex
ls apex # there should be no /lib dir
Merged-In: Ifa1a6430a420ae7376b155cd59b8ece462cced7e
Change-Id: Ifa1a6430a420ae7376b155cd59b8ece462cced7e
(cherry picked from commit b7bebe2616)
Because APK-in-APEX embeds its jni_libs in it. We don't have to follow
deps of jni_libs.
Bug: 146992436
Test: m com.android.tethering
deapexer extract com.android.tethering.apex apex
ls apex # there should be no /lib dir
Change-Id: Ifa1a6430a420ae7376b155cd59b8ece462cced7e
Add a min_sdk_version property apexes. Currently a noop, but will
be used to enforce that dependencies are compatible with the
specified version.
Test: m checkbuild
Bug: 149591522
Change-Id: I923773c90fe15becbffae3986791aa9edde8f8f6
Apps that expect to run on older platforms should use JNI libraries
that will also run on older platforms. Require that apps that set
sdk_version have jni_libs modules that also set sdk_version, or
set jni_uses_platform_apis: true to bypass the check.
Fixes: 149591057
Test: app_test.go
Change-Id: I76b9b45fb5773bc4dfc10520108f4f3578723909
As a second step to removing the go/android3p instructions to copy or
to link NOTICE to LICENSE, include LICENSE files in the notices, which
will allow deleting all of the copied/linked NOTICE files.
The change causes a few additions to the system image notice files.
Test: manually built and compared before and after notices
Change-Id: Ia7bc58e2eba7bed5e63934881b5298201a93bc3e
This will allow installing Q launched APEXes built from master on Q
devices.
Test: m com.android.conscrypt
Test: see another CL in topic
Test: lunch blueline-userdebug
Test: TARGET_BUILD_APPS=com.android.resolv m
Test: installed on Q blueline, verified installation succeeded
Bug: 149733822
Change-Id: Ia863b5701716ef4022b470ee758368ea4fffb1d4
The optimization is confusing syshealth because the modules will use
more memory when they are switched to the prebuilt (unbundled) or
updated via Play.
Let's have a per-module switch to control the behavior and turn it on
only for non-updatable modules like ART.
Bug: 149805758
Test: m
Change-Id: Ieb842c47f31f3b06e403b1e1f9e463c3e5524107
This change fixes a regression that was introduced with
I597bccbb177b6b6320c3a3edeff467243230d384. With the change, the content
of the permissions XML file for a java_sdk_library was determined before
the java_sdk_library is mutated for an APEX. As a result, the file path
to the implementation jar library was always set to
/system/framework/*.jar regardless of whether the java_sdk_library is
part of an APEX or not.
This change fixes the problem, by creating the permissions XML file via
a new module type. The content of the xml file is determined after the
xml file is mutated for APEXes.
Bug: 149600642
Test: m
Change-Id: Id21f8d8285df49b0b3be1daf0f101f2bc978eeb0
Bug: 149075752
Test: tapas com.android.conscrypt com.android.tethering arm64
Test: m out/target/product/generic_arm64/{,symbols/}apex/com.android.{tethering,conscrypt}/lib64/libc++.so
Test: Verified that unwinder was dynamically linked to tethering's
Test: libc++ and statically linked to conscrypt's.
Test: lunch flame-userdebug && m
Test: Verified that unwinder was dynamically linked to /system/lib64/libc++.so
Change-Id: I98eed7cb4316962b19b5c12e150c224c25d0e91d
apex { name: ["myapex"], native_shared_libs: ["libX", "libY"] }
cc_library { name: "libX", shared_libs: ["libY"] }
cc_library { name: "libY", shared_libs: ["libZ"], stubs: {...} }
apexDepsMutator was a bottom up mutator and it uses WalkDeps to traverse
the dependency tree rooted at myapex in a depth-first order. While
traversing the tree, if calls BuildForApex for a module that will be
part of the APEX.
libY is visited twice. Once via libX and once via myapex. If the visit
from libX was before the visit from myapex (since this is a depth-first
traversing), BuildForApex is not called for libY and its dependency
libZ, because libY provides a stub. And then when libY is again visited
via myapex, BuildForApex is correctly called for the module, but not for
its dependencies libZ because the paths from libY to libZ was already
visited.
As a result, the apex variant of libY has a dependency to the non-apex
variant of libZ.
Fixing the problem by changing the mutator a top-down one.
Bug: 148645937
Test: m
Change-Id: Ib2cb28852087c63a568b3fd036504e9261cf0782
The apex dependency map wasn't updated for test or non-installable
APEXes to work around the problem that a module being in such APEX
prevented the module from being installed in the system partition.
Since that problem is not happening any more, removing the unnecessary
work-around.
Bug: 123892969
Test: m
Change-Id: I43e07a9611a3e08ff39b9a64454b1c67949d35bc
When a module is not available for platform (i.e.
//apex_available:platform is missing in the apex_available property), m
<module_name> previously just didn't work because there is no platform
variant of the module.
This change fixes the behavior; regardless of whether the platform
variant is available or not, m <module_name> builds all the apex
variants of the module along with the platform variant if it exists.
Bug: 147728094
Test: m conscrypt
Change-Id: Iedd3fa6fc0ed779c5f7c5d65f23d86f799ac0cbe
This library is empty, and its functionality has moved
into libbinder/libhwbinder.
Bug: 148692216
Test: N/A
Change-Id: I5874efda9ab43fc00cf90395a1aabde45cf49579
The APEX dependency is more correctly tracked. Previously, the
dependency was tracked while we gather modules that will be installed to
an APEX. This actually was incorrect because we skipped many dependency
types that we don't need to follow to gather the modules list, such as
the headers dependency.
Now, the dependency is tracked directly when a module is mutated for an
APEX. In other words, if a module is mutated for an apex X, then the
module will appear in the X-deps-into.txt file.
This change also changes the format of the txt file. It now clearly
shows why a module is included in the APEX by showing the list of
modules that depend on the module.
Bug: 146323213
Test: m
Change-Id: I0a70cf9cce56e36565f9d55683fdaace8748a081
The function visits dependencies of an APEX that contribute to the
payload. checkApexAvailability is rewritten using the generic function.
There is no change in behavior.
Bug: N/A
Test: m
Change-Id: I1a8b4eb0a60a432f667a61b4f6f457c3b8f1cd3d
With I63f8a1de463011c6e0b97f5f6eee83103e22bc30, a flattened APEX is
installed to /system/apex/<apexBundleName> not /system/apex/<apexName>.
The change was to be in sync with the non-flattened APEXes that are
installed to /system/apex/<apexBundleName>.apex.
apexName is from the 'name' property while apexBundleName is from the
'apex_name' property. The two names are mostly the same, but can be
different, notably for the ART and the VNDK APEXes. e,g apexName =
com.android.art, apexBundleName = com.android.art.release.
However, there was a bug in the fix; we haven't updated the path for the
flattened APEXes in other places: filecontexts and symlinks. As a
result, the files for the APEXes where apexName is different from
apexBundleName were incorrectly labeled and caused a boot loop.
Fixing the bug.
Bug: 140136207
Bug: 149013536
Test: m
Test: OVERRIDE_TARGET_FLATTEN_APEX=true m; then inspect the built
system.img to verify that
/system/apex/com.android.vndk.current/lib/libcrypto.so is correctly
labeled as system_lib_file.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from internal
Merged-In: I4aaf674a5daeabab5ed6e7025c5389821ee9a013
(cherry picked from commit be95e6b245)
Change-Id: I4aaf674a5daeabab5ed6e7025c5389821ee9a013
With I63f8a1de463011c6e0b97f5f6eee83103e22bc30, a flattened APEX is
installed to /system/apex/<apexBundleName> not /system/apex/<apexName>.
The change was to be in sync with the non-flattened APEXes that are
installed to /system/apex/<apexBundleName>.apex.
apexName is from the 'name' property while apexBundleName is from the
'apex_name' property. The two names are mostly the same, but can be
different, notably for the ART and the VNDK APEXes. e,g apexName =
com.android.art, apexBundleName = com.android.art.release.
However, there was a bug in the fix; we haven't updated the path for the
flattened APEXes in other places: filecontexts and symlinks. As a
result, the files for the APEXes where apexName is different from
apexBundleName were incorrectly labeled and caused a boot loop.
Fixing the bug.
Bug: 140136207
Bug: 149013536
Test: m
Test: OVERRIDE_TARGET_FLATTEN_APEX=true m; then inspect the built
system.img to verify that
/system/apex/com.android.vndk.current/lib/libcrypto.so is correctly
labeled as system_lib_file.
Change-Id: I4aaf674a5daeabab5ed6e7025c5389821ee9a013
Previously, a java_sdk_library called "SDKLIB" would create a
prebuilt_etc module called "SDKLIB.xml" which installs the generated
XML permission file to /etc/permissions/SDKLIB.xml. That module
depended on the java_sdk_library "SDKLIB" to generate the XML file
as one of its outputs by specifying srcs: [":SDKLIB{.xml}"].
If the java_sdk_library is replaced by a prebuilt then the SDKLIB.xml
module expects the prebuilt to provide the XML permissions file which
it doesn't because that is an implementation detail and so the build
breaks.
A couple of alternative approaches were looked at to fix this. One was
to have the logic that replaced the source module with the prebuilt to
inform the source module that it was being replaced so it could disable
its created module. That lead to a dependency cycle where
SDKLIB -> SDKLIB.xml -> SDKLIB{.xml}
Another solution was to mark dependency tags in such a way that the
prebuilt could automatically identify and disable the SDKLIB.xml
module. Similar to how the visibility code will ignore dependencies
that are tagged with ExcludeFromVisibilityEnforcementTag. That became
very convoluted.
Instead the java_sdk_library was changed so that it was not responsible
for creating the XML permissions file. Instead it created a genrule
called "gen-SDKLIB.xml" to create it and then "SDKLIB.xml" depended on
that. The java_sdk_library also depended on the genrule to make the XML
permissions file available for APEX and testing.
Some refactoring of the APEX code and tests was necessary because they
had knowledge of the internal implementation of java_sdk_library. The
refactoring insulates them a little better from those details.
Bug: 148080325
Test: m droid && TARGET_BUILD_APPS=Camera2 m
Change-Id: I597bccbb177b6b6320c3a3edeff467243230d384
Currently, com.android.runtime provides libc/libm/libdl to system. But
they are supposed to be used from symlinks under /system/lib not
directly from runtime apex.
This helps linkerconfig to generate ld.config.txt automatically for
apexes.
Bug: 144664390
Test: m com.android.runtime
deapexer info com.android.runtime.apex
Change-Id: I1620e88e489fba88a06cc3bd6eb5b86a9b581e4f
This change fixes a bug that apex_available is not enforced for static
dependencies. For example, a module with 'apex_available:
["//apex_available:platform"]' was able to be statically linked to any
APEX. This was happening because the check was done on the modules that
are actually installed to an APEX. Static dependencies of the modules
were not counted as they are not installed to the APEX as files.
Fixing this bug by doing the check by traversing the tree in the method
checkApexAvailability.
This change includes a few number of related changes:
1) DepIsInSameApex implementation for cc.Module was changed as well.
Previuosly, it returned false only when the dependency is actually a
stub variant of a lib. Now, it returns false when the dependency has one
or more stub variants. To understand why, we need to recall that when
there is a dependency to a lib having stubs, we actually create two
dependencies: to the non-stub variant and to the stub variant during the
DepsMutator phase. And later in the build action generation phase, we
choose one of them depending on the context. Also recall that an APEX
variant is created only when DepIsInSameApex returns true. Given these,
with the previous implementatin of DepIsInSameApex, we did create apex
variants of the non-stub variant of the dependency, while not creating
the apex variant for the stub variant. This is not right; we needlessly
created the apex variant. The extra apex variant has caused no harm so
far, but since the apex_available check became more correct, it actually
breaks the build. To fix the issue, we stop creating the APEX variant
both for non-stub and stub variants.
2) platform variant is created regardless of the apex_available value.
This is required for the case when a library X that provides stub is in
an APEX A and is configured to be available only for A. In that case,
libs in other APEX can't use the stub library since the stub library is
mutated only for apex A. By creating the platform variant for the stub
library, it can be used from outside as the default dependency variation
is set to the platform variant when creating the APEX variations.
3) The ApexAvailableWhitelist is added with the dependencies that were
revealed with this change.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from internal
Bug: 147671264
Test: m
Merged-In: Iaedc05494085ff4e8af227a6392bdd0c338b8e6e
(cherry picked from commit fa89944c79)
Change-Id: Iaedc05494085ff4e8af227a6392bdd0c338b8e6e
This reverts commit a952495643.
Reason for revert: PermissionController may need to be built outside of APEX
Fixes: 148957736
Change-Id: I80a2cd666ea5028741250dd2cebf2bd7d7b331ad
apex {
name: "myapex",
native_shared_libs: ["libfoo"],
apex_name: "apex_name",
}
override_apex {
name: "myapex.override",
base: "myapex"
}
Previsouly, above wasn't supported because both APEXes have the same
apex_name and that apex_name is used as the suffix of libfoo. i.e.,
there are two libfoo.apex_name modules defined.
Now, the two apex variants of libfoo are named as
libfoo.myapex and libfoo.myapex.override.
Bug: 140136207
Test: m
Change-Id: I63f8a1de463011c6e0b97f5f6eee83103e22bc30
This change fixes a bug that apex_available is not enforced for static
dependencies. For example, a module with 'apex_available:
["//apex_available:platform"]' was able to be statically linked to any
APEX. This was happening because the check was done on the modules that
are actually installed to an APEX. Static dependencies of the modules
were not counted as they are not installed to the APEX as files.
Fixing this bug by doing the check by traversing the tree in the method
checkApexAvailability.
This change includes a few number of related changes:
1) DepIsInSameApex implementation for cc.Module was changed as well.
Previuosly, it returned false only when the dependency is actually a
stub variant of a lib. Now, it returns false when the dependency has one
or more stub variants. To understand why, we need to recall that when
there is a dependency to a lib having stubs, we actually create two
dependencies: to the non-stub variant and to the stub variant during the
DepsMutator phase. And later in the build action generation phase, we
choose one of them depending on the context. Also recall that an APEX
variant is created only when DepIsInSameApex returns true. Given these,
with the previous implementatin of DepIsInSameApex, we did create apex
variants of the non-stub variant of the dependency, while not creating
the apex variant for the stub variant. This is not right; we needlessly
created the apex variant. The extra apex variant has caused no harm so
far, but since the apex_available check became more correct, it actually
breaks the build. To fix the issue, we stop creating the APEX variant
both for non-stub and stub variants.
2) platform variant is created regardless of the apex_available value.
This is required for the case when a library X that provides stub is in
an APEX A and is configured to be available only for A. In that case,
libs in other APEX can't use the stub library since the stub library is
mutated only for apex A. By creating the platform variant for the stub
library, it can be used from outside as the default dependency variation
is set to the platform variant when creating the APEX variations.
3) The ApexAvailableWhitelist is added with the dependencies that were
revealed with this change.
Bug: 147671264
Test: m
Change-Id: Iaedc05494085ff4e8af227a6392bdd0c338b8e6e
apex module accepts PlatformCompatConfigIntf as prebuilt,
and places it in the etc folder of the apex.
Test: m
Test: flash device with dummy config in mediaprovider APEX -
the config is present
Change-Id: Ifc62cd262f6c6571c1bf6c2943879aa20877ecad
All commands must produce their output files, or they'll trigger
rebuilds the next build.
Test: m com.android.apex.cts.shim.v3; repeat; "ninja: nothing to do"
Change-Id: If30e9d90ce3efc0689cd04ac62cc8207f3a38dd5
Leaving out LOCAL_CERTIFICATE for flattened apex APKs causes
the apkcerts.txt to have empty keys for those APKs, which
confuses the signing tools. Set LOCAL_CERTIFICATE for them.
Also refactor the Certificate support to avoid introducing
duplicated handling for presigned certificates.
Bug: 147765187
Test: m apkcerts-list
Change-Id: Ife07661761cd5a89c9f009b8ce041db4dff9ec54
Ulyana Trafimovich