Prepare for making the relationship between an llndk_library stubs
module and the cc_library implementation module explicit by
adding an llndk_stubs property. Each cc_library will be updated
to point to its llndk_library, and the llndk_library name will
be changed to make the .llndk suffix explicit. Then the implicit
connection and suffix can be removed.
Bug: 170784825
Test: m checkbuild
Change-Id: I6b0482a3f286ec29b2e928551aa4317749f2b499
A global variant was used to store the global mapping between
modules and APEXes. Replace it with storing pointers to APEX
contents inside each module so that they can query the contents
of any APEXes they belong to.
Bug: 146393795
Test: all Soong tests
Test: single line change to build.ninja host install dependency ordering
Test: no Android-${TARGET_PRODUCT}.mk, make_vars-${TARGET_PRODUCT}.mk or late-${TARGET_PRODUCT}.mk
Change-Id: Id2d7b73ea27f8c3b41d30820bdd86b65c539bfa4
When building an APEX, the build system included artifacts from all
targets that are returned from ctx.MultiTargets(). This however has
became a problem as we add new host targets like linux_bionic_arm64.
When there are multiple host targets having different OSes,
ctx.MultiTargets() returns one target per a host OS. For example, when
linux_bionic_arm64 is enabled, ctx.MultiTargets() returns the following
two targets because linux_bionic != linux_glibc.
* linux_glibc_86_64
* linux_bionic_arm64
Some dependencies (like soong_zip, etc.) are not enabled for the new
host target (because they don't have to) and therefore the build fails.
Since the purpose of host APEX is to package some host tools for
testing, etc., we actually don't need the second target for APEX.
Fixing the problem by not skipping "cross host" targets which can't be
natively executed on the host machine.
Bug: 169454252
Test: HOST_CROSS_OS=linux_bionic HOST_CROSS_ARCH=arm64 m
Test: DIST_DIR=$(pwd)/out/dist \
./art/tools/dist_linux_bionic.sh com.android.support.apexer
Change-Id: Idaded56e4b4fc0195c8bbc760e4b4728016bd5b4
Flattened APEXes are installed in /<partition>/apex/<name>, so its
file_contexts file should be amended accordingly.
For example, file_contexts of an apex "com.android.foo" with should be
modified by prepending actual install path to the path regex.
/bin/foo <sepolicy label>
=> /system/apex/com\.android\.foo/bin/foo <sepolicy label>
File_contexts file is emitted to "make" via LOCAL_FILE_CONTEXTS variable
for apex_manifest.pb module.
Make collects these files and use them to build file_contexts.bin.
Also removed global state which is used to keep the list of all
flattened apexes.
Bug: 166518492
Test: m file_contexts.bin
check intermediate file_contexts.modules.tmp file
in $OUT/obj/ETC/file_contexts.bin_intermediates/
Change-Id: I780370b6e576964a5c09f9477f3361f341dd576b
Keeping the int constant around for now as FutureApiLevelInt because
it's still useful in places that haven't adopted ApiLevel yet for
testing if their non-ApiLevel API level is current or not.
Test: treehugger
Bug: http://b/154667674
Change-Id: I47a7012703f41fdeb56f91edf9c83afa93042deb
AddFarVariationDependencies was broken, which allowed apex to add
dependencies on tests by requesting an empty test_per_src variation
even though some test dependencies did not have a test_per_src
variation. Add an alias from the pre-test_per_src variation
variant to the empty test_per_src variation, and drop the
test_per_src variation when requesting the depencency.
Test: TestApexWithTests
Change-Id: I2ed7bdd761027956141e25d4d81f9074afe628b6
This change fixes a bug that notice files for some module type (e.g.
prebuilt_etc) were not included in APEX. This happened because we relied
on WalkPayloadDeps which actually doesn't traverse module types that
don't implement ApexModule interface. prebuilt_etc is one such module
type. Fixing the problem by also iterating the filesInfo array which
has info about all modules that are included in the APEX.
Bug: 166575301
Test: m com.android.tzdata and inspect the built artifact.
NOTICE.html.gz is there.
Change-Id: Iceb055b60184aef2a3e65e44680304853eb79a53
bpf program is put to an APEX via 'bpfs' property. It is
placed under etc/bpf directory in it.
Fix: 167530625
Test: m
Change-Id: Ia36b486f0cffb619ecc4f7a318cde881abc5baf4
prebuilt_firmware module is one of many prebuilt_etc-like modules. When
it is soc-specific, it is installed in /vendor/firmware. Similarly, when
prebuilt_firmware is embeded in a vendor apex, installing it in
<apex>/firmware instead of <apex>/etc.
Bug: 162701747
Test: lunch sunfish-userdebug
m && device boots && vibrator works
Change-Id: I00d28cde42259aaf8221e3897df77efc42b0c1ca
The affected modules weren't actually built in the affected build,
delay the platform availability check in Make instead to allow
the build to proceed.
Bug: 154888298
Test: m checkbuild
Change-Id: I21778e38e04635545b352dee2043a33ec9da246b
Add the new property payload_fs_type in apex module type. Either 'f2fs'
or 'ext4'. Default 'ext4'.
Test: m
Bug: 158453869
Change-Id: I36f373251bd597e11acb62af75437a87e2a531ec
Merged-In: I36f373251bd597e11acb62af75437a87e2a531ec
AddFarVariationDependencies was broken, which allowed sdk modules to
request dependencies using image and version variations, even for
host modules that do not have image or version variations. Make
the image and version variations conditional on device sdk modules.
Test: go test ./sdk
Change-Id: I59b7a32a3782254fd5feb828a5258ee13d4db812
APEX variants that share the same SDK version and updatability
almost always use identical command line arguments to build but
with different intermediates directories. This causes unnecessary
build time and disk space for duplicated work.
Deduplicate APEX variants that would build identically. Create
aliases from the per-APEX variations to the new shared variations
so that the APEX modules can continue to depend on them via the
APEX name as the variation.
This has one significant change in behavior. Before this change,
if an APEX had two libraries in its direct dependencies and one
of those libraries depended on the other, and the second library
had stubs, then the first library would depend on the implementation
of the second library and not the stubs. After this change, if
the first library is also present in a second APEX but the second
library is not, then the common variant shared between the two
APEXes would use the stubs, not the implementation.
In a correctly configured set of build rules this change will
be irrelevant, because if the compilation worked for the second
APEX using stubs then it will work for the common variant using
stubs. However, if an incorrect change to the build rules is
made this could lead to confusing errors, as a previously-working
common variant could suddenly stop building when a module is added
to a new APEX without its dependencies that require implementation
APIs to compile.
This change reduces the number of modules in an AOSP arm64-userdebug
build by 3% (52242 to 50586), reduces the number of variants of the
libcutils module from 74 to 53, and reduces the number of variants
of the massive libart[d] modules from 44 to 32.
This relands I0529837476a253c32b3dfb98dcccf107427c742c with a fix
to always mark permissions XML files of java_sdk_library modules as
unique per apex since they contain the APEX filename, and a fix
to UpdateUniqueApexVariationsForDeps to check ApexInfo.InApexes
instead of DepIsInSameApex to check if two modules are in the same
apex to account for a module that depends on another in a way that
doesn't normally include the dependency in the APEX (e.g. a libs
property), but the dependency is directly included in the APEX.
Bug: 164216768
Test: go test ./build/soong/apex/...
Change-Id: I2ae170601f764e5b88d0be2e0e6adc84e3a4d9cc
APEX variants that share the same SDK version and updatability
almost always use identical command line arguments to build but
with different intermediates directories. This causes unnecessary
build time and disk space for duplicated work.
Deduplicate APEX variants that would build identically. Create
aliases from the per-APEX variations to the new shared variations
so that the APEX modules can continue to depend on them via the
APEX name as the variation.
This has one significant change in behavior. Before this change,
if an APEX had two libraries in its direct dependencies and one
of those libraries depended on the other, and the second library
had stubs, then the first library would depend on the implementation
of the second library and not the stubs. After this change, if
the first library is also present in a second APEX but the second
library is not, then the common variant shared between the two
APEXes would use the stubs, not the implementation.
In a correctly configured set of build rules this change will
be irrelevant, because if the compilation worked for the second
APEX using stubs then it will work for the common variant using
stubs. However, if an incorrect change to the build rules is
made this could lead to confusing errors, as a previously-working
common variant could suddenly stop building when a module is added
to a new APEX without its dependencies that require implementation
APIs to compile.
This change reduces the number of modules in an AOSP arm64-userdebug
build by 3% (52242 to 50586), reduces the number of variants of the
libcutils module from 74 to 53, and reduces the number of variants
of the massive libart[d] modules from 44 to 32.
Bug: 164216768
Test: go test ./build/soong/apex/...
Change-Id: I0529837476a253c32b3dfb98dcccf107427c742c
In preparation for reusing the same variation for multiple apexes,
rename ApexName to ApexVariationName.
Bug: 164216768
Test: all soong tests
Change-Id: I88f2c5b192ffa27acd38e01952d0cefd413222a0
Remove ipmemorystore-aidl-interfaces-java in allowlist for
com.android.tethering
Bug: 146436251
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I8b7f97d59c2fd191f467ad50a8fd66d9a5d37704
When a vendor APEX sets use_vndk_as_stable: true, then the apex doesn't
bundle VNDK libraries but instead it uses them from the "vndk" namespace
at runtime.
":vndk" is a pseudo-name for VNDK libraries, which is processed by
linkerconfig so that the generated linker configuration allows the
namespace for the apex to access VNDK libs.
Bug: 159576928
Test: test with a test-only vendor apex
it runs okay with VNDK libs. (lsof shows that it opens libs from
VNDK APEX)
Change-Id: I924ce0fea696162575f59589b8f858deddf436b3
Vendor APEXes(in general, APEXes for non-system partitions) which is
supposed to be tied to a specific VNDK version can set this new property
so that it excludes VNDK libs and use them from VNDK APEX (provided by
system parition).
For these APEXes to use VNDK libs from VNDK APEX, linkerconfig should
link "vndk" linker namespace to the namespaces of these APEXes.
Bug: 159195575
Test: m (soong test added)
Change-Id: If90650973239ef7aab0ff084488bda57d9b0364e
This change fixes this error:
```
TARGET module com.android.adbd.flattened requires non-existent TARGET
module: prebuilt_libclang_rt.ubsan_standalone-arm-android
```
apexFile.moduleName is used as Make dependency name, so it should use
m.BaseModuleName() instead of m.Name(), because soong may prepend
"prebuilt_" to or mutate the output of m.Name() in other ways.
android/androidmk.go emits Android.mk modules with
`LOCAL_MODULE := module.BaseModuleName() + <SubName>`, so replace
apexFile.moduleName with BaseModuleName() + <SubName> as much as
possible.
Bug: 7456955
Test: Add unit test in apex/apex_test.go
Test: lunch blueline_hwasan && SANITIZE_TARGET='hwaddress fuzzer' m nothing
Test: Verify out/soong/Android-blueline_hwasan.mk
Change-Id: If8537fc1bedbe6c3405de3662a5df210a073c43f
Previously, an APEX variant was created for a module that was a member
of an SDK just in case it had to be replaced with an APEX requested
snapshotted version of that member. That was necessary because that was
the only way to have APEX specific replacements.
Since then a new method called ReplaceDependenciesIf() has been added
which provides fine grained control over which dependencies are
replaced. This change uses that new method to handle the replacements
which allows the APEX variants to be removed.
Bug: 161928524
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: If3869dd6753dc182b099af566b20fbc9c9c6eff7
apexDepsMutator marks all dependencies of apex modules. Previously, it
was converted from WalkDeps() to Top-down mutator to avoid the pitfall
of WalkDeps() bug. (It did't handle multiple visits via different
paths.)
Because WalkDeps() problem solved in aosp/1277516, apexDepsMutator can
be reverted to use WalkDeps().
Even though there's no observable difference between them, I revert this
for the up-coming change, which requires different pruning strategies
per apexes.
Bug: 159195575
Test: m
Change-Id: Ib09cbc7a3dfd143dd37b660b1aea6c71392ce2e3
prebuilt_apex has been disabled when the device is configured for
flattened APEXes, sanitized, instrumented, or built unbundled. However,
apex_set which is another type of APEX prebuilt wasn't disabled for the
same conditions.
This change fixes the discripency. apex_set modules are also force
disabled when the prebuilts are not expected.
Bug: 161316762
Bug: 160933444
Test: OVERRIDE_TARGET_FLATTEN_APEX=true m
The built image has only the flattened APEXes and the device boots
Change-Id: I6c90dfb28d565861a473a1bdce93269ec370601d
If prebuilts are active they will have the other direct dependencies
from the source modules.
Bug: 151303681
Test: m nothing
Test: `m` with prebuilts/runtime in the manifest (along with other
fixes)
Change-Id: I1ffc7e7b528ed9db5ce6ca2ee96c9d23c6548c49
apexBundle keeps the required dependencies for native modules which are
external dependencies and then records it in .mk file as
LOCAL_REQUIRED_MODULES key.
LOCAL_REQUIRED_MODULES should list module name which are made of
cc.BaseModuleName() + SubName.
By the way, because a use_vendor:true apex is supposed to be installed
in /system/apex, we don't append SubName(.vendor) suffix.
Bug: 159211312
Bug: 155841765
Test: m
Change-Id: Ifd2858dda0b373110a0cd18a0c55db41f0fc2a99
When an apex sets "vendor: true", it becomes a vendor apex.
Vendor apexes use vendor variants for native modules and are
installed in /vendor/apex.
Bug: 159211312
Test: m
Change-Id: I2585dd990ba857a2ab3ec6ab24e09d4652e867f2
This allows the unbundled master-art branch to still use flattened
APEXes in its test builds.
Bug: 159109002
Test: art/build/apex/runtests.sh on master-art
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I768c6b7f5afbc348cd7730e4ba96507678434778
apex_manifest.pb is added to payload.img by the build system and is
supposed to be read by apexd during activation.
So, it should be labeled as "system_file" so that apexd can read it
regardless of how file_contexts is defined.
Bug: 159767275
Test: add an apex with file_contexts with everything as vendor_file
apexd should activate the apex.
Change-Id: Ie34eb7ad905828976152d67a7dfabf0add0a5de4
Enforce min_sdk_version for every payload dependency of updatable
APEX/APKs.
android.CheckMinSdkVersion() calls ApexModule.ShouldSupportSdkVersion
for every transitive dependency from APEX/APK modules to see if it
meets the min_sdk_version requirements.
The common implementation for apex/android_app is provided in
android/apex.go.
Bug: 145796956
Bug: 152655956
Bug: 153333044
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I4a947dc94026df7cebd552b6e8ccdb4cc1f67170
Make uses NATIVE_COVERAGE to enable gcov coverage and CLANG_COVERAGE
to enable clang coverage. NATIVE_COVERAGE is translated to the Soong
Native_coverage product variable which triggers the native_coverage
clause in Android.bp files. The clause also needs to be triggered
for CLANG_COVERAGE.
Rename the existing Native_coverage product variable to GcovCoverage,
and regenerate Native_coverage when either GcovCoverage or
ClangCoverage are set.
Also remove NativeLineCoverage, it wasn't doing anything differently
than Native_coverage.
Bug: 159059537
Test: m checkbuild
Change-Id: I215124a9b35a2ad50ad562079d392e3d33da11f4
Because override_apex can modify the contents of the base apex,
allowed_files (which describes the contents) should be overridable.
Bug: 159503079
Bug: 159392784
Bug: 158169437
Test: m (soong test added)
Merged-In: I12744b0465dc3cfc90a66643867e65b4092cd0f7
Change-Id: I12744b0465dc3cfc90a66643867e65b4092cd0f7
(cherry picked from commit faa5399b3f)
Previously, when a boot jar was provided by a java_sdk_library_import
module the check-boot-jars check failed because the file it depended on
was not available. In an incremental build the build failed due to the
file in the out directory not having a rule to generate it.
That was because the module was named prebuilt_<module>.<apex> instead
of <module>.<apex>. This was fixed by simply removing prebuilt_ prefix
from the name if it was present.
After fixing that the check-boot-jars still did not work properly
because it was expecting a jar file containing .class files but instead
was given a jar file containing .dex files which meant the check did
not work properly.
This was fixed by defining a new ApexDependency interface for use by
the apex/apex.go code to use instead of java.Dependency for generating
the androidmk entries. The *SdkLibraryImport type then implemented
those, by delegating to the implementation library.
Bug: 158304459
Bug: 159112414
Test: m check-boot-jars
m checkbuild
manual inspection of the .jar file used by check-boot-jars to
ensure it contained .class files and not .dex files.
Change-Id: I545c5c9072dd472337d2f9b4dfdf08f53c981662
Merged-In: I545c5c9072dd472337d2f9b4dfdf08f53c981662
Because override_apex can modify the contents of the base apex,
allowed_files (which describes the contents) should be overridable.
Bug: 159503079
Bug: 159392784
Bug: 158169437
Test: m (soong test added)
Change-Id: I12744b0465dc3cfc90a66643867e65b4092cd0f7
Q+ and R+ mainline modules may only add code in a restricted set of Java
package prefixes, that may never be changed.
If a mainline module owns the Java package prefix "foo.bar", it may have
classes in "foo.bar", "foo.bar.baz", "foo.bar.baz.bat" etc.
Test: m
Bug: 156725734
Change-Id: I30bf510ed473309871469bf439d7c81575450931
Previously, when a boot jar was provided by a java_sdk_library_import
module the check-boot-jars check failed because the file it depended on
was not available. In an incremental build the build failed due to the
file in the out directory not having a rule to generate it.
That was because the module was named prebuilt_<module>.<apex> instead
of <module>.<apex>. This was fixed by simply removing prebuilt_ prefix
from the name if it was present.
After fixing that the check-boot-jars still did not work properly
because it was expecting a jar file containing .class files but instead
was given a jar file containing .dex files which meant the check did
not work properly.
This was fixed by defining a new ApexDependency interface for use by
the apex/apex.go code to use instead of java.Dependency for generating
the androidmk entries. The *SdkLibraryImport type then implemented
those, by delegating to the implementation library.
Bug: 158304459
Bug: 159112414
Test: m check-boot-jars
m checkbuild
manual inspection of the .jar file used by check-boot-jars to
ensure it contained .class files and not .dex files.
Change-Id: I545c5c9072dd472337d2f9b4dfdf08f53c981662
If a java_sdk_library_import has a corresponding java_sdk_library then
make the java_sdk_library_import export both the xml and impl modules
created by the java_sdk_library.
Makes java_sdk_library_import consistent with java_sdk_library by
providing libraries within the same APEX access to the implementation
library instead of the stubs.
Bug: 158304459
Test: m nothing
Test what happens when building com.android.tethering with and without
a preferred "framework-tethering" java_sdk_library_import. Make sure that
it does not change the generated APEX.
Merged-In: I2f4edea937ac377431a5696c92cbd467bded62ef
Change-Id: I2f4edea937ac377431a5696c92cbd467bded62ef
(cherry picked from commit eedc5d55ce)
If a java_sdk_library_import has a corresponding java_sdk_library then
make the java_sdk_library_import export both the xml and impl modules
created by the java_sdk_library.
Makes java_sdk_library_import consistent with java_sdk_library by
providing libraries within the same APEX access to the implementation
library instead of the stubs.
Bug: 158304459
Test: m nothing
Test what happens when building com.android.tethering with and without
a preferred "framework-tethering" java_sdk_library_import. Make sure that
it does not change the generated APEX.
Change-Id: I2f4edea937ac377431a5696c92cbd467bded62ef
While libz has stubs for other mainline modules, it doesn't provide
stubs when it is used as a VNDK lib.
In general, VNDK libs are only for vendor modules. So, we skip them even
if they have stubs.
Bug: 155456180
Test: m com.android.vndk.current
provideNativeLibs of the APEX should be empty
Change-Id: I22401a2b1732a8560802c5be850181682e183a8e
This reverts commit b0dc851ff4.
Reason for revert: relanding original change. Build failures were
caused by a race with another CL: https://r.android.com/1320920
Test: lunch aosp_cf_x86_phone-userdebug && m
Change-Id: Ic9016582dae7773b4d4f84a63425f1ef7a5d061f
This is a prerequisite change before adding DexJarInstallPath.
Test: lunch aosp_cf_phone-userdebug && m
Change-Id: I033e08b8bb06c0a844a6bbbfcdc48ce33e9c95cf
Give prebuilt_etc and sh_binary their own packages and split the
gigantic main Android.bp up to small, per-package ones.
(This is a cherry-pick change.)
Test: m nothing, TreeHugger
Bug: 156980228
Change-Id: I7b00cd344b9f16861f1ff39edf0029f016b853d0
Merged-In: I7b00cd344b9f16861f1ff39edf0029f016b853d0
Give prebuilt_etc and sh_binary their own packages and split the
gigantic main Android.bp up to small, per-package ones.
Test: m nothing, TreeHugger
Bug: 156980228
Change-Id: I7b00cd344b9f16861f1ff39edf0029f016b853d0
apex now respects stem of java_library modules.
As a follow-up we need to suppor the same for other types of modules.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from AOSP
Bug: 157638999
Test: m
Merged-In: Iaf5023020b5440f1ffd4f5414b5a7864655fc22a
(cherry picked from commit a62aa23990)
Change-Id: Iaf5023020b5440f1ffd4f5414b5a7864655fc22a
apex now respects stem of java_library modules.
As a follow-up we need to suppor the same for other types of modules.
Bug: 157638999
Test: m
Change-Id: Iaf5023020b5440f1ffd4f5414b5a7864655fc22a
The marked library(ies) were available to the APEX via the
hand-written whitelist in build/soong/apex/apex.go. Trying to remove the
whitelist by adding apex_available property to the Android.bp of the
libraries.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from internal
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Merged-In: I2b792657b444f0c963e1e92b7c91f6a0cfe1688c
(cherry picked from commit be6e2b6a18)
Change-Id: I2b792657b444f0c963e1e92b7c91f6a0cfe1688c
Introduce a singleton apex rule to merge contents of individual
deps-info results into a single output file.
Bug: 149622332
Test: m
Change-Id: I4ab7e1a3527fead97a81a5a2cb0e1e93a429117c
Merged-In: I4ab7e1a3527fead97a81a5a2cb0e1e93a429117c
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
(cherry picked from commit 849f844252)
For a given variant of a module that implements ApexModule interface,
the "updatable" property tests if this variant comes from an updatable
apex. For platform variants it is always false.
Test: lunch aosp_walleye-userdebug && m nothing
Bug: 138994281
Merged-In: I2d4c54fb397e29dc9b3203be7fb17be4536529f7
Change-Id: I2d4c54fb397e29dc9b3203be7fb17be4536529f7
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
(cherry picked from commit 7c140d828a)
This reverts commit c9c7116721.
This revert is to avoid merge conflict when ag/11299431 is auto-merged
to master.
This change will again be reverted when ag/11299431 lands.
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Change-Id: Ia0f7a0e0eb8cf6f6f4d0693de01777a8a750c769
The marked library(ies) were available to the APEX via the
hand-written whitelist in build/soong/apex/apex.go. Trying to remove the
whitelist by adding apex_available property to the Android.bp of the
libraries.
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Change-Id: I2b792657b444f0c963e1e92b7c91f6a0cfe1688c
The android_library module type can be used within an android_app that
can itself be added to an apex but android_library does not call
android.InitApexModule(module) and so it does not support apex variants
and so is treated as if it cannot be part of an APEX even though it
actually is.
Now, android_library supports AEPX variants.
Due to this change, the whilelist for apex_available got bigger.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from internal
Bug: 156978407
Test: m
Merged-In: I3a21d653fe9c4159e3a89791fe1a8597865eeae6
Change-Id: I3a21d653fe9c4159e3a89791fe1a8597865eeae6
(cherry picked from commit bd133b1bdc)
The android_library module type can be used within an android_app that
can itself be added to an apex but android_library does not call
android.InitApexModule(module) and so it does not support apex variants
and so is treated as if it cannot be part of an APEX even though it
actually is.
Now, android_library supports AEPX variants.
Due to this change, the whilelist for apex_available got bigger.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: approved in rvc-dev
Bug: 156978407
Test: m
Merged-In: I3a21d653fe9c4159e3a89791fe1a8597865eeae6
Change-Id: I3a21d653fe9c4159e3a89791fe1a8597865eeae6
The android_library module type can be used within an android_app that
can itself be added to an apex but android_library does not call
android.InitApexModule(module) and so it does not support apex variants
and so is treated as if it cannot be part of an APEX even though it
actually is.
Now, android_library supports AEPX variants.
Due to this change, the whilelist for apex_available got bigger.
Bug: 156978407
Test: m
Merged-In: I3a21d653fe9c4159e3a89791fe1a8597865eeae6
Change-Id: I3a21d653fe9c4159e3a89791fe1a8597865eeae6
The marked library(ies) were available to the APEX via the
hand-written whitelist in build/soong/apex/apex.go. Trying to remove the
whitelist by adding apex_available property to the Android.bp of the
libraries.
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Merged-In: I827d604c7e5a469a8b8a6d5a4b7917f2eaca48ca
Change-Id: I827d604c7e5a469a8b8a6d5a4b7917f2eaca48ca
apex_set takes an .apks file that contains a set of prebuilt apexes with
different configurations. It uses extract_apks to select and install the
best matching one for the current target.
Bug: 153456259
Test: apex_test.go
Test: com.android.media.apks
Change-Id: I1da8bbcf1611b7c580a0cb225856cbd7029cc0a7
Merged-In: I1da8bbcf1611b7c580a0cb225856cbd7029cc0a7
Introduce a singleton apex rule to merge contents of individual
deps-info results into a single output file.
Bug: 149622332
Test: m
Change-Id: I4ab7e1a3527fead97a81a5a2cb0e1e93a429117c
Colin Cross