Product variables structs are generated at runtime to contain only
the properties that apply to the current module. Defaults modules
always contained all product variable properties. Defaults modules
apply their properties to the target module using
proptools.PrependProperties, which prepends structs that have
matching types. Filtered property structs had a different type
and were dropped.
Even after adding filtering to the defaults product variable
properties, defaults modules may contain more property structs
than the target module they are applied to, so the product
variables struct for the defaults module could contain more
fields than the product variables struct for the target module.
Use proptools.PrependMatchingProperties when applying defaults
of product variables instead, which will apply matching properties
across types.
Test: defaults_test.go
Test: variable_test.go
Change-Id: I281bdefef92053457a3b7b65383493a4e7d999df
The zero value check was being done by using reflect.DeepEqual on a
field from the default product variables, but this results in
comparison against a random type when the product variables struct
for the module has been filtered down. Luckily this will always
fail false, which just removed and optimization but left the
behavior correct.
Use reflect.IsZero instead, which is both faster and correct.
Test: variable_test.go
Change-Id: Ieaaa590c2788ca39230e6695397e8ba8d1c6c103
Soong config variables come from Make where they might be capitalized,
but Blueprint didn't handle capitalized variables well. Add test
coverage for capitalized Soong config variables.
Bug: 148865218
Test: soong_config_module_test.go
Change-Id: I1e434e392d5ee660a221a0d3f959811c35e65865
Add a dependency on the Soong config module definition file in case
it wasn't called Android.bp.
Fixes: 148866376
Test: m checkbuild
Change-Id: Ib441881bcee52fd1dc3a8d1c5ae4f5f0b7efe3ce
This change fixes a bug that apex_available is not enforced for static
dependencies. For example, a module with 'apex_available:
["//apex_available:platform"]' was able to be statically linked to any
APEX. This was happening because the check was done on the modules that
are actually installed to an APEX. Static dependencies of the modules
were not counted as they are not installed to the APEX as files.
Fixing this bug by doing the check by traversing the tree in the method
checkApexAvailability.
This change includes a few number of related changes:
1) DepIsInSameApex implementation for cc.Module was changed as well.
Previuosly, it returned false only when the dependency is actually a
stub variant of a lib. Now, it returns false when the dependency has one
or more stub variants. To understand why, we need to recall that when
there is a dependency to a lib having stubs, we actually create two
dependencies: to the non-stub variant and to the stub variant during the
DepsMutator phase. And later in the build action generation phase, we
choose one of them depending on the context. Also recall that an APEX
variant is created only when DepIsInSameApex returns true. Given these,
with the previous implementatin of DepIsInSameApex, we did create apex
variants of the non-stub variant of the dependency, while not creating
the apex variant for the stub variant. This is not right; we needlessly
created the apex variant. The extra apex variant has caused no harm so
far, but since the apex_available check became more correct, it actually
breaks the build. To fix the issue, we stop creating the APEX variant
both for non-stub and stub variants.
2) platform variant is created regardless of the apex_available value.
This is required for the case when a library X that provides stub is in
an APEX A and is configured to be available only for A. In that case,
libs in other APEX can't use the stub library since the stub library is
mutated only for apex A. By creating the platform variant for the stub
library, it can be used from outside as the default dependency variation
is set to the platform variant when creating the APEX variations.
3) The ApexAvailableWhitelist is added with the dependencies that were
revealed with this change.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from internal
Bug: 147671264
Test: m
Merged-In: Iaedc05494085ff4e8af227a6392bdd0c338b8e6e
(cherry picked from commit fa89944c79)
Change-Id: Iaedc05494085ff4e8af227a6392bdd0c338b8e6e
This change fixes a bug that apex_available is not enforced for static
dependencies. For example, a module with 'apex_available:
["//apex_available:platform"]' was able to be statically linked to any
APEX. This was happening because the check was done on the modules that
are actually installed to an APEX. Static dependencies of the modules
were not counted as they are not installed to the APEX as files.
Fixing this bug by doing the check by traversing the tree in the method
checkApexAvailability.
This change includes a few number of related changes:
1) DepIsInSameApex implementation for cc.Module was changed as well.
Previuosly, it returned false only when the dependency is actually a
stub variant of a lib. Now, it returns false when the dependency has one
or more stub variants. To understand why, we need to recall that when
there is a dependency to a lib having stubs, we actually create two
dependencies: to the non-stub variant and to the stub variant during the
DepsMutator phase. And later in the build action generation phase, we
choose one of them depending on the context. Also recall that an APEX
variant is created only when DepIsInSameApex returns true. Given these,
with the previous implementatin of DepIsInSameApex, we did create apex
variants of the non-stub variant of the dependency, while not creating
the apex variant for the stub variant. This is not right; we needlessly
created the apex variant. The extra apex variant has caused no harm so
far, but since the apex_available check became more correct, it actually
breaks the build. To fix the issue, we stop creating the APEX variant
both for non-stub and stub variants.
2) platform variant is created regardless of the apex_available value.
This is required for the case when a library X that provides stub is in
an APEX A and is configured to be available only for A. In that case,
libs in other APEX can't use the stub library since the stub library is
mutated only for apex A. By creating the platform variant for the stub
library, it can be used from outside as the default dependency variation
is set to the platform variant when creating the APEX variations.
3) The ApexAvailableWhitelist is added with the dependencies that were
revealed with this change.
Bug: 147671264
Test: m
Change-Id: Iaedc05494085ff4e8af227a6392bdd0c338b8e6e
Previously, the java_sdk_library had special support for disabling the
stubs library when the build was configured to use prebuilts for sdks,
e.g. in an unbundled app build. That caused the prebuilt version of the
stubs library to be used instead. The disabling was done irrespective
of whether a prebuilt was available which prevents java_sdk_library
from being used in situations when prebuilts are not available, e.g.
when they have not been created yet.
This change moves the logic into tha java_sdk_library_import and
leverages the existing prebuilt/prefer mechanism to ensure that the
prebuilt version is used when required.
* Adds a ForcePrefer() method to Prebuilt to allow a module to forcibly
set the value of the prefer property.
* Sets prefer true on the java_sdk_library_import and the stubs modules
it creates when the prebuilt version should be used.
* Refactors PrebuiltJars for use by both java_sdk_library and
java_sdk_library_import as they both need to provide access to
prebuilts for previously released versions of the library.
* Removes disabling logic from java_sdk_library.
This will probably require some additional java_sdk_library_import
modules to be added to prebuilts/sdk/current/Android.bp.
Bug: 148080325
Test: m droid && TARGET_BUILD_APPS=Camera2 m
Change-Id: I0b5f751e82a2179a967ae64ca03dc9b9e7665c16
This is the 1st part of the CL. It adds support to enable compilation
of line coverage instrumented binaries. For more details please refer
to the design doc: go/android-line-coverage-doc
Bug: b/147604881
Test: Code works successfully on Taimen devices
Change-Id: I07745c1438b611041ed032dd4b7788cb50130845
Moves the struct to android/sdk.go and abstracts it behind a factory
method and interface. That allows it to be used outside the sdk
package.
This change is in preparation for adding support for module types that
have transitive sdk members.
Bug: 142940300
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I71e5e0adf839b28a3a0952f82637637887f02688
This is preparation for enhancing the versioning tranformer to support
applying per property transformations. Specifically, to allow
properties to reference other libraries within the sdk.
Bug: 142940300
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I99cdff4b407763ed395ff358d8110a63c6cf5589
In an AOSP aosp_blueline-userdebub build, OutputPath.String was
allocating 802MB of strings in filepath.Join to prepend the
out dir to each path. Allocate the joined string in PathForOutput
instead, which results in ~57MB of new allocations in PathForOutput
but no allocations in OutputPath.String.
Test: all soong tests
Change-Id: Id452e0c46a2aeda71bfac11a227bb6edb8e3523d
This is to support enabling scudo only for non-svelte configs.
Also, add exclude_static_libs to allow removing the jemalloc libs.
Bug: 137795072
Test: Verified that a svelte and non-svelte config can use this method
Test: to properly choose between scudo and jemalloc.
Change-Id: Iec6bfe159f8491138e93dde1d225a8c874c7ce31
This CL adds RBE support to javac, r8, and d8 rules which is only
enabled if respective environment variables are set.
Test: an aosp_crosshatch build with and without the new variables.
Change-Id: Ic82f3627944f6a5ee7b9f3228170c2709b1bfcb8
The value format that sdk_version (and min_sdk_version, etc.) can have
has consistently evolved and is quite complicated. Furthermore, with the
Mainline module effort, we are expected to have more sdk_versions like
'module-app-current', 'module-lib-current', etc.
The goal of this change is to abstract the various sdk versions, which
are currently represented in string and is parsed in various places,
into a type called sdkSpec, so that adding new sdk veresions becomes
easier than before.
The sdk_version string is now parsed in only one place 'SdkSpecFrom', in
which it is converted into the sdkSpec struct. The struct type provides
several methods that again converts sdkSpec into context-specific
information such as the effective version number, etc.
Bug: 146757305
Bug: 147879031
Test: m
Change-Id: I252f3706544f00ea71c61c23460f07561dd28ab0