cc_library_static {
name: "libfoo",
shared_libs: ["libbar"],
}
cc_library {
name: "libbar",
}
If libfoo is part of an APEX, then libbar is no longer considered as a
member of the APEX, because it isn't actually linked to libfoo.
To distinguish such a shared lib dependency from a static library from a
shared lib dependency from a shared library, a new dep type
SharedFromStaticDepTag is introduced. It is treated exactly the same as
SharedDepTag, except when we determine whether a dependency is crossing
the APEX boundary or not.
This allows us to check the apex_available property more correctly.
Previously, modules were incorrectly considered as being used for an
APEX due to the shared lib dependency from a static lib.
As a good side effect, this also reduces the number of APEX variants.
Specifically, on aosp_arm64, the number of the generated modules were
reduced from 44745 to 44180.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from internal
Bug: 147671264
Test: m
Merged-In: I899ccb9eae1574effef77ca1bc3a0df145983861
(cherry picked from commit 931b676a69)
Change-Id: I899ccb9eae1574effef77ca1bc3a0df145983861
This change fixes a bug that apex_available is not enforced for static
dependencies. For example, a module with 'apex_available:
["//apex_available:platform"]' was able to be statically linked to any
APEX. This was happening because the check was done on the modules that
are actually installed to an APEX. Static dependencies of the modules
were not counted as they are not installed to the APEX as files.
Fixing this bug by doing the check by traversing the tree in the method
checkApexAvailability.
This change includes a few number of related changes:
1) DepIsInSameApex implementation for cc.Module was changed as well.
Previuosly, it returned false only when the dependency is actually a
stub variant of a lib. Now, it returns false when the dependency has one
or more stub variants. To understand why, we need to recall that when
there is a dependency to a lib having stubs, we actually create two
dependencies: to the non-stub variant and to the stub variant during the
DepsMutator phase. And later in the build action generation phase, we
choose one of them depending on the context. Also recall that an APEX
variant is created only when DepIsInSameApex returns true. Given these,
with the previous implementatin of DepIsInSameApex, we did create apex
variants of the non-stub variant of the dependency, while not creating
the apex variant for the stub variant. This is not right; we needlessly
created the apex variant. The extra apex variant has caused no harm so
far, but since the apex_available check became more correct, it actually
breaks the build. To fix the issue, we stop creating the APEX variant
both for non-stub and stub variants.
2) platform variant is created regardless of the apex_available value.
This is required for the case when a library X that provides stub is in
an APEX A and is configured to be available only for A. In that case,
libs in other APEX can't use the stub library since the stub library is
mutated only for apex A. By creating the platform variant for the stub
library, it can be used from outside as the default dependency variation
is set to the platform variant when creating the APEX variations.
3) The ApexAvailableWhitelist is added with the dependencies that were
revealed with this change.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from internal
Bug: 147671264
Test: m
Merged-In: Iaedc05494085ff4e8af227a6392bdd0c338b8e6e
(cherry picked from commit fa89944c79)
Change-Id: Iaedc05494085ff4e8af227a6392bdd0c338b8e6e
This reverts commit a952495643.
Reason for revert: PermissionController may need to be built outside of APEX
Fixes: 148957736
Change-Id: I80a2cd666ea5028741250dd2cebf2bd7d7b331ad
apex {
name: "myapex",
native_shared_libs: ["libfoo"],
apex_name: "apex_name",
}
override_apex {
name: "myapex.override",
base: "myapex"
}
Previsouly, above wasn't supported because both APEXes have the same
apex_name and that apex_name is used as the suffix of libfoo. i.e.,
there are two libfoo.apex_name modules defined.
Now, the two apex variants of libfoo are named as
libfoo.myapex and libfoo.myapex.override.
Bug: 140136207
Test: m
Change-Id: I63f8a1de463011c6e0b97f5f6eee83103e22bc30
cc_library_static {
name: "libfoo",
shared_libs: ["libbar"],
}
cc_library {
name: "libbar",
}
If libfoo is part of an APEX, then libbar is no longer considered as a
member of the APEX, because it isn't actually linked to libfoo.
To distinguish such a shared lib dependency from a static library from a
shared lib dependency from a shared library, a new dep type
SharedFromStaticDepTag is introduced. It is treated exactly the same as
SharedDepTag, except when we determine whether a dependency is crossing
the APEX boundary or not.
This allows us to check the apex_available property more correctly.
Previously, modules were incorrectly considered as being used for an
APEX due to the shared lib dependency from a static lib.
As a good side effect, this also reduces the number of APEX variants.
Specifically, on aosp_arm64, the number of the generated modules were
reduced from 44745 to 44180.
Bug: 147671264
Test: m
Change-Id: I899ccb9eae1574effef77ca1bc3a0df145983861
This change fixes a bug that apex_available is not enforced for static
dependencies. For example, a module with 'apex_available:
["//apex_available:platform"]' was able to be statically linked to any
APEX. This was happening because the check was done on the modules that
are actually installed to an APEX. Static dependencies of the modules
were not counted as they are not installed to the APEX as files.
Fixing this bug by doing the check by traversing the tree in the method
checkApexAvailability.
This change includes a few number of related changes:
1) DepIsInSameApex implementation for cc.Module was changed as well.
Previuosly, it returned false only when the dependency is actually a
stub variant of a lib. Now, it returns false when the dependency has one
or more stub variants. To understand why, we need to recall that when
there is a dependency to a lib having stubs, we actually create two
dependencies: to the non-stub variant and to the stub variant during the
DepsMutator phase. And later in the build action generation phase, we
choose one of them depending on the context. Also recall that an APEX
variant is created only when DepIsInSameApex returns true. Given these,
with the previous implementatin of DepIsInSameApex, we did create apex
variants of the non-stub variant of the dependency, while not creating
the apex variant for the stub variant. This is not right; we needlessly
created the apex variant. The extra apex variant has caused no harm so
far, but since the apex_available check became more correct, it actually
breaks the build. To fix the issue, we stop creating the APEX variant
both for non-stub and stub variants.
2) platform variant is created regardless of the apex_available value.
This is required for the case when a library X that provides stub is in
an APEX A and is configured to be available only for A. In that case,
libs in other APEX can't use the stub library since the stub library is
mutated only for apex A. By creating the platform variant for the stub
library, it can be used from outside as the default dependency variation
is set to the platform variant when creating the APEX variations.
3) The ApexAvailableWhitelist is added with the dependencies that were
revealed with this change.
Bug: 147671264
Test: m
Change-Id: Iaedc05494085ff4e8af227a6392bdd0c338b8e6e
apex module accepts PlatformCompatConfigIntf as prebuilt,
and places it in the etc folder of the apex.
Test: m
Test: flash device with dummy config in mediaprovider APEX -
the config is present
Change-Id: Ifc62cd262f6c6571c1bf6c2943879aa20877ecad
Previously, the java_sdk_library had special support for disabling the
stubs library when the build was configured to use prebuilts for sdks,
e.g. in an unbundled app build. That caused the prebuilt version of the
stubs library to be used instead. The disabling was done irrespective
of whether a prebuilt was available which prevents java_sdk_library
from being used in situations when prebuilts are not available, e.g.
when they have not been created yet.
This change moves the logic into tha java_sdk_library_import and
leverages the existing prebuilt/prefer mechanism to ensure that the
prebuilt version is used when required.
* Adds a ForcePrefer() method to Prebuilt to allow a module to forcibly
set the value of the prefer property.
* Sets prefer true on the java_sdk_library_import and the stubs modules
it creates when the prebuilt version should be used.
* Refactors PrebuiltJars for use by both java_sdk_library and
java_sdk_library_import as they both need to provide access to
prebuilts for previously released versions of the library.
* Removes disabling logic from java_sdk_library.
This will probably require some additional java_sdk_library_import
modules to be added to prebuilts/sdk/current/Android.bp.
Bug: 148080325
Test: m droid && TARGET_BUILD_APPS=Camera2 m
Change-Id: I0b5f751e82a2179a967ae64ca03dc9b9e7665c16
Some additional, possibly arch specific, properties need adding to
cc library (e.g. recovery_available). This dedups and cleans up the
code involved to simply the addition of those new properties.
Bug: 142918168
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I0963aa02e9504af1ae9b427ff1016e7c481465f4
When SOONG_ALLOW_MISSING_DEPENDENCIES is set, it should be OK to miss
shared library variants.
Test: master-art manifest, use bionic stubs
Bug: 142935992
Change-Id: Ie0054acfef7c4406594a87378a7029380a9fda50
Nicolas Geoffray