apex now respects stem of java_library modules.
As a follow-up we need to suppor the same for other types of modules.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from AOSP
Bug: 157638999
Test: m
Merged-In: Iaf5023020b5440f1ffd4f5414b5a7864655fc22a
(cherry picked from commit a62aa23990)
Change-Id: Iaf5023020b5440f1ffd4f5414b5a7864655fc22a
I made a mistake and only fixed android_test_import in my previous
change, I5bbb2d2b733bbd6b868898285683ba5ff45be10b.
(This is a cherry-pick change.)
Bug: 154281342
Test: TreeHugger
Test: chromium-webview
Change-Id: I1575d9ef3f8596f1eb8db0867db09de08945d711
Merged-In: I1575d9ef3f8596f1eb8db0867db09de08945d711
Most dependencies on java_sdk_library instances (JSL) simply reference
them by name and rely on the build to pick the correct part, impl,
stubs for a specific scope, headers or implementation jars or dex jars.
Generally, the build gets that decision right. If it does not the for
most of the components of the JSL there is a way to reference them
directly. However, that is not true for the implementation library as
that is created the JSL itself.
Access to the implementation library should be avoided as it opens up
the possibility that use will be made of an API that is not tracked and
maintained which could lead to compatibility issues. However, there is
a case where use of the implementation library is required and safe.
That is when it is being used from other libraries within the same APEX
as the JSL. In that case the JSL and its dependencies will be updated
together so compatibility is not an issue.
This change adds a new <module>.impl java_library that compiles the
implementation library in the same way as the JSL itself does. This will
allow the modules that are blocked from converting to JSL because of
this limitation to progress. Initially the library is only for use
for compiling but follow up changes will switch the rest of the build
from using the implementation library created by JSL to the separate
module.
It also adds the ability to give the separate .impl library a more
restrictive visibility than the JSL further limiting misuse.
Bug: 156618935
Test: m droid, flash, atest CtsProviderTestCases - sniff test
tested that it fixes compilation issues with mainline module
Merged-In: Ifc4799feb4ada9dec8021efc13fe6a953bf2edd3
Change-Id: Ifc4799feb4ada9dec8021efc13fe6a953bf2edd3
(cherry picked from commit 5df793011d)
Introduce a singleton apex rule to merge contents of individual
deps-info results into a single output file.
Bug: 149622332
Test: m
Change-Id: I4ab7e1a3527fead97a81a5a2cb0e1e93a429117c
Merged-In: I4ab7e1a3527fead97a81a5a2cb0e1e93a429117c
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
(cherry picked from commit 849f844252)
For a given variant of a module that implements ApexModule interface,
the "updatable" property tests if this variant comes from an updatable
apex. For platform variants it is always false.
Test: lunch aosp_walleye-userdebug && m nothing
Bug: 138994281
Merged-In: I2d4c54fb397e29dc9b3203be7fb17be4536529f7
Change-Id: I2d4c54fb397e29dc9b3203be7fb17be4536529f7
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
(cherry picked from commit 7c140d828a)
Previously, droiddoc was using SdkImplementationJars() to get a JAR to
add to the classpath in order to resolve unknown references in the
source.
Given that SdkHeaderJars() returns jars created by Turbine which are
(for compilation at least) functionally identical to the implementation
jars there is no point in using the implementation jars.
Bug: 148080325
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: I2b718cc1445c04e849dcb0b1f53bba2b0bd90c95
Change-Id: I2b718cc1445c04e849dcb0b1f53bba2b0bd90c95
(cherry picked from commit 649dadfb87)
Access to the implementation JARs is restricted to avoid code from
depending on implementation details that could change from one release
to the next which could cause compatibility issues. That is not a
problem when referenced from within the APEX that contains the
java_sdk_library.
As references from within the same APEX often need to access
implementation specific details of the java_sdk_library and doing that
from within the same APEX is safe this change all references to a
java_sdk_library made within the same APEX to use the implementation
jars instead of stub jars.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m droid
Change-Id: If239059690de61683c2ad2d8a0ce2e47286a3637
(cherry picked from commit 9b879594ed)
The implementation jars are not built if api_only: true. In that case
the jar paths must not be exposed implicitly as they will be nil and
they will just be ignored.
This change ensures that stubs are returned when the implementation
jars are not built.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m droid
Change-Id: Ic495982a5dcb2754916260e7d91d921a5da288ae
(cherry picked from commit daaa332827)
The expression !sdkVersion.specified() is equivalent to the following:
!sdkVersion.valid() || sdkVersion.kind == sdkPrivate
That means that the else if clause "sdkVersion.kind == sdkPrivate" will
never be reached so it was removed.
There is also no need to check sdkVersion.valid() as that will already
have been checked, and an error reported, before this code has been
called. Therefore that has been removed.
Bug: 148080325
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: Ib7c544b48dfb53bad3e15f9f73f71bd05cff9b49
Change-Id: Ib7c544b48dfb53bad3e15f9f73f71bd05cff9b49
(cherry picked from commit c91f5d0cc7)
Module stubs compile against module_current, so any module depending on
them had to compile against module_current (or broader) too. Treat them
as the API surface the stubs are for.
Bug: 157010342
Test: m
Change-Id: I49b9082dc1b5afe6c22e94126e574dd8061f0f39
Previously, all java_sdk_library instances were assumed to be usable as
shared libraries, i.e. referenced from <uses-library> in Android
manifest. However, that was not true for any instances that specified
api_only: true and will not be true for many of the new Android
modules.
One consequence of this assumption is that use of one of the api_only
instances could (but fortunately does not appear to) have lead to an
invalid library being referenced in an app's manifest which would
prevent the app from loading. That would have been done automatically
by the implicit sdk library tracking and manifest fixing mechanism and
there would have been nothing a developer could have done about it.
Changes:
1) Prevents api_only instances from participating in the automatic
tracking which will prevent them from being added to Android
manifests and breaking apps.
2) Add a new shared_library property that can have the same effect as
api_only while still creating a runtime implementation library.
3) Renamed commonProperties to commonSdkLibraryProperties to
disambiguate it from the ModuleBase.commonProperties field.
4) Extracts requiresRuntimeImplementationLibrary() to remove duplicate
code accessing the Api_only property.
5) Tests for the api_only and shared_library behaviours.
Test: m nothing - added tests, tests broke, fixed code, tests passed.
Bug: 156723295
(cherry picked from commit dfa131e673)
Change-Id: I06b3444ced00fd7b54068352187684171024c679
The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are
referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that
includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate
<uses-library> entry in their manifest.
Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that:
1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module
itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs
module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it
possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be
available at runtime.
2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library
was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow
java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should
be treated as an Android shared library.
3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances
which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set
api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the
actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change.
Changes:
* Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into
java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides
the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an
SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any
references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to
the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked.
* Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented
SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the
OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the
sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return
nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked.
* Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is
a better place for it to be.
* Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize
the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating
module.
* Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the
java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be
tracked too.
* Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both
java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly.
Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock
being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken
anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest.
m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the
code.
Bug: 156723295
(cherry picked from commit 859fe961b0)
Change-Id: I760a9ac72856e3a07a497ce40db70c7e70106837
The stubs header jar is optimized for use as a dependency for others
to use. It only changes if there is a significant difference in the
externals of the classes, i.e. anything that a library being compiled
against depends upon. So changes to implementations of method or the
addition/removal of private methods, fields will have no impact.
As there is no benefit in returning the implementation of the stubs
jar this change removes it. The implementation is still used when
taking a snapshot as the header jar is an internal build artefact
that is not suitable for long term snapshot.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m droid
(cherry picked from commit 23970f4285)
Change-Id: I8277ec643837514d74cb57ad4f236ceb1f5c6c5b
Previously, in order to access say the public stubs source jar it was
necessary to directly reference the module by name. This change adds
support for accessing them indirectly via tags.
Test: nothing
Bug: 155164730
(cherry picked from commit 46dc45aba9)
Change-Id: Icc21caee5b4b1da6f958470bd7bae8a37933f24b
The scopePaths struct is used by both java_sdk_library and its prebuilt
but was not populated in the same way. This change addresses those
discrepancies in preparation for a follow up change which will allow
access to some of those fields through OutputFileProvider.
Changes:
* Document the scopePaths field and struct.
* Switch those fields that may not be fully populated from Paths to
OptionalPath to make that 100% clear and protect against unchecked
use.
* Switch java_sdk_library_import to use the dependency extraction
mechanism driven by the dependency tag. This should actually have
been part of the change that added that mechanism.
* Only create prebuilt_stubs_sources if sources have been provided.
* Add dependencies from java_sdk_library_import on its stubs source
child modules if sources have been provided. That will ensure the
stubsSrcJar field is updated.
* Updates current/removedApiFilePath if provided for the scope in
java_sdk_library_import.
* Extracts ApiStubsSrcProvider from ApiStubsProvider to allow it to
be implemented by PrebuiltStubsSources so that it can provide access
to the stubs src jar that it creates.
Test: m nothing
Bug: 148080325
Bug: 155164730
(cherry picked from commit 0f8faffdc0)
Change-Id: Ib56ca608d6fc1357d3d89e9c4cfed6ff8da11735
Previously, when using sdk_version: "module_current" any direct
reference to an sdk library would use the public not module-lib stubs.
This change corrects that.
Prior to the addition of the module-lib api scope almost all
java_sdk_library instances supported all the scopes to which a request
for jars could be redirected, i.e. public, system and test. The
exceptions to that are a few special instances that were used with
sdk_version: "none" and so were either caught by the java_sdk_library
special cases or dropped through to public.
The addition of module-lib, plus the flexible control over which scopes
are generated means that is no longer true. It is possible for a
java_sdk_library to be requested for a scope it does not have which
would have resulted in an empty set of paths being returned leading to
confusing compilation errors.
To avoid that this change also adds support for using the inheritance
hierarchy defined by the apiScope.extends field to fall back to the
closest available surface.
Test: m nothing
Bug: 155164730
(cherry picked from commit 803a9565cd)
Change-Id: I89a0abf4033209f9a104285c990096bc0b4a0255
The java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import redirect a request for
header and implementation jars to broadly the same place although the
java_sdk_library does have some special code that is mixed in with the
common code.
This change separates the java_sdk_library special code from the common
code and moves the common code into its own method for use by both
module types. That makes the special behavior clearer and ensures the
common behavior remains consistent in future.
Test: m nothing
Bug: 155164730
(cherry picked from commit b05d4295de)
Change-Id: Id21cc74d2d37c5a75983fdcd7393f6a37f8872c9
If set to true, preprocessed indicates that the prebuilt apk is
installable as is and does not need any further processing (e.g.
zipaligning, signing).
(This is a cherry pick.)
Test: app_test.go
Bug: 155412211
Merged-In: If0c27c1e340c1bdb270064f636dc6bf33a0fc949
Change-Id: If0c27c1e340c1bdb270064f636dc6bf33a0fc949
ART tests need to explicitly control the compression.
Bug: 157239179
Test: "atest ArtGtestsTarget" with http://go/aog/1302773
Change-Id: I4490aa0a61fa71f830feb6a46dffd8d20fccfc66
Previously, all java_sdk_library instances were assumed to be usable as
shared libraries, i.e. referenced from <uses-library> in Android
manifest. However, that was not true for any instances that specified
api_only: true and will not be true for many of the new Android
modules.
One consequence of this assumption is that use of one of the api_only
instances could (but fortunately does not appear to) have lead to an
invalid library being referenced in an app's manifest which would
prevent the app from loading. That would have been done automatically
by the implicit sdk library tracking and manifest fixing mechanism and
there would have been nothing a developer could have done about it.
Changes:
1) Prevents api_only instances from participating in the automatic
tracking which will prevent them from being added to Android
manifests and breaking apps.
2) Add a new shared_library property that can have the same effect as
api_only while still creating a runtime implementation library.
3) Renamed commonProperties to commonSdkLibraryProperties to
disambiguate it from the ModuleBase.commonProperties field.
4) Extracts requiresRuntimeImplementationLibrary() to remove duplicate
code accessing the Api_only property.
5) Tests for the api_only and shared_library behaviours.
Test: m nothing - added tests, tests broke, fixed code, tests passed.
Bug: 156723295
Merged-In: Iccf509e808d5ff53522188541a4c54d8f9ada93c
Change-Id: Iccf509e808d5ff53522188541a4c54d8f9ada93c
(cherry picked from commit dfa131e673)
The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are
referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that
includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate
<uses-library> entry in their manifest.
Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that:
1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module
itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs
module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it
possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be
available at runtime.
2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library
was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow
java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should
be treated as an Android shared library.
3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances
which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set
api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the
actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change.
Changes:
* Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into
java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides
the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an
SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any
references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to
the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked.
* Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented
SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the
OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the
sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return
nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked.
* Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is
a better place for it to be.
* Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize
the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating
module.
* Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the
java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be
tracked too.
* Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both
java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly.
Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock
being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken
anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest.
m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the
code.
Bug: 156723295
Merged-In: Ia99def91e9b74d2ed0a777de04b476c00ea0393d
Change-Id: Ia99def91e9b74d2ed0a777de04b476c00ea0393d
(cherry picked from commit 859fe961b0)
The stubs header jar is optimized for use as a dependency for others
to use. It only changes if there is a significant difference in the
externals of the classes, i.e. anything that a library being compiled
against depends upon. So changes to implementations of method or the
addition/removal of private methods, fields will have no impact.
As there is no benefit in returning the implementation of the stubs
jar this change removes it. The implementation is still used when
taking a snapshot as the header jar is an internal build artefact
that is not suitable for long term snapshot.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m droid
Merged-In: If91b4d106683f23788547c537228c58be2867174
Change-Id: If91b4d106683f23788547c537228c58be2867174
(cherry picked from commit 23970f4285)
Previously, in order to access say the public stubs source jar it was
necessary to directly reference the module by name. This change adds
support for accessing them indirectly via tags.
Test: nothing
Bug: 155164730
Merged-In: Id6d76e56c7b46944b2d2a44a2163fb05a5b03de9
Change-Id: Id6d76e56c7b46944b2d2a44a2163fb05a5b03de9
(cherry picked from commit 46dc45aba9)
The scopePaths struct is used by both java_sdk_library and its prebuilt
but was not populated in the same way. This change addresses those
discrepancies in preparation for a follow up change which will allow
access to some of those fields through OutputFileProvider.
Changes:
* Document the scopePaths field and struct.
* Switch those fields that may not be fully populated from Paths to
OptionalPath to make that 100% clear and protect against unchecked
use.
* Switch java_sdk_library_import to use the dependency extraction
mechanism driven by the dependency tag. This should actually have
been part of the change that added that mechanism.
* Only create prebuilt_stubs_sources if sources have been provided.
* Add dependencies from java_sdk_library_import on its stubs source
child modules if sources have been provided. That will ensure the
stubsSrcJar field is updated.
* Updates current/removedApiFilePath if provided for the scope in
java_sdk_library_import.
* Extracts ApiStubsSrcProvider from ApiStubsProvider to allow it to
be implemented by PrebuiltStubsSources so that it can provide access
to the stubs src jar that it creates.
Test: m nothing
Bug: 148080325
Bug: 155164730
Merged-In: Ic5bf884b2b1e79841843e7c3b4642796ecd49f5d
Change-Id: Ic5bf884b2b1e79841843e7c3b4642796ecd49f5d
(cherry picked from commit 0f8faffdc0)
Jiyong Park