Merge "Testing to see if waiting for transition to end will fix flaky tests" into sc-v2-dev
This commit is contained in:
commit
58763e47d6
|
@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ public class StateManager<STATE_TYPE extends BaseState<STATE_TYPE>> {
|
|||
+ ", mCurrentStableState:" + mCurrentStableState
|
||||
+ ", mState:" + mState
|
||||
+ ", mRestState:" + mRestState
|
||||
+ ", isInTransition:" + (mConfig.currentAnimation != null) + ")";
|
||||
+ ", isInTransition:" + isInTransition() + ")";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void dump(String prefix, PrintWriter writer) {
|
||||
|
@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ public class StateManager<STATE_TYPE extends BaseState<STATE_TYPE>> {
|
|||
writer.println(prefix + "\tmCurrentStableState:" + mCurrentStableState);
|
||||
writer.println(prefix + "\tmState:" + mState);
|
||||
writer.println(prefix + "\tmRestState:" + mRestState);
|
||||
writer.println(prefix + "\tisInTransition:" + (mConfig.currentAnimation != null));
|
||||
writer.println(prefix + "\tisInTransition:" + isInTransition());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public StateHandler[] getStateHandlers() {
|
||||
|
@ -129,6 +129,13 @@ public class StateManager<STATE_TYPE extends BaseState<STATE_TYPE>> {
|
|||
&& (mConfig.targetState == null || mConfig.targetState == state);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @return {@code true} If there is an active transition.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public boolean isInTransition() {
|
||||
return mConfig.currentAnimation != null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @see #goToState(STATE_TYPE, boolean, AnimatorListener)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -354,9 +354,10 @@ public abstract class AbstractLauncherUiTest {
|
|||
|
||||
// Cannot be used in TaplTests between a Tapl call injecting a gesture and a tapl call
|
||||
// expecting the results of that gesture because the wait can hide flakeness.
|
||||
protected void waitForStableState(String message, Supplier<LauncherState> state) {
|
||||
protected void waitForStateTransitionToEnd(String message, Supplier<LauncherState> state) {
|
||||
waitForLauncherCondition(message,
|
||||
launcher -> launcher.getStateManager().isInStableState(state.get()));
|
||||
launcher -> launcher.getStateManager().isInStableState(state.get())
|
||||
&& !launcher.getStateManager().isInTransition());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
protected void waitForResumed(String message) {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -91,9 +91,11 @@ public class WorkProfileTest extends AbstractLauncherUiTest {
|
|||
public void workTabExists() {
|
||||
mDevice.pressHome();
|
||||
waitForLauncherCondition("Launcher didn't start", Objects::nonNull);
|
||||
waitForStableState("Launcher internal state didn't switch to Normal", () -> NORMAL);
|
||||
waitForStateTransitionToEnd("Launcher internal state didn't switch to Normal",
|
||||
() -> NORMAL);
|
||||
executeOnLauncher(launcher -> launcher.getStateManager().goToState(ALL_APPS));
|
||||
waitForStableState("Launcher internal state didn't switch to All Apps", () -> ALL_APPS);
|
||||
waitForStateTransitionToEnd("Launcher internal state didn't switch to All Apps",
|
||||
() -> ALL_APPS);
|
||||
waitForLauncherCondition("Personal tab is missing",
|
||||
launcher -> launcher.getAppsView().isPersonalTabVisible(),
|
||||
LauncherInstrumentation.WAIT_TIME_MS);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue