debuggerd seccomp: explain why we define PROT_READ/WRITE.
Add a comment explaining why we define PROT_READ/PROT_WRITE, even though a current libminijail supports both cosntants. Bug: http://b/73273658 Test: treehugger Change-Id: I51c1be1b1b569e94dbc9045a90bc28221b7dc9c7
This commit is contained in:
parent
40ecb9abf2
commit
edd28f6ede
|
@ -33,9 +33,15 @@ rt_sigaction: 1
|
|||
rt_tgsigqueueinfo: 1
|
||||
|
||||
#define PR_SET_VMA 0x53564d41
|
||||
prctl: arg0 == PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS || arg0 == PR_SET_VMA
|
||||
|
||||
#if 0
|
||||
libminijail on vendor partitions older than P does not have constants from <sys/mman.h>.
|
||||
Define the values of PROT_READ and PROT_WRITE ourselves to maintain backwards compatibility.
|
||||
#else
|
||||
#define PROT_READ 0x1
|
||||
#define PROT_WRITE 0x2
|
||||
prctl: arg0 == PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS || arg0 == PR_SET_VMA
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
madvise: 1
|
||||
mprotect: arg2 in PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue