adbd: lessen security constraints when the device is unlocked
ALLOW_ADBD_ROOT ('adb root') and ALLOW_ADBD_NO_AUTH (ro.adb.secure = 0) are false in user build. This prevents a non-A/B device from running Treble VTS because it requires 'adb root'. Without ALLOW_ADBD_NO_AUTH, adb still can work if ro.adb.secure = 1. However, allowing it to be 0 is better for test automation. The image combination in VTS is: - system.img (userdebug): provided by Googlg - boot.img (user): provided by the OEM <-- adbd is here - vendor.img (user): provided by the OEM This change allows 'adb root' and 'ro.adb.secure = 0' when the device is unlocked in user build. No changes for userdebug/eng builds. Note that the device must be unlocked when running VTS. Otherwise, verified boot will prevent it from booting the system.img provided by Google (no verity metadata). Bug: 63313955 Bug: 63381692 Test: use the above image combination, check 'adb root' and 'ro.adb.secure = 0' can work Change-Id: I109d96c950e54c4fb0ac0c98b989a20593681e52
This commit is contained in:
parent
420eabe3b3
commit
f1d3dbc32f
|
@ -350,11 +350,11 @@ LOCAL_CFLAGS := \
|
|||
-D_GNU_SOURCE \
|
||||
-Wno-deprecated-declarations \
|
||||
|
||||
LOCAL_CFLAGS += -DALLOW_ADBD_ROOT=$(if $(filter userdebug eng,$(TARGET_BUILD_VARIANT)),1,0)
|
||||
LOCAL_CFLAGS += -DALLOW_ADBD_NO_AUTH=$(if $(filter userdebug eng,$(TARGET_BUILD_VARIANT)),1,0)
|
||||
|
||||
ifneq (,$(filter userdebug eng,$(TARGET_BUILD_VARIANT)))
|
||||
LOCAL_CFLAGS += -DALLOW_ADBD_DISABLE_VERITY=1
|
||||
LOCAL_CFLAGS += -DALLOW_ADBD_ROOT=1
|
||||
endif
|
||||
|
||||
LOCAL_MODULE := adbd
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -49,17 +49,23 @@
|
|||
|
||||
static const char* root_seclabel = nullptr;
|
||||
|
||||
static inline bool is_device_unlocked() {
|
||||
return "orange" == android::base::GetProperty("ro.boot.verifiedbootstate", "");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void drop_capabilities_bounding_set_if_needed(struct minijail *j) {
|
||||
#if defined(ALLOW_ADBD_ROOT)
|
||||
if (__android_log_is_debuggable()) {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
if (ALLOW_ADBD_ROOT || is_device_unlocked()) {
|
||||
if (__android_log_is_debuggable()) {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
minijail_capbset_drop(j, CAP_TO_MASK(CAP_SETUID) | CAP_TO_MASK(CAP_SETGID));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static bool should_drop_privileges() {
|
||||
#if defined(ALLOW_ADBD_ROOT)
|
||||
// "adb root" not allowed, always drop privileges.
|
||||
if (!ALLOW_ADBD_ROOT && !is_device_unlocked()) return true;
|
||||
|
||||
// The properties that affect `adb root` and `adb unroot` are ro.secure and
|
||||
// ro.debuggable. In this context the names don't make the expected behavior
|
||||
// particularly obvious.
|
||||
|
@ -89,9 +95,6 @@ static bool should_drop_privileges() {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return drop;
|
||||
#else
|
||||
return true; // "adb root" not allowed, always drop privileges.
|
||||
#endif // ALLOW_ADBD_ROOT
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void drop_privileges(int server_port) {
|
||||
|
@ -158,7 +161,10 @@ int adbd_main(int server_port) {
|
|||
// descriptor will always be open.
|
||||
adbd_cloexec_auth_socket();
|
||||
|
||||
if (ALLOW_ADBD_NO_AUTH && !android::base::GetBoolProperty("ro.adb.secure", false)) {
|
||||
// Respect ro.adb.secure in userdebug/eng builds (ALLOW_ADBD_NO_AUTH), or when the
|
||||
// device is unlocked.
|
||||
if ((ALLOW_ADBD_NO_AUTH || is_device_unlocked()) &&
|
||||
!android::base::GetBoolProperty("ro.adb.secure", false)) {
|
||||
auth_required = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue