There was an issue causing the fat size to shrink too small, causing
a fsck check to fail.
Bug: 17949028
Bug: 17761281
Change-Id: Id0207f2ab44e57ff81f5a53494b45344822a6495
Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>
This follows the recommendations of the SD-card association.
Change-Id: Ie89a5972d086b3df9d92e631c394a521f807b016
Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>
- Deal with some signedness issues
- Deal with some size issues
- Deal with NULL pointer issues
- Deal with some -Wunused issues
Change-Id: I1479dd90d690084491bae3475f2c547833519a57
This cleans up most of the size-related problems in system/core.
There are still a few changes needed for a clean 64-bit build,
but they look like they might require changes to things like the
fastboot protocol.
Change-Id: I1560425a289fa158e13e2e3173cc3e71976f92c0
Some versions of windows cannot handle FAT32 filesystems with less
than 65527 clusters, so make sure we don't create such beasts.
Change-Id: Id00fb02c4f8476f7dcc0ef137bd9e4975d740591
Johan Redestig