adbd's file sync service doesn't handle a full socket gracefully,
immediately terminating the service as soon as it fails to write a
response. This would generally be fine if the socket's buffer were as
large as it claims (212992 by default with a 64-bit kernel), but this
buffer size is a giant lie, as each write has 576 bytes of overhead
that's used up in the send buffer. When setting the send buffer size,
the kernel helpfully doubles the value to attempt to account for the
overhead, but when writing 8 byte responses, only 2% of the buffer
actually gets used for responses, so we run out of buffer after 364
files instead of the 26624 that would be expected.
Fix this by processing the responses as they become available, and
calculate a maximum limit to how many sends we dispatch before we stop
and wait for responses to come in.
Bug: http://b/150827486
Test: manually modified adbd to respond with giant error messages, and
modified adb to not read responses until we choose to block
Change-Id: Ieb8c935662864211e2fd16c337ffed0992990086
(cherry picked from commit 672cdfeeff)
Make it so that we can get the sizeof a member of syncmsg without having
an instance of syncmsg or doing something awful along the lines of
sizeof(reinterpret_cast<syncmsg*>(nullptr)->status).
Bug: http://b/150827486
Test: m adb adbd
Change-Id: I4830e7f90033c7706ff52cdd8d13e9cf40c73628
(cherry picked from commit eddae92928)
The marked library(ies) were available to the adbd APEX via the
hand-written whitelist in build/soong/apex/apex.go. Trying to remove the
whitelist by adding apex_available property to the Android.bp of the
libraries.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: already +2'ed by the owner (enh)
Bug: 150999716
Bug: 151398197
Test: m
Change-Id: I8b572e3c4e76bd10c0443a6c08b72e9519243ab5
adbd's file sync service doesn't handle a full socket gracefully,
immediately terminating the service as soon as it fails to write a
response. This would generally be fine if the socket's buffer were as
large as it claims (212992 by default with a 64-bit kernel), but this
buffer size is a giant lie, as each write has 576 bytes of overhead
that's used up in the send buffer. When setting the send buffer size,
the kernel helpfully doubles the value to attempt to account for the
overhead, but when writing 8 byte responses, only 2% of the buffer
actually gets used for responses, so we run out of buffer after 364
files instead of the 26624 that would be expected.
Fix this by processing the responses as they become available, and
calculate a maximum limit to how many sends we dispatch before we stop
and wait for responses to come in.
Test: manually modified adbd to respond with giant error messages, and
modified adb to not read responses until we choose to block
Change-Id: Ieb8c935662864211e2fd16c337ffed0992990086
Print not more often than once a 100ms - it is smooth enough
and speeds up transfer even more on Windows, where a single
line output may take up to 5ms.
An added benefit is getting rid of some extra heap allocation
and string formatting when in the end the identical message
filtering would've dropped the line anyway. This is also
significantly more expensive on Windows.
Bug: 151900478
Test: manual, push/pull a file and a directory
Change-Id: I9038729e8a01d5f93fd301beaeb8a086f5039b77
Make it so that we can get the sizeof a member of syncmsg without having
an instance of syncmsg or doing something awful along the lines of
sizeof(reinterpret_cast<syncmsg*>(nullptr)->status).
Test: m adb adbd
Change-Id: I4830e7f90033c7706ff52cdd8d13e9cf40c73628
Windows console IO is terribly slow. Reducing the number of
printed progress messages speeds up the transfer rate
from 80 to 130 MB/s on Windows laptop
Bug: 151900478
Test: adb push/pull
Change-Id: I223284c8a662bd8f2b8ba280cdcc8c930d3e5205
- Use one fewer heap allocation per fdevent object
- Lazy-init the fdevent context
Bug: 151239696
Test: various adb commands on Win/Linux
Change-Id: Ic7de207b30495e618f187e097c0276ad42c34005
Use only the syscalls that work with the wrapped ADB fds, or
extract the native handles for the case when need to call one
not wrapped.
Bug: 151239696
Test: adb install --incremental <apk> on Windows
Change-Id: Ia6de620171ab696b8136dcb60a2b63af6f86419f
abb links against libadbd_core for the shell protocol, and must be
on the system image because it links against cmd, so let's just
expose it to abb for now.
Bug: http://b/151398197
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: Id926bc4324d3259def21ea19d3bd72320311a6e3
servingComplete_ was left uninitialized and only set to 'true'
in the code. We initialize it to the 'false' state to avoid
uninitialized references in SkipToRequest().
Bug: 150865433
Test: TreeHugger
Change-Id: Ia8a4d7135c432eb657543c5498fc9dbe8f4718b6
Before this change, "Success" is returned after all data is streamed,
around 7.5 seconds for Megacity.
After this change, "Success" is returned in about 1.5 seconds, before
streaming finishes.
BUG: 151676293
Test: manual
Change-Id: Ifda7de48da8e82623c99ae0194f70cb162fd72fa
Currently the server often quits before installation finishes. As a
result, there is no difference in the commandline output between a
successful installation and a failed one.
Let adb client wait till installation fails or succeeds by parsing the
output from the inc-server process.
Test: $ adb install --incremental ~/Downloads/base.apk
Test: Performing Incremental Install
Test: Serving...
Test: All files should be loaded. Notifying the device.
Test: Failure [INSTALL_PARSE_FAILED_NOT_APK: Failed to parse /data/app/vmdl749343150.tmp/base.apk: Failed to load asset path /data/app/vmdl749343150.tmp/base.apk]
Test: Install command complete (ms: 91 total, 0 apk prep, 91 install)
BUG: b/150865433
Change-Id: Ie33505f9cc08fc6d60ad4a5d709526e7aa9a0ad1
We were ending up with multiple copies of the proto runtime in the
recovery image, when we need zero.
Before:
784K recovery/root/system/lib64/libadbd_services.so
832K recovery/root/system/lib64/libadbd.so
After:
360K recovery/root/system/lib64/libadbd_services.so
344K recovery/root/system/lib64/libadbd.so
Bug: http://b/150317254
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: I39fbb3959128994f0de2ae0ea47dbc0800c516fe
To be submitted along with changes in apksigner tool and the framework.
Merged to AOSP after that.
Test: adb install --incremental <apk>
go/apk-v4-signature-format
Bug: b/151241461
Change-Id: I26e187f8e389e31e2759037057b96fc6c9cb1e94
libselinux is currently being copied to APEXes. This is risky because
the library is not designed to be portable; part of it is tied to the
specific version of the Android that it was developed for.
This change fixes the problem by declaring that the library supports
a stub with the list of C APIs that are included in the stub. Then there
is only one copy of libselinux in /system/lib and other APEXes use the
copy by dynamically linking to it.
Also, adbd no longer statically links to it, because doing so brings
libselinux in it.
Bug: 151053366
Test: m com.android.adbd. It doesn't include libselinux in it.
Test: m com.android.adbd-deps-info. then inspect
out/soong/com.android.adbd-deps-info.txt. The dependency to libselinux
is shown as '(external)'.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from AOSP
Merged-In: If418cbe3abdeacb759d59052e6dca4c2067678dd
(cherry picked from commit 3ffdad0cb5)
Change-Id: If418cbe3abdeacb759d59052e6dca4c2067678dd
libselinux is currently being copied to APEXes. This is risky because
the library is not designed to be portable; part of it is tied to the
specific version of the Android that it was developed for.
This change fixes the problem by declaring that the library supports
a stub with the list of C APIs that are included in the stub. Then there
is only one copy of libselinux in /system/lib and other APEXes use the
copy by dynamically linking to it.
Also, adbd no longer statically links to it, because doing so brings
libselinux in it.
Bug: 151053366
Test: m com.android.adbd. It doesn't include libselinux in it.
Test: m com.android.adbd-deps-info. then inspect
out/soong/com.android.adbd-deps-info.txt. The dependency to libselinux
is shown as '(external)'.
Change-Id: If418cbe3abdeacb759d59052e6dca4c2067678dd
Yurii Zubrytskyi