Even though mdnsresponder seems to allow us to use _adb_secure_connect
and _adb_secure_pairing as service names, these names violate the syntax
outlined in RFC6763, and may not be compatible with other dns-sd
implementations.
Also address some comments from a previous CL.
Bug: 154268895
Test: atest adbd_test
Change-Id: Ia872e976fc4276587b500a827a41d46d9dc755dd
In the context of secure connect, allows adbd and host adb to reject
each other based on incompatible versions without even having to
actually connect (since it is a DNS TXT).
Bug: 111434128, 119490749
Test: N/A
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: already approved
Change-Id: I54312d8b67370c397ba81ecdbca1b27e3ee58572
This CL exposes a callback-based interface to perform some action for
each resolved pairing/connect service as a function of their hostname,
ip address, and port.
The ADB client can then use this information to either set up secure
connections directly, or to tell the adb host server to do so, or
something.
Bug: 111434128, 119490749
Test: N/A
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: already approved
Change-Id: I2dd04c322df5b0597859f44703cfd2f3f29fd737
This CL makes it so the client looks for the adb secure pairing
and adb secure connect services. Nothing else should happen,
but this should be useful to see if the right packet traffic for
discoverability is happening.
Bug: 111434128, 119490749
Test: N/A
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: already approved
Change-Id: I266bdb8526cf39bbfa131344dca2b1bb14c14a7b
Test: Was able to discover a raspberry pi.
Bug: 28074466
(cherry picked from e292cd16760321fccc99c8c261cb92fa4b6462ab)
Change-Id: Id9571576457a4a0a078e48a274a4e8eac78bfe2b
Joshua Duong