mirror of https://gitee.com/openkylin/qemu.git
target/arm: Merge arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller into sole caller
Coverity reports, in sve_zcr_get_valid_len, "Subtract operation overflows on operands arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller(cpu, start_vq + 1U) and 1U" First, the aarch32 stub version of arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller, returning 0, does exactly what Coverity reports. Remove it. Second, the aarch64 version of arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller has a set of asserts, but they don't cover the case in question. Further, there is a fair amount of extra arithmetic needed to convert from the 0-based zcr register, to the 1-base vq form, to the 0-based bitmap, and back again. This can be simplified by leaving the value in the 0-based form. Finally, use test_bit to simplify the common case, where the length in the zcr registers is in fact a supported length. Reported-by: Coverity (CID 1407217) Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Message-id: 20191118091414.19440-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
83ad95957c
commit
6e553f2a1b
|
@ -185,12 +185,9 @@ typedef struct {
|
|||
#ifdef TARGET_AARCH64
|
||||
# define ARM_MAX_VQ 16
|
||||
void arm_cpu_sve_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp);
|
||||
uint32_t arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller(ARMCPU *cpu, uint32_t vq);
|
||||
#else
|
||||
# define ARM_MAX_VQ 1
|
||||
static inline void arm_cpu_sve_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp) { }
|
||||
static inline uint32_t arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller(ARMCPU *cpu, uint32_t vq)
|
||||
{ return 0; }
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
typedef struct ARMVectorReg {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -458,21 +458,6 @@ void arm_cpu_sve_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
|
|||
cpu->sve_max_vq = max_vq;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
uint32_t arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller(ARMCPU *cpu, uint32_t vq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
uint32_t bitnum;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We allow vq == ARM_MAX_VQ + 1 to be input because the caller may want
|
||||
* to find the maximum vq enabled, which may be ARM_MAX_VQ, but this
|
||||
* function always returns the next smaller than the input.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
assert(vq && vq <= ARM_MAX_VQ + 1);
|
||||
|
||||
bitnum = find_last_bit(cpu->sve_vq_map, vq - 1);
|
||||
return bitnum == vq - 1 ? 0 : bitnum + 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void cpu_max_get_sve_max_vq(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
|
||||
void *opaque, Error **errp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -5363,9 +5363,14 @@ int sve_exception_el(CPUARMState *env, int el)
|
|||
|
||||
static uint32_t sve_zcr_get_valid_len(ARMCPU *cpu, uint32_t start_len)
|
||||
{
|
||||
uint32_t start_vq = (start_len & 0xf) + 1;
|
||||
uint32_t end_len;
|
||||
|
||||
return arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller(cpu, start_vq + 1) - 1;
|
||||
end_len = start_len &= 0xf;
|
||||
if (!test_bit(start_len, cpu->sve_vq_map)) {
|
||||
end_len = find_last_bit(cpu->sve_vq_map, start_len);
|
||||
assert(end_len < start_len);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return end_len;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue