linux-user: Fix guest_addr_valid vs reserved_va

We must always use GUEST_ADDR_MAX, because even 32-bit hosts can
use -R <reserved_va> to restrict the memory address of the guest.

Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210212184902.1251044-11-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Richard Henderson 2021-02-12 10:48:41 -08:00 committed by Peter Maydell
parent 57096f2977
commit a78a6363cb
1 changed files with 4 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -72,11 +72,10 @@ typedef uint64_t abi_ptr;
/* All direct uses of g2h and h2g need to go away for usermode softmmu. */
#define g2h(x) ((void *)((uintptr_t)(abi_ptr)(x) + guest_base))
#if HOST_LONG_BITS <= TARGET_VIRT_ADDR_SPACE_BITS
#define guest_addr_valid(x) (1)
#else
#define guest_addr_valid(x) ((x) <= GUEST_ADDR_MAX)
#endif
static inline bool guest_addr_valid(abi_ulong x)
{
return x <= GUEST_ADDR_MAX;
}
static inline bool guest_range_valid(abi_ulong start, abi_ulong len)
{