It is better to fail migration in case of failure to
allocate new cache item
Signed-off-by: Orit Wasserman <owasserm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Orit Wasserman <owasserm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Some source files #include the same header more than
once for no good reason. Remove second #includes in
such cases.
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
The page cache frees all data on finish, on resize and
if there is collision on insert. So it should be the caches
responsibility to dup the data that is stored in the cache.
Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
Signed-off-by: Orit Wasserman <owasserm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
XBZRLE encoded migration introduced a MRU page cache
meachnism. Unfortunately, cached items where never freed in
case of a collision in the page cache on cache_insert().
This lead to out of memory conditions during XBZRLE migration
if the page cache was small and there where a lot of collisions
in the cache.
Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
Signed-off-by: Orit Wasserman <owasserm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Instead of using cache_insert do the update itself
Signed-off-by: Orit Wasserman <owasserm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Orit Wasserman