Commit Graph

15 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Markus Armbruster 40c2281cc3 Drop more @errp parameters after previous commit
Several functions can't fail anymore: ich9_pm_add_properties(),
device_add_bootindex_property(), ppc_compat_add_property(),
spapr_caps_add_properties(), PropertyInfo.create().  Drop their @errp
parameter.

Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200505152926.18877-16-armbru@redhat.com>
2020-05-15 07:08:14 +02:00
Markus Armbruster d2623129a7 qom: Drop parameter @errp of object_property_add() & friends
The only way object_property_add() can fail is when a property with
the same name already exists.  Since our property names are all
hardcoded, failure is a programming error, and the appropriate way to
handle it is passing &error_abort.

Same for its variants, except for object_property_add_child(), which
additionally fails when the child already has a parent.  Parentage is
also under program control, so this is a programming error, too.

We have a bit over 500 callers.  Almost half of them pass
&error_abort, slightly fewer ignore errors, one test case handles
errors, and the remaining few callers pass them to their own callers.

The previous few commits demonstrated once again that ignoring
programming errors is a bad idea.

Of the few ones that pass on errors, several violate the Error API.
The Error ** argument must be NULL, &error_abort, &error_fatal, or a
pointer to a variable containing NULL.  Passing an argument of the
latter kind twice without clearing it in between is wrong: if the
first call sets an error, it no longer points to NULL for the second
call.  ich9_pm_add_properties(), sparc32_ledma_realize(),
sparc32_dma_realize(), xilinx_axidma_realize(), xilinx_enet_realize()
are wrong that way.

When the one appropriate choice of argument is &error_abort, letting
users pick the argument is a bad idea.

Drop parameter @errp and assert the preconditions instead.

There's one exception to "duplicate property name is a programming
error": the way object_property_add() implements the magic (and
undocumented) "automatic arrayification".  Don't drop @errp there.
Instead, rename object_property_add() to object_property_try_add(),
and add the obvious wrapper object_property_add().

Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200505152926.18877-15-armbru@redhat.com>
[Two semantic rebase conflicts resolved]
2020-05-15 07:07:58 +02:00
Markus Armbruster 7eecec7d12 qom: Drop object_property_set_description() parameter @errp
object_property_set_description() and
object_class_property_set_description() fail only when property @name
is not found.

There are 85 calls of object_property_set_description() and
object_class_property_set_description().  None of them can fail:

* 84 immediately follow the creation of the property.

* The one in spapr_rng_instance_init() refers to a property created in
  spapr_rng_class_init(), from spapr_rng_properties[].

Every one of them still gets to decide what to pass for @errp.

51 calls pass &error_abort, 32 calls pass NULL, one receives the error
and propagates it to &error_abort, and one propagates it to
&error_fatal.  I'm actually surprised none of them violates the Error
API.

What are we gaining by letting callers handle the "property not found"
error?  Use when the property is not known to exist is simpler: you
don't have to guard the call with a check.  We haven't found such a
use in 5+ years.  Until we do, let's make life a bit simpler and drop
the @errp parameter.

Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200505152926.18877-8-armbru@redhat.com>
[One semantic rebase conflict resolved]
2020-05-15 07:06:49 +02:00
Cédric Le Goater 7d37b274ff target/ppc: Add POWER10 DD1.0 model information
This includes in QEMU a new CPU model for the POWER10 processor with
the same capabilities of a POWER9 process. The model will be extended
when support is completed.

Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20191205184454.10722-2-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
2019-12-17 10:39:48 +11:00
David Gibson ad99d04c76 target/ppc: Allow cpu compatiblity checks based on type, not instance
ppc_check_compat() is used in a number of places to check if a cpu object
supports a certain compatiblity mode, subject to various constraints.

It takes a PowerPCCPU *, however it really only depends on the cpu's class.
We have upcoming cases where it would be useful to make compatibility
checks before we fully instantiate the cpu objects.

ppc_type_check_compat() will now make an equivalent check, but based on a
CPU's QOM typename instead of an instantiated CPU object.

We make use of the new interface in several places in spapr, where we're
essentially making a global check, rather than one specific to a particular
cpu.  This avoids some ugly uses of first_cpu to grab a "representative"
instance.

Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2018-06-21 21:22:53 +10:00
David Gibson abbc124753 target/ppc: Clarify compat mode max_threads value
We recently had some discussions that were sidetracked for a while, because
nearly everyone misapprehended the purpose of the 'max_threads' field in
the compatiblity modes table.  It's all about guest expectations, not host
expectations or support (that's handled elsewhere).

In an attempt to avoid a repeat of that confusion, rename the field to
'max_vthreads' and add an explanatory comment.

Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Jose Ricardo Ziviani <joserz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-01-17 09:35:24 +11:00
Jose Ricardo Ziviani 03ee51d354 ppc: Change Power9 compat table to support at most 8 threads/core
Increases the max smt mode to 8 for Power9. That's because KVM supports
smt emulation in this platform so QEMU should allow users to use it as
well.

Today if we try to pass -smp ...,threads=8, QEMU will silently truncate
it to smt4 mode and may cause a crash if we try to perform a cpu
hotplug.

Signed-off-by: Jose Ricardo Ziviani <joserz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[dwg: Added an explanatory comment]
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
2018-01-17 09:35:24 +11:00
Greg Kurz e4f0c6bb1a ppc: fix setting of compat mode
While trying to make KVM PR usable again, commit 5dfaa532ae introduced a
regression: the current compat_pvr value is passed to KVM instead of the
new one. This means that we always pass 0 instead of the max-cpu-compat
PVR during the initial machine reset. And at CAS time, we either pass
the PVR from the command line or even don't call kvmppc_set_compat() at
all, ie, the PCR will not be set as expected.

For example if we start a big endian fedora26 guest in power7 compat
mode on a POWER8 host, we get this in the guest:

$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor       : 0
cpu             : POWER7 (architected), altivec supported
clock           : 4024.000000MHz
revision        : 2.0 (pvr 004d 0200)

timebase        : 512000000
platform        : pSeries
model           : IBM pSeries (emulated by qemu)
machine         : CHRP IBM pSeries (emulated by qemu)
MMU             : Hash

but the guest can still execute POWER8 instructions, and the following
program succeeds:

int main()
{
        asm("vncipher 0,0,0"); // ISA 2.07 instruction
}

Let's pass the new compat_pvr to kvmppc_set_compat() and the program fails
with SIGILL as expected.

Reported-by: Nageswara R Sastry <rnsastry@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
2017-11-08 13:21:37 +11:00
Greg Kurz 5dfaa532e0 ppc: fix ppc_set_compat() with KVM PR
When running in KVM PR mode, kvmppc_set_compat() always fail because the
current PR implementation doesn't handle KVM_REG_PPC_ARCH_COMPAT. Now that
the machine code inconditionally calls ppc_set_compat_all() at reset time
to restore the compat mode default value (commit 66d5c492dd), it is
impossible to start a guest with PR:

qemu-system-ppc64: Unable to set CPU compatibility mode in KVM:
 Invalid argument

A tentative patch [1] was recently sent by Suraj to address the issue, but
it would prevent the compat mode to be turned off on reset. And we really
don't want to explicitely check for KVM PR. During the patch's review,
David suggested that we should only call the KVM ioctl() if the compat
PVR changes. This allows at least to run with KVM PR, provided no compat
mode is requested from the command line (which should be the case when
running PR nested). This is what this patch does.

While here, we also fix the side effect where KVM would fail but we would
change the CPU state in QEMU anyway.

[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/782039/

Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
2017-08-22 21:26:46 +10:00
David Gibson 7843c0d60d pseries: Move CPU compatibility property to machine
Server class POWER CPUs have a "compat" property, which is used to set the
backwards compatibility mode for the processor.  However, this only makes
sense for machine types which don't give the guest access to hypervisor
privilege - otherwise the compatibility level is under the guest's control.

To reflect this, this removes the CPU 'compat' property and instead
creates a 'max-cpu-compat' property on the pseries machine.  Strictly
speaking this breaks compatibility, but AFAIK the 'compat' option was
never (directly) used with -device or device_add.

The option was used with -cpu.  So, to maintain compatibility, this
patch adds a hack to the cpu option parsing to strip out any compat
options supplied with -cpu and set them on the machine property
instead of the now deprecated cpu property.

Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Tested-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Tested-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Tested-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
2017-06-30 14:03:31 +10:00
Suraj Jitindar Singh 9b44c836dc target/ppc: Add POWER9/ISAv3.00 to compat_table
compat_table contains the list of logical pvr compat modes which a cpu can
operate in. It is a list of struct CompatInfo which contains the given pvr
value for a compat mode, the pcr bits which should be set to operate in
that compat mode, the pcr level which must be present in pcr_supported for
a processor to support that compat mode and the max threads possible in
that compat mode.

Add an entry for the POWER9/ISAv3.00 logical pvr which represents a
processor running with support for logical pvr 0x0f000005. A processor
running in this mode should have PCR_COMPAT_3_00 set in the pcr (if
available in pcr_mask) and should have PCR_COMPAT_3_00 in pcr_supported
to indicate that it is capable of running in this compat mode.

Also add PCR_COMPAT_3_00 to the bits which must be set for all previous
compat modes. Since no processor models contain this bit yet in pcr_mask
it will never be set, but this ensures we don't forget to in the future.

Signed-off-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
2017-03-03 11:30:59 +11:00
David Gibson f6f242c757 ppc: Add ppc_set_compat_all()
Once a compatiblity mode is negotiated with the guest,
h_client_architecture_support() uses run_on_cpu() to update each CPU to
the new mode.  We're going to want this logic somewhere else shortly,
so make a helper function to do this global update.

We put it in target-ppc/compat.c - it makes as much sense at the CPU level
as it does at the machine level.  We also move the cpu_synchronize_state()
into ppc_set_compat(), since it doesn't really make any sense to call that
without synchronizing state.

Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
2017-01-31 10:10:14 +11:00
David Gibson 9d2179d6f9 ppc: Validate compatibility modes when setting
Current ppc_set_compat() will attempt to set any compatiblity mode
specified, regardless of whether it's available on the CPU.  The caller is
expected to make sure it is setting a possible mode, which is awkwward
because most of the information to make that decision is at the CPU level.

This begins to clean this up by introducing a ppc_check_compat() function
which will determine if a given compatiblity mode is supported on a CPU
(and also whether it lies within specified minimum and maximum compat
levels, which will be useful later).  It also contains an assertion that
the CPU has a "virtual hypervisor"[1], that is, that the guest isn't
permitted to execute hypervisor privilege code.  Without that, the guest
would own the PCR and so could override any mode set here.  Only machine
types which use a virtual hypervisor (i.e. 'pseries') should use
ppc_check_compat().

ppc_set_compat() is modified to validate the compatibility mode it is given
and fail if it's not available on this CPU.

[1] Or user-only mode, which also obviously doesn't allow access to the
hypervisor privileged PCR.  We don't use that now, but could in future.

Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
2017-01-31 10:10:13 +11:00
David Gibson 12dbeb16d0 ppc: Rewrite ppc_get_compat_smt_threads()
To continue consolidation of compatibility mode information, this rewrites
the ppc_get_compat_smt_threads() function using the table of compatiblity
modes in target-ppc/compat.c.

It's not a direct replacement, the new ppc_compat_max_threads() function
has simpler semantics - it just returns the number of threads the cpu
model has, taking into account any compatiblity mode it is in.

This no longer takes into account kvmppc_smt_threads() as the previous
version did.  That check wasn't useful because we check in
ppc_cpu_realizefn() that CPUs aren't instantiated with more threads
than kvm allows (or if we didn't things will already be broken and
this won't make it any worse).

Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
2017-01-31 10:10:13 +11:00
David Gibson 9d6f106552 ppc: Rewrite ppc_set_compat()
This rewrites the ppc_set_compat() function so that instead of open coding
the various compatibility modes, it reads the relevant data from a table.
This is a first step in consolidating the information on compatibility
modes scattered across the code into a single place.

It also makes one change to the logic.  The old code masked the bits
to be set in the PCR (Processor Compatibility Register) by which bits
are valid on the host CPU.  This made no sense, since it was done
regardless of whether our guest CPU was the same as the host CPU or
not.  Furthermore, the actual PCR bits are only relevant for TCG[1] -
KVM instead uses the compatibility mode we tell it in
kvmppc_set_compat().  When using TCG host cpu information usually
isn't even present.

While we're at it, we put the new implementation in a new file to make the
enormous translate_init.c a little smaller.

[1] Actually it doesn't even do anything in TCG, but it will if / when we
    get to implementing compatibility mode logic at that level.

Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
2017-01-31 10:10:13 +11:00