virt-manager: add new checkbox to control CPU security features
By default we copy CPU security features to the guest if specific CPU model is selected. However, this may break migration and will affect performance of the guest. This adds an option to disable this default behavior. The checkbox is clickable only on x86 and only on host where we can detect any CPU security features, otherwise a tooltip is set to notify users that there is nothing to copy. Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
00f8dea370
commit
8720637cff
|
@ -2122,6 +2122,21 @@
|
|||
<property name="top_attach">1</property>
|
||||
</packing>
|
||||
</child>
|
||||
<child>
|
||||
<object class="GtkCheckButton" id="cpu-secure">
|
||||
<property name="label" translatable="yes">Enable available CPU security flaw mitigations</property>
|
||||
<property name="visible">True</property>
|
||||
<property name="can_focus">True</property>
|
||||
<property name="receives_default">False</property>
|
||||
<property name="draw_indicator">True</property>
|
||||
<signal name="toggled" handler="on_cpu_secure_toggled" swapped="no"/>
|
||||
</object>
|
||||
<packing>
|
||||
<property name="left_attach">0</property>
|
||||
<property name="top_attach">2</property>
|
||||
<property name="width">2</property>
|
||||
</packing>
|
||||
</child>
|
||||
</object>
|
||||
</child>
|
||||
</object>
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -537,6 +537,7 @@ class vmmDetails(vmmGObjectUI):
|
|||
"on_cpu_maxvcpus_changed": self.config_maxvcpus_changed,
|
||||
"on_cpu_model_changed": lambda *x: self.config_cpu_model_changed(x),
|
||||
"on_cpu_copy_host_clicked": self.on_cpu_copy_host_clicked,
|
||||
"on_cpu_secure_toggled": self.on_cpu_secure_toggled,
|
||||
"on_cpu_cores_changed": self.config_cpu_topology_changed,
|
||||
"on_cpu_sockets_changed": self.config_cpu_topology_changed,
|
||||
"on_cpu_threads_changed": self.config_cpu_topology_changed,
|
||||
|
@ -1732,6 +1733,11 @@ class vmmDetails(vmmGObjectUI):
|
|||
def on_cpu_copy_host_clicked(self, src):
|
||||
uiutil.set_grid_row_visible(
|
||||
self.widget("cpu-model"), not src.get_active())
|
||||
uiutil.set_grid_row_visible(
|
||||
self.widget("cpu-secure"), not src.get_active())
|
||||
self.enable_apply(EDIT_CPU)
|
||||
|
||||
def on_cpu_secure_toggled(self, ignore):
|
||||
self.enable_apply(EDIT_CPU)
|
||||
|
||||
def config_cpu_model_changed(self, ignore):
|
||||
|
@ -2032,6 +2038,7 @@ class vmmDetails(vmmGObjectUI):
|
|||
|
||||
if self.edited(EDIT_CPU):
|
||||
kwargs["model"] = self.get_config_cpu_model()
|
||||
kwargs["secure"] = self.widget("cpu-secure").get_active()
|
||||
|
||||
if self.edited(EDIT_TOPOLOGY):
|
||||
do_top = self.widget("cpu-topology-enable").get_active()
|
||||
|
@ -2605,6 +2612,11 @@ class vmmDetails(vmmGObjectUI):
|
|||
n1, n2 = self.vm.network_traffic_vectors()
|
||||
self.network_traffic_graph.set_property("data_array", n1 + n2)
|
||||
|
||||
def _cpu_secure_is_available(self):
|
||||
domcaps = self.vm.get_domain_capabilities()
|
||||
features = domcaps.get_cpu_security_features()
|
||||
return self.vm.get_xmlobj().os.is_x86() and len(features) > 0
|
||||
|
||||
def refresh_config_cpu(self):
|
||||
# Set topology first, because it impacts maxvcpus values
|
||||
cpu = self.vm.get_cpu_config()
|
||||
|
@ -2658,6 +2670,15 @@ class vmmDetails(vmmGObjectUI):
|
|||
self.widget("cpu-copy-host").set_active(bool(is_host))
|
||||
self.on_cpu_copy_host_clicked(self.widget("cpu-copy-host"))
|
||||
|
||||
if not self._cpu_secure_is_available():
|
||||
self.widget("cpu-secure").set_sensitive(False)
|
||||
self.widget("cpu-secure").set_tooltip_text(
|
||||
"No security features to copy, the host is missing "
|
||||
"security patches or the host CPU is not vulnerable.")
|
||||
|
||||
cpu.check_security_features(self.vm.get_xmlobj())
|
||||
self.widget("cpu-secure").set_active(cpu.secure)
|
||||
|
||||
def refresh_config_memory(self):
|
||||
host_mem_widget = self.widget("state-host-memory")
|
||||
host_mem = self.vm.conn.host_memory_size() // 1024
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ class vmmDomain(vmmLibvirtObject):
|
|||
self._redefine_xmlobj(xmlobj)
|
||||
|
||||
def define_cpu(self, vcpus=_SENTINEL, maxvcpus=_SENTINEL,
|
||||
model=_SENTINEL, sockets=_SENTINEL,
|
||||
model=_SENTINEL, secure=_SENTINEL, sockets=_SENTINEL,
|
||||
cores=_SENTINEL, threads=_SENTINEL):
|
||||
guest = self._make_xmlobj_to_define()
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -456,7 +456,8 @@ class vmmDomain(vmmLibvirtObject):
|
|||
guest.cpu.cores = cores
|
||||
guest.cpu.threads = threads
|
||||
|
||||
if model != _SENTINEL:
|
||||
if secure != _SENTINEL or model != _SENTINEL:
|
||||
guest.cpu.secure = secure
|
||||
if model in guest.cpu.SPECIAL_MODES:
|
||||
guest.cpu.set_special_mode(guest, model)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -122,6 +122,36 @@ class DomainCpu(XMLBuilder):
|
|||
if not exists:
|
||||
self.add_feature(feature)
|
||||
|
||||
def check_security_features(self, guest):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Since 'secure' property is not exported into the domain XML
|
||||
we might need to refresh its state.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
domcaps = guest.lookup_domcaps()
|
||||
features = domcaps.get_cpu_security_features()
|
||||
|
||||
if len(features) == 0:
|
||||
self.secure = False
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
||||
for feature in features:
|
||||
exists = False
|
||||
for f in self.features:
|
||||
if f.name == feature and f.policy == "require":
|
||||
exists = True
|
||||
break
|
||||
if not exists:
|
||||
self.secure = False
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
||||
def _remove_security_features(self, guest):
|
||||
domcaps = guest.lookup_domcaps()
|
||||
for feature in domcaps.get_cpu_security_features():
|
||||
for f in self.features:
|
||||
if f.name == feature and f.policy == "require":
|
||||
self.remove_child(f)
|
||||
break
|
||||
|
||||
def set_model(self, guest, val):
|
||||
logging.debug("setting cpu model %s", val)
|
||||
if val:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue