update
This commit is contained in:
parent
f62e0004b0
commit
3bb67e9d0b
2
index.md
2
index.md
|
@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Case study of the FCA. The code can be find in [FCA]([http://]).
|
|||
|
||||
#### Different combination of loss terms
|
||||
|
||||
![](https://github.com/winterwindwang/Full-coverage-camouflage-adversarial-attack/blob/gh-pages/assets/abaltion_study_loss.png)
|
||||
![image](https://github.com/winterwindwang/Full-coverage-camouflage-adversarial-attack/blob/gh-pages/assets/abaltion_study_loss.png)
|
||||
|
||||
As we can see from the Figure, different loss term plays different role in attacking. For example, the camouflaged car generated by `obj+smooth (we omit the smooth loss, and denotes as obj)` hardly hidden from the detector, while the camouflaged car generated by `iou` successfully suppress the detecting bounding box of the car region, and finally the camouflaged car generated by `cls` successfully make the detector to misclassify the car to anther category.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue