Update README.md
This commit is contained in:
parent
59c909da94
commit
b5a116dce1
21
README.md
21
README.md
|
@ -1,4 +1,19 @@
|
||||||
# Full-coverage-camouflage-adversarial-attack
|
## FCA: Learning a 3D Full-coverage Vehicle Camouflage for Multi-view Physical Adversarial Attack
|
||||||
## code and example are public available!
|
|
||||||
### Different combination of loss terms
|
Case study of the FCA. The code can be find in [FCA]([http://]).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Cases of digital attack
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
!(image)[https://github.com/winterwindwang/Full-coverage-camouflage-adversarial-attack/blob/gh-pages/assets/distance_10_elevation_30_adv_pred.gif]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Cases of multi-view robust
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Ablation study
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### Different combination of loss terms
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
![image](https://github.com/winterwindwang/Full-coverage-camouflage-adversarial-attack/blob/gh-pages/assets/abaltion_study_loss.png)
|
![image](https://github.com/winterwindwang/Full-coverage-camouflage-adversarial-attack/blob/gh-pages/assets/abaltion_study_loss.png)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
As we can see from the Figure, different loss term plays different role in attacking. For example, the camouflaged car generated by `obj+smooth (we omit the smooth loss, and denotes as obj)` hardly hidden from the detector, while the camouflaged car generated by `iou` successfully suppress the detecting bounding box of the car region, and finally the camouflaged car generated by `cls` successfully make the detector to misclassify the car to anther category.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue