From 77e6e3dde62b091e7347b3c1c2f9bff610f9d2ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: freeneuro <923237475@qq.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2021 16:40:56 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Update README.md

---
 README.md | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 205f240..6b9ae0e 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -15,4 +15,5 @@ Case study of the FCA. The code can be find in [FCA](https://github.com/winterwi
 #### Different combination of loss terms
 
 <img src = 'https://github.com/winterwindwang/Full-coverage-camouflage-adversarial-attack/blob/gh-pages/assets/abaltion_study_loss.png?raw=true'/>
+
 As we can see from the Figure, different loss term plays different role in attacking. For example, the camouflaged car generated by `obj+smooth (we omit the smooth loss, and denotes as obj)` hardly hidden from the detector, while the camouflaged car generated by `iou` successfully suppress the detecting bounding box of the car region, and finally the camouflaged car generated by `cls` successfully make the detector to misclassify the car to anther category.