Update README.md
This commit is contained in:
parent
e68b753a27
commit
77e6e3dde6
|
@ -15,4 +15,5 @@ Case study of the FCA. The code can be find in [FCA](https://github.com/winterwi
|
||||||
#### Different combination of loss terms
|
#### Different combination of loss terms
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<img src = 'https://github.com/winterwindwang/Full-coverage-camouflage-adversarial-attack/blob/gh-pages/assets/abaltion_study_loss.png?raw=true'/>
|
<img src = 'https://github.com/winterwindwang/Full-coverage-camouflage-adversarial-attack/blob/gh-pages/assets/abaltion_study_loss.png?raw=true'/>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
As we can see from the Figure, different loss term plays different role in attacking. For example, the camouflaged car generated by `obj+smooth (we omit the smooth loss, and denotes as obj)` hardly hidden from the detector, while the camouflaged car generated by `iou` successfully suppress the detecting bounding box of the car region, and finally the camouflaged car generated by `cls` successfully make the detector to misclassify the car to anther category.
|
As we can see from the Figure, different loss term plays different role in attacking. For example, the camouflaged car generated by `obj+smooth (we omit the smooth loss, and denotes as obj)` hardly hidden from the detector, while the camouflaged car generated by `iou` successfully suppress the detecting bounding box of the car region, and finally the camouflaged car generated by `cls` successfully make the detector to misclassify the car to anther category.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue