Update README.md
This commit is contained in:
parent
8c522e2d82
commit
d53a52f359
|
@ -4,8 +4,7 @@ Case study of the FCA. The code can be find in [FCA]([http://]).
|
|||
|
||||
### Cases of digital attack
|
||||
|
||||
![image](https://github.com/winterwindwang/Full-coverage-camouflage-adversarial-attack/blob/gh-pages/assets/distance_10_elevation_30_adv_pred.gif)
|
||||
|
||||
<img src = 'https://github.com/winterwindwang/Full-coverage-camouflage-adversarial-attack/blob/gh-pages/assets/distance_10_elevation_30_adv_pred.gif?raw=true'/>
|
||||
### Cases of multi-view robust
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -14,6 +13,5 @@ Case study of the FCA. The code can be find in [FCA]([http://]).
|
|||
|
||||
#### Different combination of loss terms
|
||||
|
||||
![image](https://github.com/winterwindwang/Full-coverage-camouflage-adversarial-attack/blob/gh-pages/assets/abaltion_study_loss.png)
|
||||
|
||||
<img src = 'https://github.com/winterwindwang/Full-coverage-camouflage-adversarial-attack/blob/gh-pages/assets/abaltion_study_loss.png?raw=true'/>
|
||||
As we can see from the Figure, different loss term plays different role in attacking. For example, the camouflaged car generated by `obj+smooth (we omit the smooth loss, and denotes as obj)` hardly hidden from the detector, while the camouflaged car generated by `iou` successfully suppress the detecting bounding box of the car region, and finally the camouflaged car generated by `cls` successfully make the detector to misclassify the car to anther category.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue