linux_old1/kernel/irq/affinity.c

271 lines
6.7 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-11-01 22:07:57 +08:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/*
* Copyright (C) 2016 Thomas Gleixner.
* Copyright (C) 2016-2017 Christoph Hellwig.
*/
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
static void irq_spread_init_one(struct cpumask *irqmsk, struct cpumask *nmsk,
int cpus_per_vec)
{
const struct cpumask *siblmsk;
int cpu, sibl;
for ( ; cpus_per_vec > 0; ) {
cpu = cpumask_first(nmsk);
/* Should not happen, but I'm too lazy to think about it */
if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
return;
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, nmsk);
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, irqmsk);
cpus_per_vec--;
/* If the cpu has siblings, use them first */
siblmsk = topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu);
for (sibl = -1; cpus_per_vec > 0; ) {
sibl = cpumask_next(sibl, siblmsk);
if (sibl >= nr_cpu_ids)
break;
if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(sibl, nmsk))
continue;
cpumask_set_cpu(sibl, irqmsk);
cpus_per_vec--;
}
}
}
static cpumask_var_t *alloc_node_to_cpumask(void)
{
cpumask_var_t *masks;
int node;
masks = kcalloc(nr_node_ids, sizeof(cpumask_var_t), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!masks)
return NULL;
for (node = 0; node < nr_node_ids; node++) {
if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&masks[node], GFP_KERNEL))
goto out_unwind;
}
return masks;
out_unwind:
while (--node >= 0)
free_cpumask_var(masks[node]);
kfree(masks);
return NULL;
}
static void free_node_to_cpumask(cpumask_var_t *masks)
{
int node;
for (node = 0; node < nr_node_ids; node++)
free_cpumask_var(masks[node]);
kfree(masks);
}
static void build_node_to_cpumask(cpumask_var_t *masks)
{
int cpu;
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, masks[cpu_to_node(cpu)]);
}
static int get_nodes_in_cpumask(cpumask_var_t *node_to_cpumask,
const struct cpumask *mask, nodemask_t *nodemsk)
{
genirq/affinity: Fix node generation from cpumask Commit 34c3d9819fda ("genirq/affinity: Provide smarter irq spreading infrastructure") introduced a better IRQ spreading mechanism, taking account of the available NUMA nodes in the machine. Problem is that the algorithm of retrieving the nodemask iterates "linearly" based on the number of online nodes - some architectures present non-linear node distribution among the nodemask, like PowerPC. If this is the case, the algorithm lead to a wrong node count number and therefore to a bad/incomplete IRQ affinity distribution. For example, this problem were found in a machine with 128 CPUs and two nodes, namely nodes 0 and 8 (instead of 0 and 1, if it was linearly distributed). This led to a wrong affinity distribution which then led to a bad mq allocation for nvme driver. Finally, we take the opportunity to fix a comment regarding the affinity distribution when we have _more_ nodes than vectors. Fixes: 34c3d9819fda ("genirq/affinity: Provide smarter irq spreading infrastructure") Reported-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <gabriel@krisman.be> Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <gabriel@krisman.be> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: hch@lst.de Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1481738472-2671-1-git-send-email-gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2016-12-15 02:01:12 +08:00
int n, nodes = 0;
/* Calculate the number of nodes in the supplied affinity mask */
for_each_node(n) {
if (cpumask_intersects(mask, node_to_cpumask[n])) {
node_set(n, *nodemsk);
nodes++;
}
}
return nodes;
}
static int irq_build_affinity_masks(const struct irq_affinity *affd,
int startvec, int numvecs,
cpumask_var_t *node_to_cpumask,
const struct cpumask *cpu_mask,
struct cpumask *nmsk,
struct cpumask *masks)
{
int n, nodes, cpus_per_vec, extra_vecs, done = 0;
int last_affv = affd->pre_vectors + numvecs;
int curvec = startvec;
nodemask_t nodemsk = NODE_MASK_NONE;
genirq/affinity: Spread irq vectors among present CPUs as far as possible Commit 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs") tried to spread the interrupts accross all possible CPUs to make sure that in case of phsyical hotplug (e.g. virtualization) the CPUs which get plugged in after the device was initialized are targeted by a hardware queue and the corresponding interrupt. This has a downside in cases where the ACPI tables claim that there are more possible CPUs than present CPUs and the number of interrupts to spread out is smaller than the number of possible CPUs. These bogus ACPI tables are unfortunately not uncommon. In such a case the vector spreading algorithm assigns interrupts to CPUs which can never be utilized and as a consequence these interrupts are unused instead of being mapped to present CPUs. As a result the performance of the device is suboptimal. To fix this spread the interrupt vectors in two stages: 1) Spread as many interrupts as possible among the present CPUs 2) Spread the remaining vectors among non present CPUs On a 8 core system, where CPU 0-3 are present and CPU 4-7 are not present, for a device with 4 queues the resulting interrupt affinity is: 1) Before 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs") irq 39, cpu list 0 irq 40, cpu list 1 irq 41, cpu list 2 irq 42, cpu list 3 2) With 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs") irq 39, cpu list 0-2 irq 40, cpu list 3-4,6 irq 41, cpu list 5 irq 42, cpu list 7 3) With the refined vector spread applied: irq 39, cpu list 0,4 irq 40, cpu list 1,6 irq 41, cpu list 2,5 irq 42, cpu list 3,7 On a 8 core system, where all CPUs are present the resulting interrupt affinity for the 4 queues is: irq 39, cpu list 0,1 irq 40, cpu list 2,3 irq 41, cpu list 4,5 irq 42, cpu list 6,7 This is independent of the number of CPUs which are online at the point of initialization because in such a system the offline CPUs can be easily onlined afterwards, while in non-present CPUs need to be plugged physically or virtually which requires external interaction. The downside of this approach is that in case of physical hotplug the interrupt vector spreading might be suboptimal when CPUs 4-7 are physically plugged. Suboptimal from a NUMA point of view and due to the single target nature of interrupt affinities the later plugged CPUs might not be targeted by interrupts at all. Though, physical hotplug systems are not the common case while the broken ACPI table disease is wide spread. So it's preferred to have as many interrupts as possible utilized at the point where the device is initialized. Block multi-queue devices like NVME create a hardware queue per possible CPU, so the goal of commit 84676c1f21 to assign one interrupt vector per possible CPU is still achieved even with physical/virtual hotplug. [ tglx: Changed from online to present CPUs for the first spreading stage, renamed variables for readability sake, added comments and massaged changelog ] Reported-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180308105358.1506-5-ming.lei@redhat.com
2018-03-08 18:53:58 +08:00
if (!cpumask_weight(cpu_mask))
return 0;
nodes = get_nodes_in_cpumask(node_to_cpumask, cpu_mask, &nodemsk);
/*
genirq/affinity: Fix node generation from cpumask Commit 34c3d9819fda ("genirq/affinity: Provide smarter irq spreading infrastructure") introduced a better IRQ spreading mechanism, taking account of the available NUMA nodes in the machine. Problem is that the algorithm of retrieving the nodemask iterates "linearly" based on the number of online nodes - some architectures present non-linear node distribution among the nodemask, like PowerPC. If this is the case, the algorithm lead to a wrong node count number and therefore to a bad/incomplete IRQ affinity distribution. For example, this problem were found in a machine with 128 CPUs and two nodes, namely nodes 0 and 8 (instead of 0 and 1, if it was linearly distributed). This led to a wrong affinity distribution which then led to a bad mq allocation for nvme driver. Finally, we take the opportunity to fix a comment regarding the affinity distribution when we have _more_ nodes than vectors. Fixes: 34c3d9819fda ("genirq/affinity: Provide smarter irq spreading infrastructure") Reported-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <gabriel@krisman.be> Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <gabriel@krisman.be> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: hch@lst.de Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1481738472-2671-1-git-send-email-gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2016-12-15 02:01:12 +08:00
* If the number of nodes in the mask is greater than or equal the
* number of vectors we just spread the vectors across the nodes.
*/
if (numvecs <= nodes) {
for_each_node_mask(n, nodemsk) {
cpumask_copy(masks + curvec, node_to_cpumask[n]);
if (++done == numvecs)
break;
if (++curvec == last_affv)
curvec = affd->pre_vectors;
}
goto out;
}
for_each_node_mask(n, nodemsk) {
int ncpus, v, vecs_to_assign, vecs_per_node;
/* Spread the vectors per node */
vecs_per_node = (numvecs - (curvec - affd->pre_vectors)) / nodes;
/* Get the cpus on this node which are in the mask */
cpumask_and(nmsk, cpu_mask, node_to_cpumask[n]);
/* Calculate the number of cpus per vector */
ncpus = cpumask_weight(nmsk);
vecs_to_assign = min(vecs_per_node, ncpus);
/* Account for rounding errors */
extra_vecs = ncpus - vecs_to_assign * (ncpus / vecs_to_assign);
for (v = 0; curvec < last_affv && v < vecs_to_assign;
curvec++, v++) {
cpus_per_vec = ncpus / vecs_to_assign;
/* Account for extra vectors to compensate rounding errors */
if (extra_vecs) {
cpus_per_vec++;
--extra_vecs;
}
irq_spread_init_one(masks + curvec, nmsk, cpus_per_vec);
}
done += v;
if (done >= numvecs)
break;
if (curvec >= last_affv)
curvec = affd->pre_vectors;
--nodes;
}
out:
return done;
}
/**
* irq_create_affinity_masks - Create affinity masks for multiqueue spreading
* @nvecs: The total number of vectors
* @affd: Description of the affinity requirements
*
* Returns the masks pointer or NULL if allocation failed.
*/
struct cpumask *
irq_create_affinity_masks(int nvecs, const struct irq_affinity *affd)
{
genirq/affinity: Spread irq vectors among present CPUs as far as possible Commit 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs") tried to spread the interrupts accross all possible CPUs to make sure that in case of phsyical hotplug (e.g. virtualization) the CPUs which get plugged in after the device was initialized are targeted by a hardware queue and the corresponding interrupt. This has a downside in cases where the ACPI tables claim that there are more possible CPUs than present CPUs and the number of interrupts to spread out is smaller than the number of possible CPUs. These bogus ACPI tables are unfortunately not uncommon. In such a case the vector spreading algorithm assigns interrupts to CPUs which can never be utilized and as a consequence these interrupts are unused instead of being mapped to present CPUs. As a result the performance of the device is suboptimal. To fix this spread the interrupt vectors in two stages: 1) Spread as many interrupts as possible among the present CPUs 2) Spread the remaining vectors among non present CPUs On a 8 core system, where CPU 0-3 are present and CPU 4-7 are not present, for a device with 4 queues the resulting interrupt affinity is: 1) Before 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs") irq 39, cpu list 0 irq 40, cpu list 1 irq 41, cpu list 2 irq 42, cpu list 3 2) With 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs") irq 39, cpu list 0-2 irq 40, cpu list 3-4,6 irq 41, cpu list 5 irq 42, cpu list 7 3) With the refined vector spread applied: irq 39, cpu list 0,4 irq 40, cpu list 1,6 irq 41, cpu list 2,5 irq 42, cpu list 3,7 On a 8 core system, where all CPUs are present the resulting interrupt affinity for the 4 queues is: irq 39, cpu list 0,1 irq 40, cpu list 2,3 irq 41, cpu list 4,5 irq 42, cpu list 6,7 This is independent of the number of CPUs which are online at the point of initialization because in such a system the offline CPUs can be easily onlined afterwards, while in non-present CPUs need to be plugged physically or virtually which requires external interaction. The downside of this approach is that in case of physical hotplug the interrupt vector spreading might be suboptimal when CPUs 4-7 are physically plugged. Suboptimal from a NUMA point of view and due to the single target nature of interrupt affinities the later plugged CPUs might not be targeted by interrupts at all. Though, physical hotplug systems are not the common case while the broken ACPI table disease is wide spread. So it's preferred to have as many interrupts as possible utilized at the point where the device is initialized. Block multi-queue devices like NVME create a hardware queue per possible CPU, so the goal of commit 84676c1f21 to assign one interrupt vector per possible CPU is still achieved even with physical/virtual hotplug. [ tglx: Changed from online to present CPUs for the first spreading stage, renamed variables for readability sake, added comments and massaged changelog ] Reported-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180308105358.1506-5-ming.lei@redhat.com
2018-03-08 18:53:58 +08:00
int affvecs = nvecs - affd->pre_vectors - affd->post_vectors;
int curvec, usedvecs;
cpumask_var_t nmsk, npresmsk, *node_to_cpumask;
struct cpumask *masks = NULL;
/*
* If there aren't any vectors left after applying the pre/post
* vectors don't bother with assigning affinity.
*/
if (nvecs == affd->pre_vectors + affd->post_vectors)
return NULL;
if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&nmsk, GFP_KERNEL))
return NULL;
genirq/affinity: Spread irq vectors among present CPUs as far as possible Commit 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs") tried to spread the interrupts accross all possible CPUs to make sure that in case of phsyical hotplug (e.g. virtualization) the CPUs which get plugged in after the device was initialized are targeted by a hardware queue and the corresponding interrupt. This has a downside in cases where the ACPI tables claim that there are more possible CPUs than present CPUs and the number of interrupts to spread out is smaller than the number of possible CPUs. These bogus ACPI tables are unfortunately not uncommon. In such a case the vector spreading algorithm assigns interrupts to CPUs which can never be utilized and as a consequence these interrupts are unused instead of being mapped to present CPUs. As a result the performance of the device is suboptimal. To fix this spread the interrupt vectors in two stages: 1) Spread as many interrupts as possible among the present CPUs 2) Spread the remaining vectors among non present CPUs On a 8 core system, where CPU 0-3 are present and CPU 4-7 are not present, for a device with 4 queues the resulting interrupt affinity is: 1) Before 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs") irq 39, cpu list 0 irq 40, cpu list 1 irq 41, cpu list 2 irq 42, cpu list 3 2) With 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs") irq 39, cpu list 0-2 irq 40, cpu list 3-4,6 irq 41, cpu list 5 irq 42, cpu list 7 3) With the refined vector spread applied: irq 39, cpu list 0,4 irq 40, cpu list 1,6 irq 41, cpu list 2,5 irq 42, cpu list 3,7 On a 8 core system, where all CPUs are present the resulting interrupt affinity for the 4 queues is: irq 39, cpu list 0,1 irq 40, cpu list 2,3 irq 41, cpu list 4,5 irq 42, cpu list 6,7 This is independent of the number of CPUs which are online at the point of initialization because in such a system the offline CPUs can be easily onlined afterwards, while in non-present CPUs need to be plugged physically or virtually which requires external interaction. The downside of this approach is that in case of physical hotplug the interrupt vector spreading might be suboptimal when CPUs 4-7 are physically plugged. Suboptimal from a NUMA point of view and due to the single target nature of interrupt affinities the later plugged CPUs might not be targeted by interrupts at all. Though, physical hotplug systems are not the common case while the broken ACPI table disease is wide spread. So it's preferred to have as many interrupts as possible utilized at the point where the device is initialized. Block multi-queue devices like NVME create a hardware queue per possible CPU, so the goal of commit 84676c1f21 to assign one interrupt vector per possible CPU is still achieved even with physical/virtual hotplug. [ tglx: Changed from online to present CPUs for the first spreading stage, renamed variables for readability sake, added comments and massaged changelog ] Reported-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180308105358.1506-5-ming.lei@redhat.com
2018-03-08 18:53:58 +08:00
if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&npresmsk, GFP_KERNEL))
goto outcpumsk;
node_to_cpumask = alloc_node_to_cpumask();
if (!node_to_cpumask)
genirq/affinity: Spread irq vectors among present CPUs as far as possible Commit 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs") tried to spread the interrupts accross all possible CPUs to make sure that in case of phsyical hotplug (e.g. virtualization) the CPUs which get plugged in after the device was initialized are targeted by a hardware queue and the corresponding interrupt. This has a downside in cases where the ACPI tables claim that there are more possible CPUs than present CPUs and the number of interrupts to spread out is smaller than the number of possible CPUs. These bogus ACPI tables are unfortunately not uncommon. In such a case the vector spreading algorithm assigns interrupts to CPUs which can never be utilized and as a consequence these interrupts are unused instead of being mapped to present CPUs. As a result the performance of the device is suboptimal. To fix this spread the interrupt vectors in two stages: 1) Spread as many interrupts as possible among the present CPUs 2) Spread the remaining vectors among non present CPUs On a 8 core system, where CPU 0-3 are present and CPU 4-7 are not present, for a device with 4 queues the resulting interrupt affinity is: 1) Before 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs") irq 39, cpu list 0 irq 40, cpu list 1 irq 41, cpu list 2 irq 42, cpu list 3 2) With 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs") irq 39, cpu list 0-2 irq 40, cpu list 3-4,6 irq 41, cpu list 5 irq 42, cpu list 7 3) With the refined vector spread applied: irq 39, cpu list 0,4 irq 40, cpu list 1,6 irq 41, cpu list 2,5 irq 42, cpu list 3,7 On a 8 core system, where all CPUs are present the resulting interrupt affinity for the 4 queues is: irq 39, cpu list 0,1 irq 40, cpu list 2,3 irq 41, cpu list 4,5 irq 42, cpu list 6,7 This is independent of the number of CPUs which are online at the point of initialization because in such a system the offline CPUs can be easily onlined afterwards, while in non-present CPUs need to be plugged physically or virtually which requires external interaction. The downside of this approach is that in case of physical hotplug the interrupt vector spreading might be suboptimal when CPUs 4-7 are physically plugged. Suboptimal from a NUMA point of view and due to the single target nature of interrupt affinities the later plugged CPUs might not be targeted by interrupts at all. Though, physical hotplug systems are not the common case while the broken ACPI table disease is wide spread. So it's preferred to have as many interrupts as possible utilized at the point where the device is initialized. Block multi-queue devices like NVME create a hardware queue per possible CPU, so the goal of commit 84676c1f21 to assign one interrupt vector per possible CPU is still achieved even with physical/virtual hotplug. [ tglx: Changed from online to present CPUs for the first spreading stage, renamed variables for readability sake, added comments and massaged changelog ] Reported-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180308105358.1506-5-ming.lei@redhat.com
2018-03-08 18:53:58 +08:00
goto outnpresmsk;
masks = kcalloc(nvecs, sizeof(*masks), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!masks)
goto outnodemsk;
/* Fill out vectors at the beginning that don't need affinity */
for (curvec = 0; curvec < affd->pre_vectors; curvec++)
cpumask_copy(masks + curvec, irq_default_affinity);
/* Stabilize the cpumasks */
get_online_cpus();
build_node_to_cpumask(node_to_cpumask);
genirq/affinity: Spread irq vectors among present CPUs as far as possible Commit 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs") tried to spread the interrupts accross all possible CPUs to make sure that in case of phsyical hotplug (e.g. virtualization) the CPUs which get plugged in after the device was initialized are targeted by a hardware queue and the corresponding interrupt. This has a downside in cases where the ACPI tables claim that there are more possible CPUs than present CPUs and the number of interrupts to spread out is smaller than the number of possible CPUs. These bogus ACPI tables are unfortunately not uncommon. In such a case the vector spreading algorithm assigns interrupts to CPUs which can never be utilized and as a consequence these interrupts are unused instead of being mapped to present CPUs. As a result the performance of the device is suboptimal. To fix this spread the interrupt vectors in two stages: 1) Spread as many interrupts as possible among the present CPUs 2) Spread the remaining vectors among non present CPUs On a 8 core system, where CPU 0-3 are present and CPU 4-7 are not present, for a device with 4 queues the resulting interrupt affinity is: 1) Before 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs") irq 39, cpu list 0 irq 40, cpu list 1 irq 41, cpu list 2 irq 42, cpu list 3 2) With 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs") irq 39, cpu list 0-2 irq 40, cpu list 3-4,6 irq 41, cpu list 5 irq 42, cpu list 7 3) With the refined vector spread applied: irq 39, cpu list 0,4 irq 40, cpu list 1,6 irq 41, cpu list 2,5 irq 42, cpu list 3,7 On a 8 core system, where all CPUs are present the resulting interrupt affinity for the 4 queues is: irq 39, cpu list 0,1 irq 40, cpu list 2,3 irq 41, cpu list 4,5 irq 42, cpu list 6,7 This is independent of the number of CPUs which are online at the point of initialization because in such a system the offline CPUs can be easily onlined afterwards, while in non-present CPUs need to be plugged physically or virtually which requires external interaction. The downside of this approach is that in case of physical hotplug the interrupt vector spreading might be suboptimal when CPUs 4-7 are physically plugged. Suboptimal from a NUMA point of view and due to the single target nature of interrupt affinities the later plugged CPUs might not be targeted by interrupts at all. Though, physical hotplug systems are not the common case while the broken ACPI table disease is wide spread. So it's preferred to have as many interrupts as possible utilized at the point where the device is initialized. Block multi-queue devices like NVME create a hardware queue per possible CPU, so the goal of commit 84676c1f21 to assign one interrupt vector per possible CPU is still achieved even with physical/virtual hotplug. [ tglx: Changed from online to present CPUs for the first spreading stage, renamed variables for readability sake, added comments and massaged changelog ] Reported-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180308105358.1506-5-ming.lei@redhat.com
2018-03-08 18:53:58 +08:00
/* Spread on present CPUs starting from affd->pre_vectors */
usedvecs = irq_build_affinity_masks(affd, curvec, affvecs,
node_to_cpumask, cpu_present_mask,
nmsk, masks);
/*
* Spread on non present CPUs starting from the next vector to be
* handled. If the spreading of present CPUs already exhausted the
* vector space, assign the non present CPUs to the already spread
* out vectors.
*/
if (usedvecs >= affvecs)
curvec = affd->pre_vectors;
else
curvec = affd->pre_vectors + usedvecs;
cpumask_andnot(npresmsk, cpu_possible_mask, cpu_present_mask);
usedvecs += irq_build_affinity_masks(affd, curvec, affvecs,
node_to_cpumask, npresmsk,
nmsk, masks);
put_online_cpus();
/* Fill out vectors at the end that don't need affinity */
genirq/affinity: Spread irq vectors among present CPUs as far as possible Commit 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs") tried to spread the interrupts accross all possible CPUs to make sure that in case of phsyical hotplug (e.g. virtualization) the CPUs which get plugged in after the device was initialized are targeted by a hardware queue and the corresponding interrupt. This has a downside in cases where the ACPI tables claim that there are more possible CPUs than present CPUs and the number of interrupts to spread out is smaller than the number of possible CPUs. These bogus ACPI tables are unfortunately not uncommon. In such a case the vector spreading algorithm assigns interrupts to CPUs which can never be utilized and as a consequence these interrupts are unused instead of being mapped to present CPUs. As a result the performance of the device is suboptimal. To fix this spread the interrupt vectors in two stages: 1) Spread as many interrupts as possible among the present CPUs 2) Spread the remaining vectors among non present CPUs On a 8 core system, where CPU 0-3 are present and CPU 4-7 are not present, for a device with 4 queues the resulting interrupt affinity is: 1) Before 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs") irq 39, cpu list 0 irq 40, cpu list 1 irq 41, cpu list 2 irq 42, cpu list 3 2) With 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs") irq 39, cpu list 0-2 irq 40, cpu list 3-4,6 irq 41, cpu list 5 irq 42, cpu list 7 3) With the refined vector spread applied: irq 39, cpu list 0,4 irq 40, cpu list 1,6 irq 41, cpu list 2,5 irq 42, cpu list 3,7 On a 8 core system, where all CPUs are present the resulting interrupt affinity for the 4 queues is: irq 39, cpu list 0,1 irq 40, cpu list 2,3 irq 41, cpu list 4,5 irq 42, cpu list 6,7 This is independent of the number of CPUs which are online at the point of initialization because in such a system the offline CPUs can be easily onlined afterwards, while in non-present CPUs need to be plugged physically or virtually which requires external interaction. The downside of this approach is that in case of physical hotplug the interrupt vector spreading might be suboptimal when CPUs 4-7 are physically plugged. Suboptimal from a NUMA point of view and due to the single target nature of interrupt affinities the later plugged CPUs might not be targeted by interrupts at all. Though, physical hotplug systems are not the common case while the broken ACPI table disease is wide spread. So it's preferred to have as many interrupts as possible utilized at the point where the device is initialized. Block multi-queue devices like NVME create a hardware queue per possible CPU, so the goal of commit 84676c1f21 to assign one interrupt vector per possible CPU is still achieved even with physical/virtual hotplug. [ tglx: Changed from online to present CPUs for the first spreading stage, renamed variables for readability sake, added comments and massaged changelog ] Reported-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180308105358.1506-5-ming.lei@redhat.com
2018-03-08 18:53:58 +08:00
if (usedvecs >= affvecs)
curvec = affd->pre_vectors + affvecs;
else
curvec = affd->pre_vectors + usedvecs;
for (; curvec < nvecs; curvec++)
cpumask_copy(masks + curvec, irq_default_affinity);
genirq/affinity: Spread irq vectors among present CPUs as far as possible Commit 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs") tried to spread the interrupts accross all possible CPUs to make sure that in case of phsyical hotplug (e.g. virtualization) the CPUs which get plugged in after the device was initialized are targeted by a hardware queue and the corresponding interrupt. This has a downside in cases where the ACPI tables claim that there are more possible CPUs than present CPUs and the number of interrupts to spread out is smaller than the number of possible CPUs. These bogus ACPI tables are unfortunately not uncommon. In such a case the vector spreading algorithm assigns interrupts to CPUs which can never be utilized and as a consequence these interrupts are unused instead of being mapped to present CPUs. As a result the performance of the device is suboptimal. To fix this spread the interrupt vectors in two stages: 1) Spread as many interrupts as possible among the present CPUs 2) Spread the remaining vectors among non present CPUs On a 8 core system, where CPU 0-3 are present and CPU 4-7 are not present, for a device with 4 queues the resulting interrupt affinity is: 1) Before 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs") irq 39, cpu list 0 irq 40, cpu list 1 irq 41, cpu list 2 irq 42, cpu list 3 2) With 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs") irq 39, cpu list 0-2 irq 40, cpu list 3-4,6 irq 41, cpu list 5 irq 42, cpu list 7 3) With the refined vector spread applied: irq 39, cpu list 0,4 irq 40, cpu list 1,6 irq 41, cpu list 2,5 irq 42, cpu list 3,7 On a 8 core system, where all CPUs are present the resulting interrupt affinity for the 4 queues is: irq 39, cpu list 0,1 irq 40, cpu list 2,3 irq 41, cpu list 4,5 irq 42, cpu list 6,7 This is independent of the number of CPUs which are online at the point of initialization because in such a system the offline CPUs can be easily onlined afterwards, while in non-present CPUs need to be plugged physically or virtually which requires external interaction. The downside of this approach is that in case of physical hotplug the interrupt vector spreading might be suboptimal when CPUs 4-7 are physically plugged. Suboptimal from a NUMA point of view and due to the single target nature of interrupt affinities the later plugged CPUs might not be targeted by interrupts at all. Though, physical hotplug systems are not the common case while the broken ACPI table disease is wide spread. So it's preferred to have as many interrupts as possible utilized at the point where the device is initialized. Block multi-queue devices like NVME create a hardware queue per possible CPU, so the goal of commit 84676c1f21 to assign one interrupt vector per possible CPU is still achieved even with physical/virtual hotplug. [ tglx: Changed from online to present CPUs for the first spreading stage, renamed variables for readability sake, added comments and massaged changelog ] Reported-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180308105358.1506-5-ming.lei@redhat.com
2018-03-08 18:53:58 +08:00
outnodemsk:
free_node_to_cpumask(node_to_cpumask);
genirq/affinity: Spread irq vectors among present CPUs as far as possible Commit 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs") tried to spread the interrupts accross all possible CPUs to make sure that in case of phsyical hotplug (e.g. virtualization) the CPUs which get plugged in after the device was initialized are targeted by a hardware queue and the corresponding interrupt. This has a downside in cases where the ACPI tables claim that there are more possible CPUs than present CPUs and the number of interrupts to spread out is smaller than the number of possible CPUs. These bogus ACPI tables are unfortunately not uncommon. In such a case the vector spreading algorithm assigns interrupts to CPUs which can never be utilized and as a consequence these interrupts are unused instead of being mapped to present CPUs. As a result the performance of the device is suboptimal. To fix this spread the interrupt vectors in two stages: 1) Spread as many interrupts as possible among the present CPUs 2) Spread the remaining vectors among non present CPUs On a 8 core system, where CPU 0-3 are present and CPU 4-7 are not present, for a device with 4 queues the resulting interrupt affinity is: 1) Before 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs") irq 39, cpu list 0 irq 40, cpu list 1 irq 41, cpu list 2 irq 42, cpu list 3 2) With 84676c1f21 ("genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs") irq 39, cpu list 0-2 irq 40, cpu list 3-4,6 irq 41, cpu list 5 irq 42, cpu list 7 3) With the refined vector spread applied: irq 39, cpu list 0,4 irq 40, cpu list 1,6 irq 41, cpu list 2,5 irq 42, cpu list 3,7 On a 8 core system, where all CPUs are present the resulting interrupt affinity for the 4 queues is: irq 39, cpu list 0,1 irq 40, cpu list 2,3 irq 41, cpu list 4,5 irq 42, cpu list 6,7 This is independent of the number of CPUs which are online at the point of initialization because in such a system the offline CPUs can be easily onlined afterwards, while in non-present CPUs need to be plugged physically or virtually which requires external interaction. The downside of this approach is that in case of physical hotplug the interrupt vector spreading might be suboptimal when CPUs 4-7 are physically plugged. Suboptimal from a NUMA point of view and due to the single target nature of interrupt affinities the later plugged CPUs might not be targeted by interrupts at all. Though, physical hotplug systems are not the common case while the broken ACPI table disease is wide spread. So it's preferred to have as many interrupts as possible utilized at the point where the device is initialized. Block multi-queue devices like NVME create a hardware queue per possible CPU, so the goal of commit 84676c1f21 to assign one interrupt vector per possible CPU is still achieved even with physical/virtual hotplug. [ tglx: Changed from online to present CPUs for the first spreading stage, renamed variables for readability sake, added comments and massaged changelog ] Reported-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180308105358.1506-5-ming.lei@redhat.com
2018-03-08 18:53:58 +08:00
outnpresmsk:
free_cpumask_var(npresmsk);
outcpumsk:
free_cpumask_var(nmsk);
return masks;
}
/**
* irq_calc_affinity_vectors - Calculate the optimal number of vectors
* @minvec: The minimum number of vectors available
* @maxvec: The maximum number of vectors available
* @affd: Description of the affinity requirements
*/
int irq_calc_affinity_vectors(int minvec, int maxvec, const struct irq_affinity *affd)
{
int resv = affd->pre_vectors + affd->post_vectors;
int vecs = maxvec - resv;
int ret;
if (resv > minvec)
return 0;
get_online_cpus();
ret = min_t(int, cpumask_weight(cpu_possible_mask), vecs) + resv;
put_online_cpus();
return ret;
}