linux_old1/tools/perf/util/parse-options.c

590 lines
14 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

#include "util.h"
#include "parse-options.h"
#include "cache.h"
2012-07-30 10:53:51 +08:00
#include "header.h"
#define OPT_SHORT 1
#define OPT_UNSET 2
static int opterror(const struct option *opt, const char *reason, int flags)
{
if (flags & OPT_SHORT)
return error("switch `%c' %s", opt->short_name, reason);
if (flags & OPT_UNSET)
return error("option `no-%s' %s", opt->long_name, reason);
return error("option `%s' %s", opt->long_name, reason);
}
static int get_arg(struct parse_opt_ctx_t *p, const struct option *opt,
int flags, const char **arg)
{
if (p->opt) {
*arg = p->opt;
p->opt = NULL;
} else if ((opt->flags & PARSE_OPT_LASTARG_DEFAULT) && (p->argc == 1 ||
**(p->argv + 1) == '-')) {
*arg = (const char *)opt->defval;
} else if (p->argc > 1) {
p->argc--;
*arg = *++p->argv;
} else
return opterror(opt, "requires a value", flags);
return 0;
}
static int get_value(struct parse_opt_ctx_t *p,
const struct option *opt, int flags)
{
const char *s, *arg = NULL;
const int unset = flags & OPT_UNSET;
if (unset && p->opt)
return opterror(opt, "takes no value", flags);
if (unset && (opt->flags & PARSE_OPT_NONEG))
return opterror(opt, "isn't available", flags);
if (!(flags & OPT_SHORT) && p->opt) {
switch (opt->type) {
case OPTION_CALLBACK:
if (!(opt->flags & PARSE_OPT_NOARG))
break;
/* FALLTHROUGH */
case OPTION_BOOLEAN:
perf: Fix endianness argument compatibility with OPT_BOOLEAN() and introduce OPT_INCR() Parsing an option from the command line with OPT_BOOLEAN on a bool data type would not work on a big-endian machine due to the manner in which the boolean was being cast into an int and incremented. For example, running 'perf probe --list' on a PowerPC machine would fail to properly set the list_events bool and would therefore print out the usage information and terminate. This patch makes OPT_BOOLEAN work as expected with a bool datatype. For cases where the original OPT_BOOLEAN was intentionally being used to increment an int each time it was passed in on the command line, this patch introduces OPT_INCR with the old behaviour of OPT_BOOLEAN (the verbose variable is currently the only such example of this). I have reviewed every use of OPT_BOOLEAN to verify that a true C99 bool was passed. Where integers were used, I verified that they were only being used for boolean logic and changed them to bools to ensure that they would not be mistakenly used as ints. The major exception was the verbose variable which now uses OPT_INCR instead of OPT_BOOLEAN. Signed-off-by: Ian Munsie <imunsie@au.ibm.com> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # NOTE: wont apply to .3[34].x cleanly, please backport Cc: Git development list <git@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Ian Munsie <imunsie@au1.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Eric B Munson <ebmunson@us.ibm.com> Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: WANG Cong <amwang@redhat.com> Cc: Thiago Farina <tfransosi@gmail.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com> Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com> Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> LKML-Reference: <1271147857-11604-1-git-send-email-imunsie@au.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-04-13 16:37:33 +08:00
case OPTION_INCR:
case OPTION_BIT:
case OPTION_SET_UINT:
case OPTION_SET_PTR:
return opterror(opt, "takes no value", flags);
perf: Enable more compiler warnings Related to a shadowed variable bug fix Valdis Kletnieks noticed that perf does not get built with -Wshadow, which could have helped us avoid the bug. So enable -Wshadow and also enable the following warnings on perf builds, in addition to the already enabled -Wall -Wextra -std=gnu99 warnings: -Wcast-align -Wformat=2 -Wshadow -Winit-self -Wpacked -Wredundant-decls -Wstack-protector -Wstrict-aliasing=3 -Wswitch-default -Wswitch-enum -Wno-system-headers -Wundef -Wvolatile-register-var -Wwrite-strings -Wbad-function-cast -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wold-style-definition -Wstrict-prototypes -Wdeclaration-after-statement And change/fix the perf code to build cleanly under GCC 4.3.2. The list of warnings enablement is rather arbitrary: it's based on my (quick) reading of the GCC manpages and trying them on perf. I categorized the warnings based on individually enabling them and looking whether they trigger something in the perf build. If i liked those warnings (i.e. if they trigger for something that arguably could be improved) i enabled the warning. If the warnings seemed to come from language laywers spamming the build with tons of nuisance warnings i generally kept them off. Most of the sign conversion related warnings were in this category. (A second patch enabling some of the sign warnings might be welcome - sign bugs can be nasty.) I also kept warnings that seem to make sense from their manpage description and which produced no actual warnings on our code base. These warnings might still be turned off if they end up being a nuisance. I also left out a few warnings that are not supported in older compilers. [ Note that these changes might break the build on older compilers i did not test, or on non-x86 architectures that produce different warnings, so more testing would be welcome. ] Reported-by: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-08-15 18:26:57 +08:00
case OPTION_END:
case OPTION_ARGUMENT:
case OPTION_GROUP:
case OPTION_STRING:
case OPTION_INTEGER:
case OPTION_UINTEGER:
perf: Enable more compiler warnings Related to a shadowed variable bug fix Valdis Kletnieks noticed that perf does not get built with -Wshadow, which could have helped us avoid the bug. So enable -Wshadow and also enable the following warnings on perf builds, in addition to the already enabled -Wall -Wextra -std=gnu99 warnings: -Wcast-align -Wformat=2 -Wshadow -Winit-self -Wpacked -Wredundant-decls -Wstack-protector -Wstrict-aliasing=3 -Wswitch-default -Wswitch-enum -Wno-system-headers -Wundef -Wvolatile-register-var -Wwrite-strings -Wbad-function-cast -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wold-style-definition -Wstrict-prototypes -Wdeclaration-after-statement And change/fix the perf code to build cleanly under GCC 4.3.2. The list of warnings enablement is rather arbitrary: it's based on my (quick) reading of the GCC manpages and trying them on perf. I categorized the warnings based on individually enabling them and looking whether they trigger something in the perf build. If i liked those warnings (i.e. if they trigger for something that arguably could be improved) i enabled the warning. If the warnings seemed to come from language laywers spamming the build with tons of nuisance warnings i generally kept them off. Most of the sign conversion related warnings were in this category. (A second patch enabling some of the sign warnings might be welcome - sign bugs can be nasty.) I also kept warnings that seem to make sense from their manpage description and which produced no actual warnings on our code base. These warnings might still be turned off if they end up being a nuisance. I also left out a few warnings that are not supported in older compilers. [ Note that these changes might break the build on older compilers i did not test, or on non-x86 architectures that produce different warnings, so more testing would be welcome. ] Reported-by: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-08-15 18:26:57 +08:00
case OPTION_LONG:
case OPTION_U64:
default:
break;
}
}
switch (opt->type) {
case OPTION_BIT:
if (unset)
*(int *)opt->value &= ~opt->defval;
else
*(int *)opt->value |= opt->defval;
return 0;
case OPTION_BOOLEAN:
perf: Fix endianness argument compatibility with OPT_BOOLEAN() and introduce OPT_INCR() Parsing an option from the command line with OPT_BOOLEAN on a bool data type would not work on a big-endian machine due to the manner in which the boolean was being cast into an int and incremented. For example, running 'perf probe --list' on a PowerPC machine would fail to properly set the list_events bool and would therefore print out the usage information and terminate. This patch makes OPT_BOOLEAN work as expected with a bool datatype. For cases where the original OPT_BOOLEAN was intentionally being used to increment an int each time it was passed in on the command line, this patch introduces OPT_INCR with the old behaviour of OPT_BOOLEAN (the verbose variable is currently the only such example of this). I have reviewed every use of OPT_BOOLEAN to verify that a true C99 bool was passed. Where integers were used, I verified that they were only being used for boolean logic and changed them to bools to ensure that they would not be mistakenly used as ints. The major exception was the verbose variable which now uses OPT_INCR instead of OPT_BOOLEAN. Signed-off-by: Ian Munsie <imunsie@au.ibm.com> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # NOTE: wont apply to .3[34].x cleanly, please backport Cc: Git development list <git@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Ian Munsie <imunsie@au1.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Eric B Munson <ebmunson@us.ibm.com> Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: WANG Cong <amwang@redhat.com> Cc: Thiago Farina <tfransosi@gmail.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com> Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com> Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> LKML-Reference: <1271147857-11604-1-git-send-email-imunsie@au.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-04-13 16:37:33 +08:00
*(bool *)opt->value = unset ? false : true;
return 0;
case OPTION_INCR:
*(int *)opt->value = unset ? 0 : *(int *)opt->value + 1;
return 0;
case OPTION_SET_UINT:
*(unsigned int *)opt->value = unset ? 0 : opt->defval;
return 0;
case OPTION_SET_PTR:
*(void **)opt->value = unset ? NULL : (void *)opt->defval;
return 0;
case OPTION_STRING:
if (unset)
*(const char **)opt->value = NULL;
else if (opt->flags & PARSE_OPT_OPTARG && !p->opt)
*(const char **)opt->value = (const char *)opt->defval;
else
return get_arg(p, opt, flags, (const char **)opt->value);
return 0;
case OPTION_CALLBACK:
if (unset)
return (*opt->callback)(opt, NULL, 1) ? (-1) : 0;
if (opt->flags & PARSE_OPT_NOARG)
return (*opt->callback)(opt, NULL, 0) ? (-1) : 0;
if (opt->flags & PARSE_OPT_OPTARG && !p->opt)
return (*opt->callback)(opt, NULL, 0) ? (-1) : 0;
if (get_arg(p, opt, flags, &arg))
return -1;
return (*opt->callback)(opt, arg, 0) ? (-1) : 0;
case OPTION_INTEGER:
if (unset) {
*(int *)opt->value = 0;
return 0;
}
if (opt->flags & PARSE_OPT_OPTARG && !p->opt) {
*(int *)opt->value = opt->defval;
return 0;
}
if (get_arg(p, opt, flags, &arg))
return -1;
*(int *)opt->value = strtol(arg, (char **)&s, 10);
if (*s)
return opterror(opt, "expects a numerical value", flags);
return 0;
case OPTION_UINTEGER:
if (unset) {
*(unsigned int *)opt->value = 0;
return 0;
}
if (opt->flags & PARSE_OPT_OPTARG && !p->opt) {
*(unsigned int *)opt->value = opt->defval;
return 0;
}
if (get_arg(p, opt, flags, &arg))
return -1;
*(unsigned int *)opt->value = strtol(arg, (char **)&s, 10);
if (*s)
return opterror(opt, "expects a numerical value", flags);
return 0;
case OPTION_LONG:
if (unset) {
*(long *)opt->value = 0;
return 0;
}
if (opt->flags & PARSE_OPT_OPTARG && !p->opt) {
*(long *)opt->value = opt->defval;
return 0;
}
if (get_arg(p, opt, flags, &arg))
return -1;
*(long *)opt->value = strtol(arg, (char **)&s, 10);
if (*s)
return opterror(opt, "expects a numerical value", flags);
return 0;
case OPTION_U64:
if (unset) {
*(u64 *)opt->value = 0;
return 0;
}
if (opt->flags & PARSE_OPT_OPTARG && !p->opt) {
*(u64 *)opt->value = opt->defval;
return 0;
}
if (get_arg(p, opt, flags, &arg))
return -1;
*(u64 *)opt->value = strtoull(arg, (char **)&s, 10);
if (*s)
return opterror(opt, "expects a numerical value", flags);
return 0;
perf: Enable more compiler warnings Related to a shadowed variable bug fix Valdis Kletnieks noticed that perf does not get built with -Wshadow, which could have helped us avoid the bug. So enable -Wshadow and also enable the following warnings on perf builds, in addition to the already enabled -Wall -Wextra -std=gnu99 warnings: -Wcast-align -Wformat=2 -Wshadow -Winit-self -Wpacked -Wredundant-decls -Wstack-protector -Wstrict-aliasing=3 -Wswitch-default -Wswitch-enum -Wno-system-headers -Wundef -Wvolatile-register-var -Wwrite-strings -Wbad-function-cast -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wold-style-definition -Wstrict-prototypes -Wdeclaration-after-statement And change/fix the perf code to build cleanly under GCC 4.3.2. The list of warnings enablement is rather arbitrary: it's based on my (quick) reading of the GCC manpages and trying them on perf. I categorized the warnings based on individually enabling them and looking whether they trigger something in the perf build. If i liked those warnings (i.e. if they trigger for something that arguably could be improved) i enabled the warning. If the warnings seemed to come from language laywers spamming the build with tons of nuisance warnings i generally kept them off. Most of the sign conversion related warnings were in this category. (A second patch enabling some of the sign warnings might be welcome - sign bugs can be nasty.) I also kept warnings that seem to make sense from their manpage description and which produced no actual warnings on our code base. These warnings might still be turned off if they end up being a nuisance. I also left out a few warnings that are not supported in older compilers. [ Note that these changes might break the build on older compilers i did not test, or on non-x86 architectures that produce different warnings, so more testing would be welcome. ] Reported-by: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-08-15 18:26:57 +08:00
case OPTION_END:
case OPTION_ARGUMENT:
case OPTION_GROUP:
default:
die("should not happen, someone must be hit on the forehead");
}
}
static int parse_short_opt(struct parse_opt_ctx_t *p, const struct option *options)
{
for (; options->type != OPTION_END; options++) {
if (options->short_name == *p->opt) {
p->opt = p->opt[1] ? p->opt + 1 : NULL;
return get_value(p, options, OPT_SHORT);
}
}
return -2;
}
static int parse_long_opt(struct parse_opt_ctx_t *p, const char *arg,
const struct option *options)
{
const char *arg_end = strchr(arg, '=');
const struct option *abbrev_option = NULL, *ambiguous_option = NULL;
int abbrev_flags = 0, ambiguous_flags = 0;
if (!arg_end)
arg_end = arg + strlen(arg);
for (; options->type != OPTION_END; options++) {
const char *rest;
int flags = 0;
if (!options->long_name)
continue;
rest = skip_prefix(arg, options->long_name);
if (options->type == OPTION_ARGUMENT) {
if (!rest)
continue;
if (*rest == '=')
return opterror(options, "takes no value", flags);
if (*rest)
continue;
p->out[p->cpidx++] = arg - 2;
return 0;
}
if (!rest) {
/* abbreviated? */
if (!strncmp(options->long_name, arg, arg_end - arg)) {
is_abbreviated:
if (abbrev_option) {
/*
* If this is abbreviated, it is
* ambiguous. So when there is no
* exact match later, we need to
* error out.
*/
ambiguous_option = abbrev_option;
ambiguous_flags = abbrev_flags;
}
if (!(flags & OPT_UNSET) && *arg_end)
p->opt = arg_end + 1;
abbrev_option = options;
abbrev_flags = flags;
continue;
}
/* negated and abbreviated very much? */
if (!prefixcmp("no-", arg)) {
flags |= OPT_UNSET;
goto is_abbreviated;
}
/* negated? */
if (strncmp(arg, "no-", 3))
continue;
flags |= OPT_UNSET;
rest = skip_prefix(arg + 3, options->long_name);
/* abbreviated and negated? */
if (!rest && !prefixcmp(options->long_name, arg + 3))
goto is_abbreviated;
if (!rest)
continue;
}
if (*rest) {
if (*rest != '=')
continue;
p->opt = rest + 1;
}
return get_value(p, options, flags);
}
if (ambiguous_option)
return error("Ambiguous option: %s "
"(could be --%s%s or --%s%s)",
arg,
(ambiguous_flags & OPT_UNSET) ? "no-" : "",
ambiguous_option->long_name,
(abbrev_flags & OPT_UNSET) ? "no-" : "",
abbrev_option->long_name);
if (abbrev_option)
return get_value(p, abbrev_option, abbrev_flags);
return -2;
}
static void check_typos(const char *arg, const struct option *options)
{
if (strlen(arg) < 3)
return;
if (!prefixcmp(arg, "no-")) {
error ("did you mean `--%s` (with two dashes ?)", arg);
exit(129);
}
for (; options->type != OPTION_END; options++) {
if (!options->long_name)
continue;
if (!prefixcmp(options->long_name, arg)) {
error ("did you mean `--%s` (with two dashes ?)", arg);
exit(129);
}
}
}
void parse_options_start(struct parse_opt_ctx_t *ctx,
int argc, const char **argv, int flags)
{
memset(ctx, 0, sizeof(*ctx));
ctx->argc = argc - 1;
ctx->argv = argv + 1;
ctx->out = argv;
ctx->cpidx = ((flags & PARSE_OPT_KEEP_ARGV0) != 0);
ctx->flags = flags;
if ((flags & PARSE_OPT_KEEP_UNKNOWN) &&
(flags & PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION))
die("STOP_AT_NON_OPTION and KEEP_UNKNOWN don't go together");
}
static int usage_with_options_internal(const char * const *,
const struct option *, int);
int parse_options_step(struct parse_opt_ctx_t *ctx,
const struct option *options,
const char * const usagestr[])
{
int internal_help = !(ctx->flags & PARSE_OPT_NO_INTERNAL_HELP);
/* we must reset ->opt, unknown short option leave it dangling */
ctx->opt = NULL;
for (; ctx->argc; ctx->argc--, ctx->argv++) {
const char *arg = ctx->argv[0];
if (*arg != '-' || !arg[1]) {
if (ctx->flags & PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION)
break;
ctx->out[ctx->cpidx++] = ctx->argv[0];
continue;
}
if (arg[1] != '-') {
ctx->opt = arg + 1;
if (internal_help && *ctx->opt == 'h')
return parse_options_usage(usagestr, options);
switch (parse_short_opt(ctx, options)) {
case -1:
return parse_options_usage(usagestr, options);
case -2:
goto unknown;
perf: Enable more compiler warnings Related to a shadowed variable bug fix Valdis Kletnieks noticed that perf does not get built with -Wshadow, which could have helped us avoid the bug. So enable -Wshadow and also enable the following warnings on perf builds, in addition to the already enabled -Wall -Wextra -std=gnu99 warnings: -Wcast-align -Wformat=2 -Wshadow -Winit-self -Wpacked -Wredundant-decls -Wstack-protector -Wstrict-aliasing=3 -Wswitch-default -Wswitch-enum -Wno-system-headers -Wundef -Wvolatile-register-var -Wwrite-strings -Wbad-function-cast -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wold-style-definition -Wstrict-prototypes -Wdeclaration-after-statement And change/fix the perf code to build cleanly under GCC 4.3.2. The list of warnings enablement is rather arbitrary: it's based on my (quick) reading of the GCC manpages and trying them on perf. I categorized the warnings based on individually enabling them and looking whether they trigger something in the perf build. If i liked those warnings (i.e. if they trigger for something that arguably could be improved) i enabled the warning. If the warnings seemed to come from language laywers spamming the build with tons of nuisance warnings i generally kept them off. Most of the sign conversion related warnings were in this category. (A second patch enabling some of the sign warnings might be welcome - sign bugs can be nasty.) I also kept warnings that seem to make sense from their manpage description and which produced no actual warnings on our code base. These warnings might still be turned off if they end up being a nuisance. I also left out a few warnings that are not supported in older compilers. [ Note that these changes might break the build on older compilers i did not test, or on non-x86 architectures that produce different warnings, so more testing would be welcome. ] Reported-by: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-08-15 18:26:57 +08:00
default:
break;
}
if (ctx->opt)
check_typos(arg + 1, options);
while (ctx->opt) {
if (internal_help && *ctx->opt == 'h')
return parse_options_usage(usagestr, options);
switch (parse_short_opt(ctx, options)) {
case -1:
return parse_options_usage(usagestr, options);
case -2:
/* fake a short option thing to hide the fact that we may have
* started to parse aggregated stuff
*
* This is leaky, too bad.
*/
ctx->argv[0] = strdup(ctx->opt - 1);
*(char *)ctx->argv[0] = '-';
goto unknown;
perf: Enable more compiler warnings Related to a shadowed variable bug fix Valdis Kletnieks noticed that perf does not get built with -Wshadow, which could have helped us avoid the bug. So enable -Wshadow and also enable the following warnings on perf builds, in addition to the already enabled -Wall -Wextra -std=gnu99 warnings: -Wcast-align -Wformat=2 -Wshadow -Winit-self -Wpacked -Wredundant-decls -Wstack-protector -Wstrict-aliasing=3 -Wswitch-default -Wswitch-enum -Wno-system-headers -Wundef -Wvolatile-register-var -Wwrite-strings -Wbad-function-cast -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wold-style-definition -Wstrict-prototypes -Wdeclaration-after-statement And change/fix the perf code to build cleanly under GCC 4.3.2. The list of warnings enablement is rather arbitrary: it's based on my (quick) reading of the GCC manpages and trying them on perf. I categorized the warnings based on individually enabling them and looking whether they trigger something in the perf build. If i liked those warnings (i.e. if they trigger for something that arguably could be improved) i enabled the warning. If the warnings seemed to come from language laywers spamming the build with tons of nuisance warnings i generally kept them off. Most of the sign conversion related warnings were in this category. (A second patch enabling some of the sign warnings might be welcome - sign bugs can be nasty.) I also kept warnings that seem to make sense from their manpage description and which produced no actual warnings on our code base. These warnings might still be turned off if they end up being a nuisance. I also left out a few warnings that are not supported in older compilers. [ Note that these changes might break the build on older compilers i did not test, or on non-x86 architectures that produce different warnings, so more testing would be welcome. ] Reported-by: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-08-15 18:26:57 +08:00
default:
break;
}
}
continue;
}
if (!arg[2]) { /* "--" */
if (!(ctx->flags & PARSE_OPT_KEEP_DASHDASH)) {
ctx->argc--;
ctx->argv++;
}
break;
}
if (internal_help && !strcmp(arg + 2, "help-all"))
return usage_with_options_internal(usagestr, options, 1);
if (internal_help && !strcmp(arg + 2, "help"))
return parse_options_usage(usagestr, options);
if (!strcmp(arg + 2, "list-opts"))
return PARSE_OPT_LIST;
switch (parse_long_opt(ctx, arg + 2, options)) {
case -1:
return parse_options_usage(usagestr, options);
case -2:
goto unknown;
perf: Enable more compiler warnings Related to a shadowed variable bug fix Valdis Kletnieks noticed that perf does not get built with -Wshadow, which could have helped us avoid the bug. So enable -Wshadow and also enable the following warnings on perf builds, in addition to the already enabled -Wall -Wextra -std=gnu99 warnings: -Wcast-align -Wformat=2 -Wshadow -Winit-self -Wpacked -Wredundant-decls -Wstack-protector -Wstrict-aliasing=3 -Wswitch-default -Wswitch-enum -Wno-system-headers -Wundef -Wvolatile-register-var -Wwrite-strings -Wbad-function-cast -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wold-style-definition -Wstrict-prototypes -Wdeclaration-after-statement And change/fix the perf code to build cleanly under GCC 4.3.2. The list of warnings enablement is rather arbitrary: it's based on my (quick) reading of the GCC manpages and trying them on perf. I categorized the warnings based on individually enabling them and looking whether they trigger something in the perf build. If i liked those warnings (i.e. if they trigger for something that arguably could be improved) i enabled the warning. If the warnings seemed to come from language laywers spamming the build with tons of nuisance warnings i generally kept them off. Most of the sign conversion related warnings were in this category. (A second patch enabling some of the sign warnings might be welcome - sign bugs can be nasty.) I also kept warnings that seem to make sense from their manpage description and which produced no actual warnings on our code base. These warnings might still be turned off if they end up being a nuisance. I also left out a few warnings that are not supported in older compilers. [ Note that these changes might break the build on older compilers i did not test, or on non-x86 architectures that produce different warnings, so more testing would be welcome. ] Reported-by: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-08-15 18:26:57 +08:00
default:
break;
}
continue;
unknown:
if (!(ctx->flags & PARSE_OPT_KEEP_UNKNOWN))
return PARSE_OPT_UNKNOWN;
ctx->out[ctx->cpidx++] = ctx->argv[0];
ctx->opt = NULL;
}
return PARSE_OPT_DONE;
}
int parse_options_end(struct parse_opt_ctx_t *ctx)
{
memmove(ctx->out + ctx->cpidx, ctx->argv, ctx->argc * sizeof(*ctx->out));
ctx->out[ctx->cpidx + ctx->argc] = NULL;
return ctx->cpidx + ctx->argc;
}
int parse_options(int argc, const char **argv, const struct option *options,
const char * const usagestr[], int flags)
{
struct parse_opt_ctx_t ctx;
2012-07-30 10:53:51 +08:00
perf_header__set_cmdline(argc, argv);
parse_options_start(&ctx, argc, argv, flags);
switch (parse_options_step(&ctx, options, usagestr)) {
case PARSE_OPT_HELP:
exit(129);
case PARSE_OPT_DONE:
break;
case PARSE_OPT_LIST:
while (options->type != OPTION_END) {
printf("--%s ", options->long_name);
options++;
}
exit(130);
default: /* PARSE_OPT_UNKNOWN */
if (ctx.argv[0][1] == '-') {
error("unknown option `%s'", ctx.argv[0] + 2);
} else {
error("unknown switch `%c'", *ctx.opt);
}
usage_with_options(usagestr, options);
}
return parse_options_end(&ctx);
}
#define USAGE_OPTS_WIDTH 24
#define USAGE_GAP 2
int usage_with_options_internal(const char * const *usagestr,
const struct option *opts, int full)
{
if (!usagestr)
return PARSE_OPT_HELP;
fprintf(stderr, "\n usage: %s\n", *usagestr++);
while (*usagestr && **usagestr)
fprintf(stderr, " or: %s\n", *usagestr++);
while (*usagestr) {
fprintf(stderr, "%s%s\n",
**usagestr ? " " : "",
*usagestr);
usagestr++;
}
if (opts->type != OPTION_GROUP)
fputc('\n', stderr);
for (; opts->type != OPTION_END; opts++) {
size_t pos;
int pad;
if (opts->type == OPTION_GROUP) {
fputc('\n', stderr);
if (*opts->help)
fprintf(stderr, "%s\n", opts->help);
continue;
}
if (!full && (opts->flags & PARSE_OPT_HIDDEN))
continue;
pos = fprintf(stderr, " ");
if (opts->short_name)
pos += fprintf(stderr, "-%c", opts->short_name);
else
pos += fprintf(stderr, " ");
if (opts->long_name && opts->short_name)
pos += fprintf(stderr, ", ");
if (opts->long_name)
pos += fprintf(stderr, "--%s", opts->long_name);
switch (opts->type) {
case OPTION_ARGUMENT:
break;
case OPTION_LONG:
case OPTION_U64:
case OPTION_INTEGER:
case OPTION_UINTEGER:
if (opts->flags & PARSE_OPT_OPTARG)
if (opts->long_name)
pos += fprintf(stderr, "[=<n>]");
else
pos += fprintf(stderr, "[<n>]");
else
pos += fprintf(stderr, " <n>");
break;
case OPTION_CALLBACK:
if (opts->flags & PARSE_OPT_NOARG)
break;
/* FALLTHROUGH */
case OPTION_STRING:
if (opts->argh) {
if (opts->flags & PARSE_OPT_OPTARG)
if (opts->long_name)
pos += fprintf(stderr, "[=<%s>]", opts->argh);
else
pos += fprintf(stderr, "[<%s>]", opts->argh);
else
pos += fprintf(stderr, " <%s>", opts->argh);
} else {
if (opts->flags & PARSE_OPT_OPTARG)
if (opts->long_name)
pos += fprintf(stderr, "[=...]");
else
pos += fprintf(stderr, "[...]");
else
pos += fprintf(stderr, " ...");
}
break;
default: /* OPTION_{BIT,BOOLEAN,SET_UINT,SET_PTR} */
perf: Enable more compiler warnings Related to a shadowed variable bug fix Valdis Kletnieks noticed that perf does not get built with -Wshadow, which could have helped us avoid the bug. So enable -Wshadow and also enable the following warnings on perf builds, in addition to the already enabled -Wall -Wextra -std=gnu99 warnings: -Wcast-align -Wformat=2 -Wshadow -Winit-self -Wpacked -Wredundant-decls -Wstack-protector -Wstrict-aliasing=3 -Wswitch-default -Wswitch-enum -Wno-system-headers -Wundef -Wvolatile-register-var -Wwrite-strings -Wbad-function-cast -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wold-style-definition -Wstrict-prototypes -Wdeclaration-after-statement And change/fix the perf code to build cleanly under GCC 4.3.2. The list of warnings enablement is rather arbitrary: it's based on my (quick) reading of the GCC manpages and trying them on perf. I categorized the warnings based on individually enabling them and looking whether they trigger something in the perf build. If i liked those warnings (i.e. if they trigger for something that arguably could be improved) i enabled the warning. If the warnings seemed to come from language laywers spamming the build with tons of nuisance warnings i generally kept them off. Most of the sign conversion related warnings were in this category. (A second patch enabling some of the sign warnings might be welcome - sign bugs can be nasty.) I also kept warnings that seem to make sense from their manpage description and which produced no actual warnings on our code base. These warnings might still be turned off if they end up being a nuisance. I also left out a few warnings that are not supported in older compilers. [ Note that these changes might break the build on older compilers i did not test, or on non-x86 architectures that produce different warnings, so more testing would be welcome. ] Reported-by: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-08-15 18:26:57 +08:00
case OPTION_END:
case OPTION_GROUP:
case OPTION_BIT:
case OPTION_BOOLEAN:
perf: Fix endianness argument compatibility with OPT_BOOLEAN() and introduce OPT_INCR() Parsing an option from the command line with OPT_BOOLEAN on a bool data type would not work on a big-endian machine due to the manner in which the boolean was being cast into an int and incremented. For example, running 'perf probe --list' on a PowerPC machine would fail to properly set the list_events bool and would therefore print out the usage information and terminate. This patch makes OPT_BOOLEAN work as expected with a bool datatype. For cases where the original OPT_BOOLEAN was intentionally being used to increment an int each time it was passed in on the command line, this patch introduces OPT_INCR with the old behaviour of OPT_BOOLEAN (the verbose variable is currently the only such example of this). I have reviewed every use of OPT_BOOLEAN to verify that a true C99 bool was passed. Where integers were used, I verified that they were only being used for boolean logic and changed them to bools to ensure that they would not be mistakenly used as ints. The major exception was the verbose variable which now uses OPT_INCR instead of OPT_BOOLEAN. Signed-off-by: Ian Munsie <imunsie@au.ibm.com> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # NOTE: wont apply to .3[34].x cleanly, please backport Cc: Git development list <git@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Ian Munsie <imunsie@au1.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Eric B Munson <ebmunson@us.ibm.com> Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: WANG Cong <amwang@redhat.com> Cc: Thiago Farina <tfransosi@gmail.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com> Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com> Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> LKML-Reference: <1271147857-11604-1-git-send-email-imunsie@au.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-04-13 16:37:33 +08:00
case OPTION_INCR:
case OPTION_SET_UINT:
perf: Enable more compiler warnings Related to a shadowed variable bug fix Valdis Kletnieks noticed that perf does not get built with -Wshadow, which could have helped us avoid the bug. So enable -Wshadow and also enable the following warnings on perf builds, in addition to the already enabled -Wall -Wextra -std=gnu99 warnings: -Wcast-align -Wformat=2 -Wshadow -Winit-self -Wpacked -Wredundant-decls -Wstack-protector -Wstrict-aliasing=3 -Wswitch-default -Wswitch-enum -Wno-system-headers -Wundef -Wvolatile-register-var -Wwrite-strings -Wbad-function-cast -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wold-style-definition -Wstrict-prototypes -Wdeclaration-after-statement And change/fix the perf code to build cleanly under GCC 4.3.2. The list of warnings enablement is rather arbitrary: it's based on my (quick) reading of the GCC manpages and trying them on perf. I categorized the warnings based on individually enabling them and looking whether they trigger something in the perf build. If i liked those warnings (i.e. if they trigger for something that arguably could be improved) i enabled the warning. If the warnings seemed to come from language laywers spamming the build with tons of nuisance warnings i generally kept them off. Most of the sign conversion related warnings were in this category. (A second patch enabling some of the sign warnings might be welcome - sign bugs can be nasty.) I also kept warnings that seem to make sense from their manpage description and which produced no actual warnings on our code base. These warnings might still be turned off if they end up being a nuisance. I also left out a few warnings that are not supported in older compilers. [ Note that these changes might break the build on older compilers i did not test, or on non-x86 architectures that produce different warnings, so more testing would be welcome. ] Reported-by: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-08-15 18:26:57 +08:00
case OPTION_SET_PTR:
break;
}
if (pos <= USAGE_OPTS_WIDTH)
pad = USAGE_OPTS_WIDTH - pos;
else {
fputc('\n', stderr);
pad = USAGE_OPTS_WIDTH;
}
fprintf(stderr, "%*s%s\n", pad + USAGE_GAP, "", opts->help);
}
fputc('\n', stderr);
return PARSE_OPT_HELP;
}
void usage_with_options(const char * const *usagestr,
const struct option *opts)
{
exit_browser(false);
usage_with_options_internal(usagestr, opts, 0);
exit(129);
}
int parse_options_usage(const char * const *usagestr,
const struct option *opts)
{
return usage_with_options_internal(usagestr, opts, 0);
}
perf tools: Use __maybe_used for unused variables perf defines both __used and __unused variables to use for marking unused variables. The variable __used is defined to __attribute__((__unused__)), which contradicts the kernel definition to __attribute__((__used__)) for new gcc versions. On Android, __used is also defined in system headers and this leads to warnings like: warning: '__used__' attribute ignored __unused is not defined in the kernel and is not a standard definition. If __unused is included everywhere instead of __used, this leads to conflicts with glibc headers, since glibc has a variables with this name in its headers. The best approach is to use __maybe_unused, the definition used in the kernel for __attribute__((unused)). In this way there is only one definition in perf sources (instead of 2 definitions that point to the same thing: __used and __unused) and it works on both Linux and Android. This patch simply replaces all instances of __used and __unused with __maybe_unused. Signed-off-by: Irina Tirdea <irina.tirdea@intel.com> Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1347315303-29906-7-git-send-email-irina.tirdea@intel.com [ committer note: fixed up conflict with a116e05 in builtin-sched.c ] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2012-09-11 06:15:03 +08:00
int parse_opt_verbosity_cb(const struct option *opt,
const char *arg __maybe_unused,
int unset)
{
int *target = opt->value;
if (unset)
/* --no-quiet, --no-verbose */
*target = 0;
else if (opt->short_name == 'v') {
if (*target >= 0)
(*target)++;
else
*target = 1;
} else {
if (*target <= 0)
(*target)--;
else
*target = -1;
}
return 0;
}