linux_old1/drivers/pci/setup-res.c

297 lines
6.9 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* drivers/pci/setup-res.c
*
* Extruded from code written by
* Dave Rusling (david.rusling@reo.mts.dec.com)
* David Mosberger (davidm@cs.arizona.edu)
* David Miller (davem@redhat.com)
*
* Support routines for initializing a PCI subsystem.
*/
/* fixed for multiple pci buses, 1999 Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de> */
/*
* Nov 2000, Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
* Resource sorting
*/
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/ioport.h>
#include <linux/cache.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include "pci.h"
void pci_update_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno)
{
struct pci_bus_region region;
u32 new, check, mask;
int reg;
enum pci_bar_type type;
struct resource *res = dev->resource + resno;
/*
* Ignore resources for unimplemented BARs and unused resource slots
* for 64 bit BARs.
*/
if (!res->flags)
return;
/*
* Ignore non-moveable resources. This might be legacy resources for
* which no functional BAR register exists or another important
* system resource we shouldn't move around.
*/
if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED)
return;
pcibios_resource_to_bus(dev, &region, res);
new = region.start | (res->flags & PCI_REGION_FLAG_MASK);
if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO)
mask = (u32)PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_IO_MASK;
else
mask = (u32)PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK;
reg = pci_resource_bar(dev, resno, &type);
if (!reg)
return;
if (type != pci_bar_unknown) {
if (!(res->flags & IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE))
return;
new |= PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE;
}
pci_write_config_dword(dev, reg, new);
pci_read_config_dword(dev, reg, &check);
if ((new ^ check) & mask) {
dev_err(&dev->dev, "BAR %d: error updating (%#08x != %#08x)\n",
resno, new, check);
}
if ((new & (PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE|PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_MASK)) ==
(PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY|PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64)) {
new = region.start >> 16 >> 16;
pci_write_config_dword(dev, reg + 4, new);
pci_read_config_dword(dev, reg + 4, &check);
if (check != new) {
dev_err(&dev->dev, "BAR %d: error updating "
"(high %#08x != %#08x)\n", resno, new, check);
}
}
res->flags &= ~IORESOURCE_UNSET;
dev_info(&dev->dev, "BAR %d: set to %pR (PCI address [%#llx-%#llx]\n",
resno, res, (unsigned long long)region.start,
(unsigned long long)region.end);
}
pci: do not mark exported functions as __devinit Functions marked __devinit will be removed after kernel init. But being exported they are potentially called by a module much later. So the safer choice seems to be to keep the function even in the non CONFIG_HOTPLUG case. This silence the follwoing section mismatch warnings: WARNING: drivers/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:pci_bus_add_device from __ksymtab_gpl between '__ksymtab_pci_bus_add_device' (at offset 0x20) and '__ksymtab_pci_walk_bus' WARNING: drivers/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:pci_create_bus from __ksymtab_gpl between '__ksymtab_pci_create_bus' (at offset 0x40) and '__ksymtab_pci_stop_bus_device' WARNING: drivers/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:pci_bus_max_busnr from __ksymtab_gpl between '__ksymtab_pci_bus_max_busnr' (at offset 0xc0) and '__ksymtab_pci_assign_resource_fixed' WARNING: drivers/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:pci_claim_resource from __ksymtab_gpl between '__ksymtab_pci_claim_resource' (at offset 0xe0) and '__ksymtab_pcie_port_bus_type' WARNING: drivers/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:pci_bus_add_devices from __ksymtab between '__ksymtab_pci_bus_add_devices' (at offset 0x70) and '__ksymtab_pci_bus_alloc_resource' WARNING: drivers/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:pci_scan_bus_parented from __ksymtab between '__ksymtab_pci_scan_bus_parented' (at offset 0x90) and '__ksymtab_pci_root_buses' WARNING: drivers/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:pci_bus_assign_resources from __ksymtab between '__ksymtab_pci_bus_assign_resources' (at offset 0x4d0) and '__ksymtab_pci_bus_size_bridges' WARNING: drivers/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:pci_bus_size_bridges from __ksymtab between '__ksymtab_pci_bus_size_bridges' (at offset 0x4e0) and '__ksymtab_pci_setup_cardbus' Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2007-03-27 13:53:30 +08:00
int pci_claim_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int resource)
{
struct resource *res = &dev->resource[resource];
struct resource *root;
int err;
root = pci_find_parent_resource(dev, res);
if (!root) {
dev_err(&dev->dev, "no compatible bridge window for %pR\n",
res);
return -EINVAL;
}
err = request_resource(root, res);
if (err)
dev_err(&dev->dev,
"address space collision: %pR already in use\n", res);
return err;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_claim_resource);
2009-03-16 16:13:39 +08:00
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_QUIRKS
void pci_disable_bridge_window(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
dev_info(&dev->dev, "disabling bridge mem windows\n");
2009-03-16 16:13:39 +08:00
/* MMIO Base/Limit */
pci_write_config_dword(dev, PCI_MEMORY_BASE, 0x0000fff0);
/* Prefetchable MMIO Base/Limit */
pci_write_config_dword(dev, PCI_PREF_LIMIT_UPPER32, 0);
pci_write_config_dword(dev, PCI_PREF_MEMORY_BASE, 0x0000fff0);
pci_write_config_dword(dev, PCI_PREF_BASE_UPPER32, 0xffffffff);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_QUIRKS */
static int __pci_assign_resource(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *dev,
int resno)
{
struct resource *res = dev->resource + resno;
resource_size_t size, min, align;
int ret;
size = resource_size(res);
min = (res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) ? PCIBIOS_MIN_IO : PCIBIOS_MIN_MEM;
PCI SR-IOV: correct broken resource alignment calculations An SR-IOV capable device includes an SR-IOV PCIe capability which describes the Virtual Function (VF) BAR requirements. A typical SR-IOV device can support multiple VFs whose BARs must be in a contiguous region, effectively an array of VF BARs. The BAR reports the size requirement for a single VF. We calculate the full range needed by simply multiplying the VF BAR size with the number of possible VFs and create a resource spanning the full range. This all seems sane enough except it artificially inflates the alignment requirement for the VF BAR. The VF BAR need only be aligned to the size of a single BAR not the contiguous range of VF BARs. This can cause us to fail to allocate resources for the BAR despite the fact that we actually have enough space. This patch adds a thin PCI specific layer over the generic resource_alignment() function which is aware of the special nature of VF BARs and does sorting and allocation based on the smaller alignment requirement. I recognize that while resource_alignment is generic, it's basically a PCI helper. An alternative to this patch is to add PCI VF BAR specific information to struct resource. I opted for the extra layer rather than adding such PCI specific information to struct resource. This does have the slight downside that we don't cache the BAR size and re-read for each alignment query (happens a small handful of times during boot for each VF BAR). Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> Cc: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@intel.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2009-08-29 04:00:06 +08:00
align = pci_resource_alignment(dev, res);
/* First, try exact prefetching match.. */
ret = pci_bus_alloc_resource(bus, res, size, align, min,
IORESOURCE_PREFETCH,
pcibios_align_resource, dev);
if (ret < 0 && (res->flags & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH)) {
/*
* That failed.
*
* But a prefetching area can handle a non-prefetching
* window (it will just not perform as well).
*/
ret = pci_bus_alloc_resource(bus, res, size, align, min, 0,
pcibios_align_resource, dev);
}
if (!ret) {
PCI: clean up resource alignment management Done per Linus' request and suggestions. Linus has explained that better than I'll be able to explain: On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:12:10AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Actually, before we go any further, there might be a less intrusive > alternative: add just a couple of flags to the resource flags field (we > still have something like 8 unused bits on 32-bit), and use those to > implement a generic "resource_alignment()" routine. > > Two flags would do it: > > - IORESOURCE_SIZEALIGN: size indicates alignment (regular PCI device > resources) > > - IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN: start field is alignment (PCI bus resources > during probing) > > and then the case of both flags zero (or both bits set) would actually be > "invalid", and we would also clear the IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN flag when we > actually allocate the resource (so that we don't use the "start" field as > alignment incorrectly when it no longer indicates alignment). > > That wouldn't be totally generic, but it would have the nice property of > automatically at least add sanity checking for that whole "res->start has > the odd meaning of 'alignment' during probing" and remove the need for a > new field, and it would allow us to have a generic "resource_alignment()" > routine that just gets a resource pointer. Besides, I removed IORESOURCE_BUS_HAS_VGA flag which was unused for ages. Signed-off-by: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2008-03-30 23:50:14 +08:00
res->flags &= ~IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN;
dev_info(&dev->dev, "BAR %d: assigned %pR\n", resno, res);
PCI: clean up resource alignment management Done per Linus' request and suggestions. Linus has explained that better than I'll be able to explain: On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:12:10AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Actually, before we go any further, there might be a less intrusive > alternative: add just a couple of flags to the resource flags field (we > still have something like 8 unused bits on 32-bit), and use those to > implement a generic "resource_alignment()" routine. > > Two flags would do it: > > - IORESOURCE_SIZEALIGN: size indicates alignment (regular PCI device > resources) > > - IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN: start field is alignment (PCI bus resources > during probing) > > and then the case of both flags zero (or both bits set) would actually be > "invalid", and we would also clear the IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN flag when we > actually allocate the resource (so that we don't use the "start" field as > alignment incorrectly when it no longer indicates alignment). > > That wouldn't be totally generic, but it would have the nice property of > automatically at least add sanity checking for that whole "res->start has > the odd meaning of 'alignment' during probing" and remove the need for a > new field, and it would allow us to have a generic "resource_alignment()" > routine that just gets a resource pointer. Besides, I removed IORESOURCE_BUS_HAS_VGA flag which was unused for ages. Signed-off-by: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2008-03-30 23:50:14 +08:00
if (resno < PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES)
pci_update_resource(dev, resno);
}
return ret;
}
int pci_assign_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno)
{
struct resource *res = dev->resource + resno;
resource_size_t align;
struct pci_bus *bus;
int ret;
char *type;
PCI SR-IOV: correct broken resource alignment calculations An SR-IOV capable device includes an SR-IOV PCIe capability which describes the Virtual Function (VF) BAR requirements. A typical SR-IOV device can support multiple VFs whose BARs must be in a contiguous region, effectively an array of VF BARs. The BAR reports the size requirement for a single VF. We calculate the full range needed by simply multiplying the VF BAR size with the number of possible VFs and create a resource spanning the full range. This all seems sane enough except it artificially inflates the alignment requirement for the VF BAR. The VF BAR need only be aligned to the size of a single BAR not the contiguous range of VF BARs. This can cause us to fail to allocate resources for the BAR despite the fact that we actually have enough space. This patch adds a thin PCI specific layer over the generic resource_alignment() function which is aware of the special nature of VF BARs and does sorting and allocation based on the smaller alignment requirement. I recognize that while resource_alignment is generic, it's basically a PCI helper. An alternative to this patch is to add PCI VF BAR specific information to struct resource. I opted for the extra layer rather than adding such PCI specific information to struct resource. This does have the slight downside that we don't cache the BAR size and re-read for each alignment query (happens a small handful of times during boot for each VF BAR). Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> Cc: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@intel.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2009-08-29 04:00:06 +08:00
align = pci_resource_alignment(dev, res);
if (!align) {
dev_info(&dev->dev, "BAR %d: can't assign %pR "
"(bogus alignment)\n", resno, res);
return -EINVAL;
}
bus = dev->bus;
while ((ret = __pci_assign_resource(bus, dev, resno))) {
if (bus->parent && bus->self->transparent)
bus = bus->parent;
else
bus = NULL;
if (bus)
continue;
break;
}
if (ret) {
if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM)
if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH)
type = "mem pref";
else
type = "mem";
else if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO)
type = "io";
else
type = "unknown";
dev_info(&dev->dev,
"BAR %d: can't assign %s (size %#llx)\n",
resno, type, (unsigned long long) resource_size(res));
}
return ret;
}
/* Sort resources by alignment */
pci: do not mark exported functions as __devinit Functions marked __devinit will be removed after kernel init. But being exported they are potentially called by a module much later. So the safer choice seems to be to keep the function even in the non CONFIG_HOTPLUG case. This silence the follwoing section mismatch warnings: WARNING: drivers/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:pci_bus_add_device from __ksymtab_gpl between '__ksymtab_pci_bus_add_device' (at offset 0x20) and '__ksymtab_pci_walk_bus' WARNING: drivers/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:pci_create_bus from __ksymtab_gpl between '__ksymtab_pci_create_bus' (at offset 0x40) and '__ksymtab_pci_stop_bus_device' WARNING: drivers/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:pci_bus_max_busnr from __ksymtab_gpl between '__ksymtab_pci_bus_max_busnr' (at offset 0xc0) and '__ksymtab_pci_assign_resource_fixed' WARNING: drivers/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:pci_claim_resource from __ksymtab_gpl between '__ksymtab_pci_claim_resource' (at offset 0xe0) and '__ksymtab_pcie_port_bus_type' WARNING: drivers/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:pci_bus_add_devices from __ksymtab between '__ksymtab_pci_bus_add_devices' (at offset 0x70) and '__ksymtab_pci_bus_alloc_resource' WARNING: drivers/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:pci_scan_bus_parented from __ksymtab between '__ksymtab_pci_scan_bus_parented' (at offset 0x90) and '__ksymtab_pci_root_buses' WARNING: drivers/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:pci_bus_assign_resources from __ksymtab between '__ksymtab_pci_bus_assign_resources' (at offset 0x4d0) and '__ksymtab_pci_bus_size_bridges' WARNING: drivers/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:pci_bus_size_bridges from __ksymtab between '__ksymtab_pci_bus_size_bridges' (at offset 0x4e0) and '__ksymtab_pci_setup_cardbus' Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2007-03-27 13:53:30 +08:00
void pdev_sort_resources(struct pci_dev *dev, struct resource_list *head)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < PCI_NUM_RESOURCES; i++) {
struct resource *r;
struct resource_list *list, *tmp;
resource_size_t r_align;
r = &dev->resource[i];
if (r->flags & IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED)
continue;
if (!(r->flags) || r->parent)
continue;
PCI: clean up resource alignment management Done per Linus' request and suggestions. Linus has explained that better than I'll be able to explain: On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:12:10AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Actually, before we go any further, there might be a less intrusive > alternative: add just a couple of flags to the resource flags field (we > still have something like 8 unused bits on 32-bit), and use those to > implement a generic "resource_alignment()" routine. > > Two flags would do it: > > - IORESOURCE_SIZEALIGN: size indicates alignment (regular PCI device > resources) > > - IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN: start field is alignment (PCI bus resources > during probing) > > and then the case of both flags zero (or both bits set) would actually be > "invalid", and we would also clear the IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN flag when we > actually allocate the resource (so that we don't use the "start" field as > alignment incorrectly when it no longer indicates alignment). > > That wouldn't be totally generic, but it would have the nice property of > automatically at least add sanity checking for that whole "res->start has > the odd meaning of 'alignment' during probing" and remove the need for a > new field, and it would allow us to have a generic "resource_alignment()" > routine that just gets a resource pointer. Besides, I removed IORESOURCE_BUS_HAS_VGA flag which was unused for ages. Signed-off-by: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2008-03-30 23:50:14 +08:00
PCI SR-IOV: correct broken resource alignment calculations An SR-IOV capable device includes an SR-IOV PCIe capability which describes the Virtual Function (VF) BAR requirements. A typical SR-IOV device can support multiple VFs whose BARs must be in a contiguous region, effectively an array of VF BARs. The BAR reports the size requirement for a single VF. We calculate the full range needed by simply multiplying the VF BAR size with the number of possible VFs and create a resource spanning the full range. This all seems sane enough except it artificially inflates the alignment requirement for the VF BAR. The VF BAR need only be aligned to the size of a single BAR not the contiguous range of VF BARs. This can cause us to fail to allocate resources for the BAR despite the fact that we actually have enough space. This patch adds a thin PCI specific layer over the generic resource_alignment() function which is aware of the special nature of VF BARs and does sorting and allocation based on the smaller alignment requirement. I recognize that while resource_alignment is generic, it's basically a PCI helper. An alternative to this patch is to add PCI VF BAR specific information to struct resource. I opted for the extra layer rather than adding such PCI specific information to struct resource. This does have the slight downside that we don't cache the BAR size and re-read for each alignment query (happens a small handful of times during boot for each VF BAR). Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> Cc: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@intel.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2009-08-29 04:00:06 +08:00
r_align = pci_resource_alignment(dev, r);
if (!r_align) {
dev_warn(&dev->dev, "BAR %d: %pR has bogus alignment\n",
i, r);
continue;
}
for (list = head; ; list = list->next) {
resource_size_t align = 0;
struct resource_list *ln = list->next;
PCI: clean up resource alignment management Done per Linus' request and suggestions. Linus has explained that better than I'll be able to explain: On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:12:10AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Actually, before we go any further, there might be a less intrusive > alternative: add just a couple of flags to the resource flags field (we > still have something like 8 unused bits on 32-bit), and use those to > implement a generic "resource_alignment()" routine. > > Two flags would do it: > > - IORESOURCE_SIZEALIGN: size indicates alignment (regular PCI device > resources) > > - IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN: start field is alignment (PCI bus resources > during probing) > > and then the case of both flags zero (or both bits set) would actually be > "invalid", and we would also clear the IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN flag when we > actually allocate the resource (so that we don't use the "start" field as > alignment incorrectly when it no longer indicates alignment). > > That wouldn't be totally generic, but it would have the nice property of > automatically at least add sanity checking for that whole "res->start has > the odd meaning of 'alignment' during probing" and remove the need for a > new field, and it would allow us to have a generic "resource_alignment()" > routine that just gets a resource pointer. Besides, I removed IORESOURCE_BUS_HAS_VGA flag which was unused for ages. Signed-off-by: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2008-03-30 23:50:14 +08:00
if (ln)
PCI SR-IOV: correct broken resource alignment calculations An SR-IOV capable device includes an SR-IOV PCIe capability which describes the Virtual Function (VF) BAR requirements. A typical SR-IOV device can support multiple VFs whose BARs must be in a contiguous region, effectively an array of VF BARs. The BAR reports the size requirement for a single VF. We calculate the full range needed by simply multiplying the VF BAR size with the number of possible VFs and create a resource spanning the full range. This all seems sane enough except it artificially inflates the alignment requirement for the VF BAR. The VF BAR need only be aligned to the size of a single BAR not the contiguous range of VF BARs. This can cause us to fail to allocate resources for the BAR despite the fact that we actually have enough space. This patch adds a thin PCI specific layer over the generic resource_alignment() function which is aware of the special nature of VF BARs and does sorting and allocation based on the smaller alignment requirement. I recognize that while resource_alignment is generic, it's basically a PCI helper. An alternative to this patch is to add PCI VF BAR specific information to struct resource. I opted for the extra layer rather than adding such PCI specific information to struct resource. This does have the slight downside that we don't cache the BAR size and re-read for each alignment query (happens a small handful of times during boot for each VF BAR). Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> Cc: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@intel.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2009-08-29 04:00:06 +08:00
align = pci_resource_alignment(ln->dev, ln->res);
PCI: clean up resource alignment management Done per Linus' request and suggestions. Linus has explained that better than I'll be able to explain: On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:12:10AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Actually, before we go any further, there might be a less intrusive > alternative: add just a couple of flags to the resource flags field (we > still have something like 8 unused bits on 32-bit), and use those to > implement a generic "resource_alignment()" routine. > > Two flags would do it: > > - IORESOURCE_SIZEALIGN: size indicates alignment (regular PCI device > resources) > > - IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN: start field is alignment (PCI bus resources > during probing) > > and then the case of both flags zero (or both bits set) would actually be > "invalid", and we would also clear the IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN flag when we > actually allocate the resource (so that we don't use the "start" field as > alignment incorrectly when it no longer indicates alignment). > > That wouldn't be totally generic, but it would have the nice property of > automatically at least add sanity checking for that whole "res->start has > the odd meaning of 'alignment' during probing" and remove the need for a > new field, and it would allow us to have a generic "resource_alignment()" > routine that just gets a resource pointer. Besides, I removed IORESOURCE_BUS_HAS_VGA flag which was unused for ages. Signed-off-by: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2008-03-30 23:50:14 +08:00
if (r_align > align) {
tmp = kmalloc(sizeof(*tmp), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tmp)
panic("pdev_sort_resources(): "
"kmalloc() failed!\n");
tmp->next = ln;
tmp->res = r;
tmp->dev = dev;
list->next = tmp;
break;
}
}
}
}
int pci_enable_resources(struct pci_dev *dev, int mask)
{
u16 cmd, old_cmd;
int i;
struct resource *r;
pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &cmd);
old_cmd = cmd;
for (i = 0; i < PCI_NUM_RESOURCES; i++) {
if (!(mask & (1 << i)))
continue;
r = &dev->resource[i];
if (!(r->flags & (IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM)))
continue;
if ((i == PCI_ROM_RESOURCE) &&
(!(r->flags & IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE)))
continue;
if (!r->parent) {
dev_err(&dev->dev, "device not available "
"(can't reserve %pR)\n", r);
return -EINVAL;
}
if (r->flags & IORESOURCE_IO)
cmd |= PCI_COMMAND_IO;
if (r->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM)
cmd |= PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY;
}
if (cmd != old_cmd) {
dev_info(&dev->dev, "enabling device (%04x -> %04x)\n",
old_cmd, cmd);
pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, cmd);
}
return 0;
}