2019-11-25 04:59:58 +08:00
|
|
|
LIBNVDIMM Maintainer Entry Profile
|
|
|
|
|
==================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overview
|
|
|
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
|
The libnvdimm subsystem manages persistent memory across multiple
|
|
|
|
|
architectures. The mailing list, is tracked by patchwork here:
|
|
|
|
|
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-nvdimm/list/
|
|
|
|
|
...and that instance is configured to give feedback to submitters on
|
|
|
|
|
patch acceptance and upstream merge. Patches are merged to either the
|
|
|
|
|
'libnvdimm-fixes', or 'libnvdimm-for-next' branch. Those branches are
|
|
|
|
|
available here:
|
|
|
|
|
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nvdimm/nvdimm.git/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In general patches can be submitted against the latest -rc, however if
|
|
|
|
|
the incoming code change is dependent on other pending changes then the
|
|
|
|
|
patch should be based on the libnvdimm-for-next branch. However, since
|
|
|
|
|
persistent memory sits at the intersection of storage and memory there
|
|
|
|
|
are cases where patches are more suitable to be merged through a
|
|
|
|
|
Filesystem or the Memory Management tree. When in doubt copy the nvdimm
|
|
|
|
|
list and the maintainers will help route.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Submissions will be exposed to the kbuild robot for compile regression
|
|
|
|
|
testing. It helps to get a success notification from that infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
before submitting, but it is not required.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Submit Checklist Addendum
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
There are unit tests for the subsystem via the ndctl utility:
|
|
|
|
|
https://github.com/pmem/ndctl
|
|
|
|
|
Those tests need to be passed before the patches go upstream, but not
|
|
|
|
|
necessarily before initial posting. Contact the list if you need help
|
|
|
|
|
getting the test environment set up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-18 23:36:20 +08:00
|
|
|
ACPI Device Specific Methods (_DSM)
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
2019-11-25 04:59:58 +08:00
|
|
|
Before patches enabling for a new _DSM family will be considered it must
|
|
|
|
|
be assigned a format-interface-code from the NVDIMM Sub-team of the ACPI
|
|
|
|
|
Specification Working Group. In general, the stance of the subsystem is
|
|
|
|
|
to push back on the proliferation of NVDIMM command sets, do strongly
|
|
|
|
|
consider implementing support for an existing command set. See
|
|
|
|
|
drivers/acpi/nfit/nfit.h for the set of support command sets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key Cycle Dates
|
|
|
|
|
---------------
|
|
|
|
|
New submissions can be sent at any time, but if they intend to hit the
|
|
|
|
|
next merge window they should be sent before -rc4, and ideally
|
|
|
|
|
stabilized in the libnvdimm-for-next branch by -rc6. Of course if a
|
|
|
|
|
patch set requires more than 2 weeks of review -rc4 is already too late
|
|
|
|
|
and some patches may require multiple development cycles to review.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Cadence
|
|
|
|
|
--------------
|
|
|
|
|
In general, please wait up to one week before pinging for feedback. A
|
|
|
|
|
private mail reminder is preferred. Alternatively ask for other
|
|
|
|
|
developers that have Reviewed-by tags for libnvdimm changes to take a
|
|
|
|
|
look and offer their opinion.
|
