p71924506
/
linux_old1
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity
linux_old1/drivers/acpi/container.c

133 lines
3.3 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
/*
ACPI / container: Use common hotplug code Switch the ACPI container driver to using common device hotplug code introduced previously. This reduces the driver down to a trivial definition and registration of a struct acpi_scan_handler object. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Tested-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-03-04 06:05:55 +08:00
* container.c - ACPI Generic Container Driver
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
*
* Copyright (C) 2004 Anil S Keshavamurthy (anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com)
* Copyright (C) 2004 Keiichiro Tokunaga (tokunaga.keiich@jp.fujitsu.com)
* Copyright (C) 2004 Motoyuki Ito (motoyuki@soft.fujitsu.com)
* Copyright (C) 2004 FUJITSU LIMITED
ACPI / container: Use common hotplug code Switch the ACPI container driver to using common device hotplug code introduced previously. This reduces the driver down to a trivial definition and registration of a struct acpi_scan_handler object. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Tested-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-03-04 06:05:55 +08:00
* Copyright (C) 2004, 2013 Intel Corp.
* Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
*
* ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at
* your option) any later version.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
* WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
* General Public License for more details.
*
* ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*/
#include <linux/acpi.h>
ACPI / hotplug / driver core: Handle containers in a special way ACPI container devices require special hotplug handling, at least on some systems, since generally user space needs to carry out system-specific cleanup before it makes sense to offline devices in the container. However, the current ACPI hotplug code for containers first attempts to offline devices in the container and only then it notifies user space of the container offline. Moreover, after commit 202317a573b2 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace), ACPI device objects representing containers are present as long as the ACPI namespace nodes corresponding to them are present, which may be forever, even if the container devices are physically detached from the system (the return values of the corresponding _STA methods change in those cases, but generally the namespace nodes themselves are still there). Thus it is useful to introduce entities representing containers that will go away during container hot-unplug. The goal of this change is to address both the above issues. The idea is to create a "companion" container system device for each of the ACPI container device objects during the initial namespace scan or on a hotplug event making the container present. That system device will be unregistered on container removal. A new bus type for container devices is added for this purpose, because device offline and online operations need to be defined for them. The online operation is a trivial function that is always successful and the offline uses a callback pointed to by the container device's offline member. For ACPI containers that callback simply walks the list of ACPI device objects right below the container object (its children) and checks if all of their physical companion devices are offline. If that's not the case, it returns -EBUSY and the container system devivce cannot be put offline. Consequently, to put the container system device offline, it is necessary to put all of the physical devices depending on its ACPI companion object offline beforehand. Container system devices created for ACPI container objects are initially online. They are created by the container ACPI scan handler whose hotplug.demand_offline flag is set. That causes acpi_scan_hot_remove() to check if the companion container system device is offline before attempting to remove an ACPI container or any devices below it. If the check fails, a KOBJ_CHANGE uevent is emitted for the container system device in question and user space is expected to offline all devices below the container and the container itself in response to it. Then, user space can finalize the removal of the container with the help of its ACPI device object's eject attribute in sysfs. Tested-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2013-12-29 22:25:48 +08:00
#include <linux/container.h>
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
ACPI: suppress compiler warning in container.c This patch fixes following compiler warning when build via make W=1: drivers/acpi/container.c:183:116: warning: no previous prototype for ‘acpi_container_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-03-11 17:17:07 +08:00
#include "internal.h"
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
#define _COMPONENT ACPI_CONTAINER_COMPONENT
ACPI: clean up ACPI_MODULE_NAME() use cosmetic only Make "module name" actually match the file name. Invoke with ';' as leaving it off confuses Lindent and gcc doesn't care. Fix indentation where Lindent did get confused. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-02-13 11:42:12 +08:00
ACPI_MODULE_NAME("container");
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
ACPI: autoload modules - Create __mod_acpi_device_table symbol for all ACPI drivers modpost is going to use these to create e.g. acpi:ACPI0001 in modules.alias. Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-07-23 20:44:41 +08:00
static const struct acpi_device_id container_device_ids[] = {
{"ACPI0004", 0},
{"PNP0A05", 0},
{"PNP0A06", 0},
{"", 0},
};
ACPI / scan: always register container scan handler Prevent platform devices from being created for ACPI containers if CONFIG_ACPI_CONTAINER is unset by compiling out the container scan handler's callbacks only in that case and still compiling its device ID list in and registering the scan handler in either case. This change is based on a prototype from Zhang Rui. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2014-05-30 10:28:20 +08:00
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CONTAINER
ACPI / hotplug / driver core: Handle containers in a special way ACPI container devices require special hotplug handling, at least on some systems, since generally user space needs to carry out system-specific cleanup before it makes sense to offline devices in the container. However, the current ACPI hotplug code for containers first attempts to offline devices in the container and only then it notifies user space of the container offline. Moreover, after commit 202317a573b2 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace), ACPI device objects representing containers are present as long as the ACPI namespace nodes corresponding to them are present, which may be forever, even if the container devices are physically detached from the system (the return values of the corresponding _STA methods change in those cases, but generally the namespace nodes themselves are still there). Thus it is useful to introduce entities representing containers that will go away during container hot-unplug. The goal of this change is to address both the above issues. The idea is to create a "companion" container system device for each of the ACPI container device objects during the initial namespace scan or on a hotplug event making the container present. That system device will be unregistered on container removal. A new bus type for container devices is added for this purpose, because device offline and online operations need to be defined for them. The online operation is a trivial function that is always successful and the offline uses a callback pointed to by the container device's offline member. For ACPI containers that callback simply walks the list of ACPI device objects right below the container object (its children) and checks if all of their physical companion devices are offline. If that's not the case, it returns -EBUSY and the container system devivce cannot be put offline. Consequently, to put the container system device offline, it is necessary to put all of the physical devices depending on its ACPI companion object offline beforehand. Container system devices created for ACPI container objects are initially online. They are created by the container ACPI scan handler whose hotplug.demand_offline flag is set. That causes acpi_scan_hot_remove() to check if the companion container system device is offline before attempting to remove an ACPI container or any devices below it. If the check fails, a KOBJ_CHANGE uevent is emitted for the container system device in question and user space is expected to offline all devices below the container and the container itself in response to it. Then, user space can finalize the removal of the container with the help of its ACPI device object's eject attribute in sysfs. Tested-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2013-12-29 22:25:48 +08:00
static int acpi_container_offline(struct container_dev *cdev)
{
struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(&cdev->dev);
struct acpi_device *child;
/* Check all of the dependent devices' physical companions. */
list_for_each_entry(child, &adev->children, node)
if (!acpi_scan_is_offline(child, false))
return -EBUSY;
return 0;
}
static void acpi_container_release(struct device *dev)
{
kfree(to_container_dev(dev));
}
ACPI / hotplug: Move container-specific code out of the core Move container-specific uevents from the core hotplug code to the container scan handler's .attach() and .detach() callbacks. This way the core will not have to special-case containers and the uevents will be guaranteed to happen every time a container is either scanned or trimmed as appropriate. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2013-11-23 04:55:32 +08:00
static int container_device_attach(struct acpi_device *adev,
ACPI / scan: Make container driver use struct acpi_scan_handler Make the ACPI container driver use struct acpi_scan_handler for representing the object used to initialize ACPI containers and remove the ACPI driver structure used previously and the data structures created by it, since in fact they were not used for any purpose. This simplifies the code and reduces the kernel's memory footprint by avoiding the registration of a struct device_driver object with the driver core and creation of its sysfs directory which is unnecessary. In addition to that, make the namespace walk callback used for installing the notify handlers for ACPI containers more straightforward. This change includes fixes from Toshi Kani. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Tested-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-02-09 06:52:39 +08:00
const struct acpi_device_id *not_used)
{
ACPI / hotplug / driver core: Handle containers in a special way ACPI container devices require special hotplug handling, at least on some systems, since generally user space needs to carry out system-specific cleanup before it makes sense to offline devices in the container. However, the current ACPI hotplug code for containers first attempts to offline devices in the container and only then it notifies user space of the container offline. Moreover, after commit 202317a573b2 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace), ACPI device objects representing containers are present as long as the ACPI namespace nodes corresponding to them are present, which may be forever, even if the container devices are physically detached from the system (the return values of the corresponding _STA methods change in those cases, but generally the namespace nodes themselves are still there). Thus it is useful to introduce entities representing containers that will go away during container hot-unplug. The goal of this change is to address both the above issues. The idea is to create a "companion" container system device for each of the ACPI container device objects during the initial namespace scan or on a hotplug event making the container present. That system device will be unregistered on container removal. A new bus type for container devices is added for this purpose, because device offline and online operations need to be defined for them. The online operation is a trivial function that is always successful and the offline uses a callback pointed to by the container device's offline member. For ACPI containers that callback simply walks the list of ACPI device objects right below the container object (its children) and checks if all of their physical companion devices are offline. If that's not the case, it returns -EBUSY and the container system devivce cannot be put offline. Consequently, to put the container system device offline, it is necessary to put all of the physical devices depending on its ACPI companion object offline beforehand. Container system devices created for ACPI container objects are initially online. They are created by the container ACPI scan handler whose hotplug.demand_offline flag is set. That causes acpi_scan_hot_remove() to check if the companion container system device is offline before attempting to remove an ACPI container or any devices below it. If the check fails, a KOBJ_CHANGE uevent is emitted for the container system device in question and user space is expected to offline all devices below the container and the container itself in response to it. Then, user space can finalize the removal of the container with the help of its ACPI device object's eject attribute in sysfs. Tested-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2013-12-29 22:25:48 +08:00
struct container_dev *cdev;
struct device *dev;
int ret;
ACPI / dock: Dispatch dock notifications from the global notify handler The ACPI dock station code carries out an extra namespace scan before the main one in order to find and register all of the dock device objects. Then, it registers a notify handler for each of them for handling dock events. However, dock device objects need not be scanned for upfront. They very well can be enumerated and registered during the first phase of the main namespace scan, before attaching scan handlers and ACPI drivers to ACPI device objects. Then, the dependent devices can be added to the in the second phase. That makes it possible to drop the extra namespace scan, so do it. Moreover, it is not necessary to register notify handlers for all of the dock stations' namespace nodes, becuase notifications may be dispatched from the global notify handler for them. Do that and drop two functions used for dock notify handling, acpi_dock_deferred_cb() and dock_notify_handler(), that aren't necessary any more. Finally, some dock station objects have _HID objects matching the ACPI container scan handler which causes it to claim those objects and try to handle their hotplug, but that is not a good idea, because those objects have their own special hotplug handling anyway. For this reason, the hotplug_notify flag should not be set for ACPI device objects representing dock stations and the container scan handler should be made ignore those objects, so make that happen. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-02-16 08:51:01 +08:00
if (adev->flags.is_dock_station)
return 0;
ACPI / hotplug / driver core: Handle containers in a special way ACPI container devices require special hotplug handling, at least on some systems, since generally user space needs to carry out system-specific cleanup before it makes sense to offline devices in the container. However, the current ACPI hotplug code for containers first attempts to offline devices in the container and only then it notifies user space of the container offline. Moreover, after commit 202317a573b2 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace), ACPI device objects representing containers are present as long as the ACPI namespace nodes corresponding to them are present, which may be forever, even if the container devices are physically detached from the system (the return values of the corresponding _STA methods change in those cases, but generally the namespace nodes themselves are still there). Thus it is useful to introduce entities representing containers that will go away during container hot-unplug. The goal of this change is to address both the above issues. The idea is to create a "companion" container system device for each of the ACPI container device objects during the initial namespace scan or on a hotplug event making the container present. That system device will be unregistered on container removal. A new bus type for container devices is added for this purpose, because device offline and online operations need to be defined for them. The online operation is a trivial function that is always successful and the offline uses a callback pointed to by the container device's offline member. For ACPI containers that callback simply walks the list of ACPI device objects right below the container object (its children) and checks if all of their physical companion devices are offline. If that's not the case, it returns -EBUSY and the container system devivce cannot be put offline. Consequently, to put the container system device offline, it is necessary to put all of the physical devices depending on its ACPI companion object offline beforehand. Container system devices created for ACPI container objects are initially online. They are created by the container ACPI scan handler whose hotplug.demand_offline flag is set. That causes acpi_scan_hot_remove() to check if the companion container system device is offline before attempting to remove an ACPI container or any devices below it. If the check fails, a KOBJ_CHANGE uevent is emitted for the container system device in question and user space is expected to offline all devices below the container and the container itself in response to it. Then, user space can finalize the removal of the container with the help of its ACPI device object's eject attribute in sysfs. Tested-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2013-12-29 22:25:48 +08:00
cdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*cdev), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!cdev)
return -ENOMEM;
cdev->offline = acpi_container_offline;
dev = &cdev->dev;
dev->bus = &container_subsys;
dev_set_name(dev, "%s", dev_name(&adev->dev));
ACPI_COMPANION_SET(dev, adev);
dev->release = acpi_container_release;
ret = device_register(dev);
ACPI / container: Fix error code path in container_device_attach() To avoid leaking memory on errors from device_register(), do a put_device() on the device object in question in the error code path of container_device_attach(). Fixes: caa73ea158de (ACPI / hotplug / driver core: Handle containers in a special way) Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
2014-02-12 07:52:49 +08:00
if (ret) {
put_device(dev);
ACPI / hotplug / driver core: Handle containers in a special way ACPI container devices require special hotplug handling, at least on some systems, since generally user space needs to carry out system-specific cleanup before it makes sense to offline devices in the container. However, the current ACPI hotplug code for containers first attempts to offline devices in the container and only then it notifies user space of the container offline. Moreover, after commit 202317a573b2 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace), ACPI device objects representing containers are present as long as the ACPI namespace nodes corresponding to them are present, which may be forever, even if the container devices are physically detached from the system (the return values of the corresponding _STA methods change in those cases, but generally the namespace nodes themselves are still there). Thus it is useful to introduce entities representing containers that will go away during container hot-unplug. The goal of this change is to address both the above issues. The idea is to create a "companion" container system device for each of the ACPI container device objects during the initial namespace scan or on a hotplug event making the container present. That system device will be unregistered on container removal. A new bus type for container devices is added for this purpose, because device offline and online operations need to be defined for them. The online operation is a trivial function that is always successful and the offline uses a callback pointed to by the container device's offline member. For ACPI containers that callback simply walks the list of ACPI device objects right below the container object (its children) and checks if all of their physical companion devices are offline. If that's not the case, it returns -EBUSY and the container system devivce cannot be put offline. Consequently, to put the container system device offline, it is necessary to put all of the physical devices depending on its ACPI companion object offline beforehand. Container system devices created for ACPI container objects are initially online. They are created by the container ACPI scan handler whose hotplug.demand_offline flag is set. That causes acpi_scan_hot_remove() to check if the companion container system device is offline before attempting to remove an ACPI container or any devices below it. If the check fails, a KOBJ_CHANGE uevent is emitted for the container system device in question and user space is expected to offline all devices below the container and the container itself in response to it. Then, user space can finalize the removal of the container with the help of its ACPI device object's eject attribute in sysfs. Tested-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2013-12-29 22:25:48 +08:00
return ret;
ACPI / container: Fix error code path in container_device_attach() To avoid leaking memory on errors from device_register(), do a put_device() on the device object in question in the error code path of container_device_attach(). Fixes: caa73ea158de (ACPI / hotplug / driver core: Handle containers in a special way) Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
2014-02-12 07:52:49 +08:00
}
ACPI / hotplug / driver core: Handle containers in a special way ACPI container devices require special hotplug handling, at least on some systems, since generally user space needs to carry out system-specific cleanup before it makes sense to offline devices in the container. However, the current ACPI hotplug code for containers first attempts to offline devices in the container and only then it notifies user space of the container offline. Moreover, after commit 202317a573b2 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace), ACPI device objects representing containers are present as long as the ACPI namespace nodes corresponding to them are present, which may be forever, even if the container devices are physically detached from the system (the return values of the corresponding _STA methods change in those cases, but generally the namespace nodes themselves are still there). Thus it is useful to introduce entities representing containers that will go away during container hot-unplug. The goal of this change is to address both the above issues. The idea is to create a "companion" container system device for each of the ACPI container device objects during the initial namespace scan or on a hotplug event making the container present. That system device will be unregistered on container removal. A new bus type for container devices is added for this purpose, because device offline and online operations need to be defined for them. The online operation is a trivial function that is always successful and the offline uses a callback pointed to by the container device's offline member. For ACPI containers that callback simply walks the list of ACPI device objects right below the container object (its children) and checks if all of their physical companion devices are offline. If that's not the case, it returns -EBUSY and the container system devivce cannot be put offline. Consequently, to put the container system device offline, it is necessary to put all of the physical devices depending on its ACPI companion object offline beforehand. Container system devices created for ACPI container objects are initially online. They are created by the container ACPI scan handler whose hotplug.demand_offline flag is set. That causes acpi_scan_hot_remove() to check if the companion container system device is offline before attempting to remove an ACPI container or any devices below it. If the check fails, a KOBJ_CHANGE uevent is emitted for the container system device in question and user space is expected to offline all devices below the container and the container itself in response to it. Then, user space can finalize the removal of the container with the help of its ACPI device object's eject attribute in sysfs. Tested-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2013-12-29 22:25:48 +08:00
adev->driver_data = dev;
ACPI / scan: Make container driver use struct acpi_scan_handler Make the ACPI container driver use struct acpi_scan_handler for representing the object used to initialize ACPI containers and remove the ACPI driver structure used previously and the data structures created by it, since in fact they were not used for any purpose. This simplifies the code and reduces the kernel's memory footprint by avoiding the registration of a struct device_driver object with the driver core and creation of its sysfs directory which is unnecessary. In addition to that, make the namespace walk callback used for installing the notify handlers for ACPI containers more straightforward. This change includes fixes from Toshi Kani. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Tested-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-02-09 06:52:39 +08:00
return 1;
}
ACPI / hotplug: Move container-specific code out of the core Move container-specific uevents from the core hotplug code to the container scan handler's .attach() and .detach() callbacks. This way the core will not have to special-case containers and the uevents will be guaranteed to happen every time a container is either scanned or trimmed as appropriate. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2013-11-23 04:55:32 +08:00
static void container_device_detach(struct acpi_device *adev)
{
ACPI / hotplug / driver core: Handle containers in a special way ACPI container devices require special hotplug handling, at least on some systems, since generally user space needs to carry out system-specific cleanup before it makes sense to offline devices in the container. However, the current ACPI hotplug code for containers first attempts to offline devices in the container and only then it notifies user space of the container offline. Moreover, after commit 202317a573b2 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace), ACPI device objects representing containers are present as long as the ACPI namespace nodes corresponding to them are present, which may be forever, even if the container devices are physically detached from the system (the return values of the corresponding _STA methods change in those cases, but generally the namespace nodes themselves are still there). Thus it is useful to introduce entities representing containers that will go away during container hot-unplug. The goal of this change is to address both the above issues. The idea is to create a "companion" container system device for each of the ACPI container device objects during the initial namespace scan or on a hotplug event making the container present. That system device will be unregistered on container removal. A new bus type for container devices is added for this purpose, because device offline and online operations need to be defined for them. The online operation is a trivial function that is always successful and the offline uses a callback pointed to by the container device's offline member. For ACPI containers that callback simply walks the list of ACPI device objects right below the container object (its children) and checks if all of their physical companion devices are offline. If that's not the case, it returns -EBUSY and the container system devivce cannot be put offline. Consequently, to put the container system device offline, it is necessary to put all of the physical devices depending on its ACPI companion object offline beforehand. Container system devices created for ACPI container objects are initially online. They are created by the container ACPI scan handler whose hotplug.demand_offline flag is set. That causes acpi_scan_hot_remove() to check if the companion container system device is offline before attempting to remove an ACPI container or any devices below it. If the check fails, a KOBJ_CHANGE uevent is emitted for the container system device in question and user space is expected to offline all devices below the container and the container itself in response to it. Then, user space can finalize the removal of the container with the help of its ACPI device object's eject attribute in sysfs. Tested-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2013-12-29 22:25:48 +08:00
struct device *dev = acpi_driver_data(adev);
adev->driver_data = NULL;
if (dev)
device_unregister(dev);
ACPI / hotplug: Move container-specific code out of the core Move container-specific uevents from the core hotplug code to the container scan handler's .attach() and .detach() callbacks. This way the core will not have to special-case containers and the uevents will be guaranteed to happen every time a container is either scanned or trimmed as appropriate. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2013-11-23 04:55:32 +08:00
}
ACPI / hotplug: Generate online uevents for ACPI containers Commit 46394fd01 (ACPI / hotplug: Move container-specific code out of the core) removed the generation of "online" uevents for containers, because "add" uevents are now generated for them automatically when container system devices are registered. However, there are user space tools that need to be notified when the container and all of its children have been enumerated, which doesn't happen any more. For this reason, add a mechanism allowing "online" uevents to be generated for ACPI containers after enumerating the container along with all of its children. Fixes: 46394fd01 (ACPI / hotplug: Move container-specific code out of the core) Reported-and-tested-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: 3.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-09-21 08:58:18 +08:00
static void container_device_online(struct acpi_device *adev)
{
struct device *dev = acpi_driver_data(adev);
kobject_uevent(&dev->kobj, KOBJ_ONLINE);
}
ACPI / container: Use hotplug profile user space interface Make the ACPI container driver register its ACPI scan handler object using acpi_scan_add_handler_with_hotplug() to allow user space to manipulate its hotplug profile attributes. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Tested-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-03-04 06:08:45 +08:00
static struct acpi_scan_handler container_handler = {
ACPI: autoload modules - Create __mod_acpi_device_table symbol for all ACPI drivers modpost is going to use these to create e.g. acpi:ACPI0001 in modules.alias. Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-07-23 20:44:41 +08:00
.ids = container_device_ids,
ACPI / scan: Make container driver use struct acpi_scan_handler Make the ACPI container driver use struct acpi_scan_handler for representing the object used to initialize ACPI containers and remove the ACPI driver structure used previously and the data structures created by it, since in fact they were not used for any purpose. This simplifies the code and reduces the kernel's memory footprint by avoiding the registration of a struct device_driver object with the driver core and creation of its sysfs directory which is unnecessary. In addition to that, make the namespace walk callback used for installing the notify handlers for ACPI containers more straightforward. This change includes fixes from Toshi Kani. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Tested-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-02-09 06:52:39 +08:00
.attach = container_device_attach,
ACPI / hotplug: Move container-specific code out of the core Move container-specific uevents from the core hotplug code to the container scan handler's .attach() and .detach() callbacks. This way the core will not have to special-case containers and the uevents will be guaranteed to happen every time a container is either scanned or trimmed as appropriate. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2013-11-23 04:55:32 +08:00
.detach = container_device_detach,
ACPI / container: Use common hotplug code Switch the ACPI container driver to using common device hotplug code introduced previously. This reduces the driver down to a trivial definition and registration of a struct acpi_scan_handler object. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Tested-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-03-04 06:05:55 +08:00
.hotplug = {
.enabled = true,
ACPI / hotplug / driver core: Handle containers in a special way ACPI container devices require special hotplug handling, at least on some systems, since generally user space needs to carry out system-specific cleanup before it makes sense to offline devices in the container. However, the current ACPI hotplug code for containers first attempts to offline devices in the container and only then it notifies user space of the container offline. Moreover, after commit 202317a573b2 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace), ACPI device objects representing containers are present as long as the ACPI namespace nodes corresponding to them are present, which may be forever, even if the container devices are physically detached from the system (the return values of the corresponding _STA methods change in those cases, but generally the namespace nodes themselves are still there). Thus it is useful to introduce entities representing containers that will go away during container hot-unplug. The goal of this change is to address both the above issues. The idea is to create a "companion" container system device for each of the ACPI container device objects during the initial namespace scan or on a hotplug event making the container present. That system device will be unregistered on container removal. A new bus type for container devices is added for this purpose, because device offline and online operations need to be defined for them. The online operation is a trivial function that is always successful and the offline uses a callback pointed to by the container device's offline member. For ACPI containers that callback simply walks the list of ACPI device objects right below the container object (its children) and checks if all of their physical companion devices are offline. If that's not the case, it returns -EBUSY and the container system devivce cannot be put offline. Consequently, to put the container system device offline, it is necessary to put all of the physical devices depending on its ACPI companion object offline beforehand. Container system devices created for ACPI container objects are initially online. They are created by the container ACPI scan handler whose hotplug.demand_offline flag is set. That causes acpi_scan_hot_remove() to check if the companion container system device is offline before attempting to remove an ACPI container or any devices below it. If the check fails, a KOBJ_CHANGE uevent is emitted for the container system device in question and user space is expected to offline all devices below the container and the container itself in response to it. Then, user space can finalize the removal of the container with the help of its ACPI device object's eject attribute in sysfs. Tested-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2013-12-29 22:25:48 +08:00
.demand_offline = true,
ACPI / hotplug: Generate online uevents for ACPI containers Commit 46394fd01 (ACPI / hotplug: Move container-specific code out of the core) removed the generation of "online" uevents for containers, because "add" uevents are now generated for them automatically when container system devices are registered. However, there are user space tools that need to be notified when the container and all of its children have been enumerated, which doesn't happen any more. For this reason, add a mechanism allowing "online" uevents to be generated for ACPI containers after enumerating the container along with all of its children. Fixes: 46394fd01 (ACPI / hotplug: Move container-specific code out of the core) Reported-and-tested-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: 3.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-09-21 08:58:18 +08:00
.notify_online = container_device_online,
ACPI / container: Use common hotplug code Switch the ACPI container driver to using common device hotplug code introduced previously. This reduces the driver down to a trivial definition and registration of a struct acpi_scan_handler object. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Tested-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-03-04 06:05:55 +08:00
},
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
};
ACPI / scan: always register container scan handler Prevent platform devices from being created for ACPI containers if CONFIG_ACPI_CONTAINER is unset by compiling out the container scan handler's callbacks only in that case and still compiling its device ID list in and registering the scan handler in either case. This change is based on a prototype from Zhang Rui. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2014-05-30 10:28:20 +08:00
void __init acpi_container_init(void)
{
acpi_scan_add_handler(&container_handler);
}
#else
static struct acpi_scan_handler container_handler = {
.ids = container_device_ids,
};
ACPI / scan: Make container driver use struct acpi_scan_handler Make the ACPI container driver use struct acpi_scan_handler for representing the object used to initialize ACPI containers and remove the ACPI driver structure used previously and the data structures created by it, since in fact they were not used for any purpose. This simplifies the code and reduces the kernel's memory footprint by avoiding the registration of a struct device_driver object with the driver core and creation of its sysfs directory which is unnecessary. In addition to that, make the namespace walk callback used for installing the notify handlers for ACPI containers more straightforward. This change includes fixes from Toshi Kani. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Tested-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-02-09 06:52:39 +08:00
void __init acpi_container_init(void)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
{
ACPI / container: Use hotplug profile user space interface Make the ACPI container driver register its ACPI scan handler object using acpi_scan_add_handler_with_hotplug() to allow user space to manipulate its hotplug profile attributes. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Tested-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-03-04 06:08:45 +08:00
acpi_scan_add_handler_with_hotplug(&container_handler, "container");
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
}
ACPI / scan: always register container scan handler Prevent platform devices from being created for ACPI containers if CONFIG_ACPI_CONTAINER is unset by compiling out the container scan handler's callbacks only in that case and still compiling its device ID list in and registering the scan handler in either case. This change is based on a prototype from Zhang Rui. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2014-05-30 10:28:20 +08:00
#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_CONTAINER */