2005-04-29 23:23:29 +08:00
|
|
|
/* auditsc.c -- System-call auditing support
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
* Handles all system-call specific auditing features.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright 2003-2004 Red Hat Inc., Durham, North Carolina.
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2005 IBM Corporation
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
* All Rights Reserved.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
|
|
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
|
|
|
* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
|
|
|
|
* (at your option) any later version.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
|
|
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
|
|
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
|
|
|
* GNU General Public License for more details.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
|
|
|
* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
|
|
|
|
* Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Written by Rickard E. (Rik) Faith <faith@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Many of the ideas implemented here are from Stephen C. Tweedie,
|
|
|
|
* especially the idea of avoiding a copy by using getname.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* The method for actual interception of syscall entry and exit (not in
|
|
|
|
* this file -- see entry.S) is based on a GPL'd patch written by
|
|
|
|
* okir@suse.de and Copyright 2003 SuSE Linux AG.
|
|
|
|
*
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
* The support of additional filter rules compares (>, <, >=, <=) was
|
|
|
|
* added by Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>, 2005.
|
|
|
|
*
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/init.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <asm/types.h>
|
2006-01-19 09:44:07 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <asm/atomic.h>
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/mm.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/module.h>
|
2005-05-21 07:15:52 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/mount.h>
|
2005-05-17 19:08:48 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/socket.h>
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/audit.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/personality.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/time.h>
|
2005-06-21 23:22:01 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/kthread.h>
|
2005-06-24 21:14:05 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/netlink.h>
|
2005-07-14 05:47:07 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/compiler.h>
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <asm/unistd.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* 0 = no checking
|
|
|
|
1 = put_count checking
|
|
|
|
2 = verbose put_count checking
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#define AUDIT_DEBUG 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* No syscall auditing will take place unless audit_enabled != 0. */
|
|
|
|
extern int audit_enabled;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* AUDIT_NAMES is the number of slots we reserve in the audit_context
|
|
|
|
* for saving names from getname(). */
|
|
|
|
#define AUDIT_NAMES 20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* AUDIT_NAMES_RESERVED is the number of slots we reserve in the
|
|
|
|
* audit_context from being used for nameless inodes from
|
|
|
|
* path_lookup. */
|
|
|
|
#define AUDIT_NAMES_RESERVED 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* At task start time, the audit_state is set in the audit_context using
|
|
|
|
a per-task filter. At syscall entry, the audit_state is augmented by
|
|
|
|
the syscall filter. */
|
|
|
|
enum audit_state {
|
|
|
|
AUDIT_DISABLED, /* Do not create per-task audit_context.
|
|
|
|
* No syscall-specific audit records can
|
|
|
|
* be generated. */
|
|
|
|
AUDIT_SETUP_CONTEXT, /* Create the per-task audit_context,
|
|
|
|
* but don't necessarily fill it in at
|
|
|
|
* syscall entry time (i.e., filter
|
|
|
|
* instead). */
|
|
|
|
AUDIT_BUILD_CONTEXT, /* Create the per-task audit_context,
|
|
|
|
* and always fill it in at syscall
|
|
|
|
* entry time. This makes a full
|
|
|
|
* syscall record available if some
|
|
|
|
* other part of the kernel decides it
|
|
|
|
* should be recorded. */
|
|
|
|
AUDIT_RECORD_CONTEXT /* Create the per-task audit_context,
|
|
|
|
* always fill it in at syscall entry
|
|
|
|
* time, and always write out the audit
|
|
|
|
* record at syscall exit time. */
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* When fs/namei.c:getname() is called, we store the pointer in name and
|
|
|
|
* we don't let putname() free it (instead we free all of the saved
|
|
|
|
* pointers at syscall exit time).
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Further, in fs/namei.c:path_lookup() we store the inode and device. */
|
|
|
|
struct audit_names {
|
|
|
|
const char *name;
|
|
|
|
unsigned long ino;
|
|
|
|
dev_t dev;
|
|
|
|
umode_t mode;
|
|
|
|
uid_t uid;
|
|
|
|
gid_t gid;
|
|
|
|
dev_t rdev;
|
2005-06-20 23:11:05 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned flags;
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct audit_aux_data {
|
|
|
|
struct audit_aux_data *next;
|
|
|
|
int type;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define AUDIT_AUX_IPCPERM 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct audit_aux_data_ipcctl {
|
|
|
|
struct audit_aux_data d;
|
|
|
|
struct ipc_perm p;
|
|
|
|
unsigned long qbytes;
|
|
|
|
uid_t uid;
|
|
|
|
gid_t gid;
|
|
|
|
mode_t mode;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2005-05-17 19:08:48 +08:00
|
|
|
struct audit_aux_data_socketcall {
|
|
|
|
struct audit_aux_data d;
|
|
|
|
int nargs;
|
|
|
|
unsigned long args[0];
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct audit_aux_data_sockaddr {
|
|
|
|
struct audit_aux_data d;
|
|
|
|
int len;
|
|
|
|
char a[0];
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2005-05-21 07:15:52 +08:00
|
|
|
struct audit_aux_data_path {
|
|
|
|
struct audit_aux_data d;
|
|
|
|
struct dentry *dentry;
|
|
|
|
struct vfsmount *mnt;
|
|
|
|
};
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* The per-task audit context. */
|
|
|
|
struct audit_context {
|
|
|
|
int in_syscall; /* 1 if task is in a syscall */
|
|
|
|
enum audit_state state;
|
|
|
|
unsigned int serial; /* serial number for record */
|
|
|
|
struct timespec ctime; /* time of syscall entry */
|
|
|
|
uid_t loginuid; /* login uid (identity) */
|
|
|
|
int major; /* syscall number */
|
|
|
|
unsigned long argv[4]; /* syscall arguments */
|
|
|
|
int return_valid; /* return code is valid */
|
2005-04-29 23:08:28 +08:00
|
|
|
long return_code;/* syscall return code */
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
int auditable; /* 1 if record should be written */
|
|
|
|
int name_count;
|
|
|
|
struct audit_names names[AUDIT_NAMES];
|
2005-05-27 19:17:28 +08:00
|
|
|
struct dentry * pwd;
|
|
|
|
struct vfsmount * pwdmnt;
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
struct audit_context *previous; /* For nested syscalls */
|
|
|
|
struct audit_aux_data *aux;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Save things to print about task_struct */
|
|
|
|
pid_t pid;
|
|
|
|
uid_t uid, euid, suid, fsuid;
|
|
|
|
gid_t gid, egid, sgid, fsgid;
|
|
|
|
unsigned long personality;
|
2005-04-29 23:08:28 +08:00
|
|
|
int arch;
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#if AUDIT_DEBUG
|
|
|
|
int put_count;
|
|
|
|
int ino_count;
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Public API */
|
|
|
|
/* There are three lists of rules -- one to search at task creation
|
|
|
|
* time, one to search at syscall entry time, and another to search at
|
|
|
|
* syscall exit time. */
|
2005-06-20 02:35:50 +08:00
|
|
|
static struct list_head audit_filter_list[AUDIT_NR_FILTERS] = {
|
|
|
|
LIST_HEAD_INIT(audit_filter_list[0]),
|
|
|
|
LIST_HEAD_INIT(audit_filter_list[1]),
|
|
|
|
LIST_HEAD_INIT(audit_filter_list[2]),
|
|
|
|
LIST_HEAD_INIT(audit_filter_list[3]),
|
|
|
|
LIST_HEAD_INIT(audit_filter_list[4]),
|
|
|
|
#if AUDIT_NR_FILTERS != 5
|
|
|
|
#error Fix audit_filter_list initialiser
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
};
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct audit_entry {
|
|
|
|
struct list_head list;
|
|
|
|
struct rcu_head rcu;
|
|
|
|
struct audit_rule rule;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2005-05-19 18:23:13 +08:00
|
|
|
extern int audit_pid;
|
|
|
|
|
2005-08-17 23:05:35 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Copy rule from user-space to kernel-space. Called from
|
|
|
|
* audit_add_rule during AUDIT_ADD. */
|
|
|
|
static inline int audit_copy_rule(struct audit_rule *d, struct audit_rule *s)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (s->action != AUDIT_NEVER
|
|
|
|
&& s->action != AUDIT_POSSIBLE
|
|
|
|
&& s->action != AUDIT_ALWAYS)
|
|
|
|
return -1;
|
|
|
|
if (s->field_count < 0 || s->field_count > AUDIT_MAX_FIELDS)
|
|
|
|
return -1;
|
|
|
|
if ((s->flags & ~AUDIT_FILTER_PREPEND) >= AUDIT_NR_FILTERS)
|
|
|
|
return -1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d->flags = s->flags;
|
|
|
|
d->action = s->action;
|
|
|
|
d->field_count = s->field_count;
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < d->field_count; i++) {
|
|
|
|
d->fields[i] = s->fields[i];
|
|
|
|
d->values[i] = s->values[i];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < AUDIT_BITMASK_SIZE; i++) d->mask[i] = s->mask[i];
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Check to see if two rules are identical. It is called from
|
2005-08-17 23:05:35 +08:00
|
|
|
* audit_add_rule during AUDIT_ADD and
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
* audit_del_rule during AUDIT_DEL. */
|
2005-08-17 23:05:35 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline int audit_compare_rule(struct audit_rule *a, struct audit_rule *b)
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (a->flags != b->flags)
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (a->action != b->action)
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (a->field_count != b->field_count)
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < a->field_count; i++) {
|
|
|
|
if (a->fields[i] != b->fields[i]
|
|
|
|
|| a->values[i] != b->values[i])
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < AUDIT_BITMASK_SIZE; i++)
|
|
|
|
if (a->mask[i] != b->mask[i])
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Note that audit_add_rule and audit_del_rule are called via
|
|
|
|
* audit_receive() in audit.c, and are protected by
|
|
|
|
* audit_netlink_sem. */
|
2005-08-17 23:05:35 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline int audit_add_rule(struct audit_rule *rule,
|
2005-06-20 02:35:50 +08:00
|
|
|
struct list_head *list)
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2005-08-17 23:05:35 +08:00
|
|
|
struct audit_entry *entry;
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
int i;
|
2005-08-17 23:05:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Do not use the _rcu iterator here, since this is the only
|
|
|
|
* addition routine. */
|
|
|
|
list_for_each_entry(entry, list, list) {
|
|
|
|
if (!audit_compare_rule(rule, &entry->rule)) {
|
|
|
|
return -EEXIST;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < rule->field_count; i++) {
|
|
|
|
if (rule->fields[i] & AUDIT_UNUSED_BITS)
|
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
if ( rule->fields[i] & AUDIT_NEGATE )
|
|
|
|
rule->fields[i] |= AUDIT_NOT_EQUAL;
|
|
|
|
else if ( (rule->fields[i] & AUDIT_OPERATORS) == 0 )
|
|
|
|
rule->fields[i] |= AUDIT_EQUAL;
|
|
|
|
rule->fields[i] &= (~AUDIT_NEGATE);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-08-17 23:05:35 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!(entry = kmalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL)))
|
|
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
if (audit_copy_rule(&entry->rule, rule)) {
|
|
|
|
kfree(entry);
|
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-20 02:35:50 +08:00
|
|
|
if (entry->rule.flags & AUDIT_FILTER_PREPEND) {
|
|
|
|
entry->rule.flags &= ~AUDIT_FILTER_PREPEND;
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
list_add_rcu(&entry->list, list);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
list_add_tail_rcu(&entry->list, list);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2005-08-17 23:05:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-08-17 23:05:35 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline void audit_free_rule(struct rcu_head *head)
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct audit_entry *e = container_of(head, struct audit_entry, rcu);
|
|
|
|
kfree(e);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Note that audit_add_rule and audit_del_rule are called via
|
|
|
|
* audit_receive() in audit.c, and are protected by
|
|
|
|
* audit_netlink_sem. */
|
|
|
|
static inline int audit_del_rule(struct audit_rule *rule,
|
|
|
|
struct list_head *list)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct audit_entry *e;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Do not use the _rcu iterator here, since this is the only
|
|
|
|
* deletion routine. */
|
|
|
|
list_for_each_entry(e, list, list) {
|
|
|
|
if (!audit_compare_rule(rule, &e->rule)) {
|
|
|
|
list_del_rcu(&e->list);
|
|
|
|
call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2005-06-20 02:35:50 +08:00
|
|
|
return -ENOENT; /* No matching rule */
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-21 23:22:01 +08:00
|
|
|
static int audit_list_rules(void *_dest)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int pid, seq;
|
|
|
|
int *dest = _dest;
|
|
|
|
struct audit_entry *entry;
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pid = dest[0];
|
|
|
|
seq = dest[1];
|
|
|
|
kfree(dest);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
down(&audit_netlink_sem);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* The *_rcu iterators not needed here because we are
|
|
|
|
always called with audit_netlink_sem held. */
|
|
|
|
for (i=0; i<AUDIT_NR_FILTERS; i++) {
|
|
|
|
list_for_each_entry(entry, &audit_filter_list[i], list)
|
|
|
|
audit_send_reply(pid, seq, AUDIT_LIST, 0, 1,
|
|
|
|
&entry->rule, sizeof(entry->rule));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
audit_send_reply(pid, seq, AUDIT_LIST, 1, 1, NULL, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
up(&audit_netlink_sem);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-14 03:47:11 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* audit_receive_filter - apply all rules to the specified message type
|
|
|
|
* @type: audit message type
|
|
|
|
* @pid: target pid for netlink audit messages
|
|
|
|
* @uid: target uid for netlink audit messages
|
|
|
|
* @seq: netlink audit message sequence (serial) number
|
|
|
|
* @data: payload data
|
|
|
|
* @loginuid: loginuid of sender
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2005-04-29 23:27:17 +08:00
|
|
|
int audit_receive_filter(int type, int pid, int uid, int seq, void *data,
|
|
|
|
uid_t loginuid)
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2005-06-21 23:22:01 +08:00
|
|
|
struct task_struct *tsk;
|
|
|
|
int *dest;
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
int err = 0;
|
2005-06-20 02:35:50 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned listnr;
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (type) {
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_LIST:
|
2005-06-21 23:22:01 +08:00
|
|
|
/* We can't just spew out the rules here because we might fill
|
|
|
|
* the available socket buffer space and deadlock waiting for
|
|
|
|
* auditctl to read from it... which isn't ever going to
|
|
|
|
* happen if we're actually running in the context of auditctl
|
|
|
|
* trying to _send_ the stuff */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dest = kmalloc(2 * sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
|
|
|
|
if (!dest)
|
|
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
dest[0] = pid;
|
|
|
|
dest[1] = seq;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tsk = kthread_run(audit_list_rules, dest, "audit_list_rules");
|
|
|
|
if (IS_ERR(tsk)) {
|
|
|
|
kfree(dest);
|
|
|
|
err = PTR_ERR(tsk);
|
2005-06-20 02:35:50 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_ADD:
|
2005-08-17 23:05:35 +08:00
|
|
|
listnr =((struct audit_rule *)data)->flags & ~AUDIT_FILTER_PREPEND;
|
|
|
|
if (listnr >= AUDIT_NR_FILTERS)
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
2005-08-17 23:05:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = audit_add_rule(data, &audit_filter_list[listnr]);
|
|
|
|
if (!err)
|
|
|
|
audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE,
|
|
|
|
"auid=%u added an audit rule\n", loginuid);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_DEL:
|
2005-06-20 02:35:50 +08:00
|
|
|
listnr =((struct audit_rule *)data)->flags & ~AUDIT_FILTER_PREPEND;
|
|
|
|
if (listnr >= AUDIT_NR_FILTERS)
|
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = audit_del_rule(data, &audit_filter_list[listnr]);
|
|
|
|
if (!err)
|
2005-06-22 22:04:33 +08:00
|
|
|
audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE,
|
2005-06-20 02:35:50 +08:00
|
|
|
"auid=%u removed an audit rule\n", loginuid);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
static int audit_comparator(const u32 left, const u32 op, const u32 right)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
switch (op) {
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_EQUAL:
|
|
|
|
return (left == right);
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_NOT_EQUAL:
|
|
|
|
return (left != right);
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_LESS_THAN:
|
|
|
|
return (left < right);
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL:
|
|
|
|
return (left <= right);
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_GREATER_THAN:
|
|
|
|
return (left > right);
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_GREATER_THAN_OR_EQUAL:
|
|
|
|
return (left >= right);
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Compare a task_struct with an audit_rule. Return 1 on match, 0
|
|
|
|
* otherwise. */
|
|
|
|
static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
|
|
|
|
struct audit_rule *rule,
|
|
|
|
struct audit_context *ctx,
|
|
|
|
enum audit_state *state)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i, j;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < rule->field_count; i++) {
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
u32 field = rule->fields[i] & ~AUDIT_OPERATORS;
|
|
|
|
u32 op = rule->fields[i] & AUDIT_OPERATORS;
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
u32 value = rule->values[i];
|
|
|
|
int result = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (field) {
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_PID:
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
result = audit_comparator(tsk->pid, op, value);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_UID:
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
result = audit_comparator(tsk->uid, op, value);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_EUID:
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
result = audit_comparator(tsk->euid, op, value);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_SUID:
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
result = audit_comparator(tsk->suid, op, value);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_FSUID:
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
result = audit_comparator(tsk->fsuid, op, value);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_GID:
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
result = audit_comparator(tsk->gid, op, value);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_EGID:
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
result = audit_comparator(tsk->egid, op, value);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_SGID:
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
result = audit_comparator(tsk->sgid, op, value);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_FSGID:
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
result = audit_comparator(tsk->fsgid, op, value);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_PERS:
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
result = audit_comparator(tsk->personality, op, value);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
2005-04-29 23:08:28 +08:00
|
|
|
case AUDIT_ARCH:
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
if (ctx)
|
|
|
|
result = audit_comparator(ctx->arch, op, value);
|
2005-04-29 23:08:28 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_EXIT:
|
|
|
|
if (ctx && ctx->return_valid)
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
result = audit_comparator(ctx->return_code, op, value);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_SUCCESS:
|
2005-08-27 17:25:43 +08:00
|
|
|
if (ctx && ctx->return_valid) {
|
|
|
|
if (value)
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
result = audit_comparator(ctx->return_valid, op, AUDITSC_SUCCESS);
|
2005-08-27 17:25:43 +08:00
|
|
|
else
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
result = audit_comparator(ctx->return_valid, op, AUDITSC_FAILURE);
|
2005-08-27 17:25:43 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_DEVMAJOR:
|
|
|
|
if (ctx) {
|
|
|
|
for (j = 0; j < ctx->name_count; j++) {
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
if (audit_comparator(MAJOR(ctx->names[j].dev), op, value)) {
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
++result;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_DEVMINOR:
|
|
|
|
if (ctx) {
|
|
|
|
for (j = 0; j < ctx->name_count; j++) {
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
if (audit_comparator(MINOR(ctx->names[j].dev), op, value)) {
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
++result;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_INODE:
|
|
|
|
if (ctx) {
|
|
|
|
for (j = 0; j < ctx->name_count; j++) {
|
2005-11-03 23:57:06 +08:00
|
|
|
if ( audit_comparator(ctx->names[j].ino, op, value)) {
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
++result;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_LOGINUID:
|
|
|
|
result = 0;
|
|
|
|
if (ctx)
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
result = audit_comparator(ctx->loginuid, op, value);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_ARG0:
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_ARG1:
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_ARG2:
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_ARG3:
|
|
|
|
if (ctx)
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
result = audit_comparator(ctx->argv[field-AUDIT_ARG0], op, value);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!result)
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
switch (rule->action) {
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_NEVER: *state = AUDIT_DISABLED; break;
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_POSSIBLE: *state = AUDIT_BUILD_CONTEXT; break;
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_ALWAYS: *state = AUDIT_RECORD_CONTEXT; break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* At process creation time, we can determine if system-call auditing is
|
|
|
|
* completely disabled for this task. Since we only have the task
|
|
|
|
* structure at this point, we can only check uid and gid.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static enum audit_state audit_filter_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct audit_entry *e;
|
|
|
|
enum audit_state state;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rcu_read_lock();
|
2005-06-20 02:35:50 +08:00
|
|
|
list_for_each_entry_rcu(e, &audit_filter_list[AUDIT_FILTER_TASK], list) {
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
if (audit_filter_rules(tsk, &e->rule, NULL, &state)) {
|
|
|
|
rcu_read_unlock();
|
|
|
|
return state;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
rcu_read_unlock();
|
|
|
|
return AUDIT_BUILD_CONTEXT;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* At syscall entry and exit time, this filter is called if the
|
|
|
|
* audit_state is not low enough that auditing cannot take place, but is
|
2005-05-14 01:35:15 +08:00
|
|
|
* also not high enough that we already know we have to write an audit
|
2005-09-14 03:47:11 +08:00
|
|
|
* record (i.e., the state is AUDIT_SETUP_CONTEXT or AUDIT_BUILD_CONTEXT).
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static enum audit_state audit_filter_syscall(struct task_struct *tsk,
|
|
|
|
struct audit_context *ctx,
|
|
|
|
struct list_head *list)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct audit_entry *e;
|
2005-08-17 21:49:57 +08:00
|
|
|
enum audit_state state;
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-07-14 21:40:06 +08:00
|
|
|
if (audit_pid && tsk->tgid == audit_pid)
|
2005-06-20 23:07:33 +08:00
|
|
|
return AUDIT_DISABLED;
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
rcu_read_lock();
|
2005-08-17 21:49:57 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!list_empty(list)) {
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
int word = AUDIT_WORD(ctx->major);
|
|
|
|
int bit = AUDIT_BIT(ctx->major);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
list_for_each_entry_rcu(e, list, list) {
|
|
|
|
if ((e->rule.mask[word] & bit) == bit
|
|
|
|
&& audit_filter_rules(tsk, &e->rule, ctx, &state)) {
|
|
|
|
rcu_read_unlock();
|
|
|
|
return state;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
rcu_read_unlock();
|
|
|
|
return AUDIT_BUILD_CONTEXT;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-24 21:14:05 +08:00
|
|
|
static int audit_filter_user_rules(struct netlink_skb_parms *cb,
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
struct audit_rule *rule,
|
|
|
|
enum audit_state *state)
|
2005-06-24 21:14:05 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < rule->field_count; i++) {
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
u32 field = rule->fields[i] & ~AUDIT_OPERATORS;
|
|
|
|
u32 op = rule->fields[i] & AUDIT_OPERATORS;
|
2005-06-24 21:14:05 +08:00
|
|
|
u32 value = rule->values[i];
|
|
|
|
int result = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (field) {
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_PID:
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
result = audit_comparator(cb->creds.pid, op, value);
|
2005-06-24 21:14:05 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_UID:
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
result = audit_comparator(cb->creds.uid, op, value);
|
2005-06-24 21:14:05 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_GID:
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
result = audit_comparator(cb->creds.gid, op, value);
|
2005-06-24 21:14:05 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_LOGINUID:
|
[PATCH] Filter rule comparators
Currently, audit only supports the "=" and "!=" operators in the -F
filter rules.
This patch reworks the support for "=" and "!=", and adds support
for ">", ">=", "<", and "<=".
This turned out to be a pretty clean, and simply process. I ended up
using the high order bits of the "field", as suggested by Steve and Amy.
This allowed for no changes whatsoever to the netlink communications.
See the documentation within the patch in the include/linux/audit.h
area, where there is a table that explains the reasoning of the bitmask
assignments clearly.
The patch adds a new function, audit_comparator(left, op, right).
This function will perform the specified comparison (op, which defaults
to "==" for backward compatibility) between two values (left and right).
If the negate bit is on, it will negate whatever that result was. This
value is returned.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2005-11-03 23:41:46 +08:00
|
|
|
result = audit_comparator(cb->loginuid, op, value);
|
2005-06-24 21:14:05 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!result)
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
switch (rule->action) {
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_NEVER: *state = AUDIT_DISABLED; break;
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_POSSIBLE: *state = AUDIT_BUILD_CONTEXT; break;
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_ALWAYS: *state = AUDIT_RECORD_CONTEXT; break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int audit_filter_user(struct netlink_skb_parms *cb, int type)
|
2005-06-20 02:35:50 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct audit_entry *e;
|
|
|
|
enum audit_state state;
|
2005-06-22 21:56:47 +08:00
|
|
|
int ret = 1;
|
2005-06-20 02:35:50 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rcu_read_lock();
|
|
|
|
list_for_each_entry_rcu(e, &audit_filter_list[AUDIT_FILTER_USER], list) {
|
2005-06-24 21:14:05 +08:00
|
|
|
if (audit_filter_user_rules(cb, &e->rule, &state)) {
|
2005-06-22 21:56:47 +08:00
|
|
|
if (state == AUDIT_DISABLED)
|
|
|
|
ret = 0;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
2005-06-20 02:35:50 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
rcu_read_unlock();
|
2005-06-22 21:56:47 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-24 15:21:49 +08:00
|
|
|
return ret; /* Audit by default */
|
2005-06-20 02:35:50 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
/* This should be called with task_lock() held. */
|
|
|
|
static inline struct audit_context *audit_get_context(struct task_struct *tsk,
|
|
|
|
int return_valid,
|
|
|
|
int return_code)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct audit_context *context = tsk->audit_context;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (likely(!context))
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
context->return_valid = return_valid;
|
|
|
|
context->return_code = return_code;
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-02 21:10:46 +08:00
|
|
|
if (context->in_syscall && !context->auditable) {
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
enum audit_state state;
|
2005-06-20 02:35:50 +08:00
|
|
|
state = audit_filter_syscall(tsk, context, &audit_filter_list[AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT]);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
if (state == AUDIT_RECORD_CONTEXT)
|
|
|
|
context->auditable = 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context->pid = tsk->pid;
|
|
|
|
context->uid = tsk->uid;
|
|
|
|
context->gid = tsk->gid;
|
|
|
|
context->euid = tsk->euid;
|
|
|
|
context->suid = tsk->suid;
|
|
|
|
context->fsuid = tsk->fsuid;
|
|
|
|
context->egid = tsk->egid;
|
|
|
|
context->sgid = tsk->sgid;
|
|
|
|
context->fsgid = tsk->fsgid;
|
|
|
|
context->personality = tsk->personality;
|
|
|
|
tsk->audit_context = NULL;
|
|
|
|
return context;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static inline void audit_free_names(struct audit_context *context)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#if AUDIT_DEBUG == 2
|
|
|
|
if (context->auditable
|
|
|
|
||context->put_count + context->ino_count != context->name_count) {
|
|
|
|
printk(KERN_ERR "audit.c:%d(:%d): major=%d in_syscall=%d"
|
|
|
|
" name_count=%d put_count=%d"
|
|
|
|
" ino_count=%d [NOT freeing]\n",
|
|
|
|
__LINE__,
|
|
|
|
context->serial, context->major, context->in_syscall,
|
|
|
|
context->name_count, context->put_count,
|
|
|
|
context->ino_count);
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < context->name_count; i++)
|
|
|
|
printk(KERN_ERR "names[%d] = %p = %s\n", i,
|
|
|
|
context->names[i].name,
|
|
|
|
context->names[i].name);
|
|
|
|
dump_stack();
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
#if AUDIT_DEBUG
|
|
|
|
context->put_count = 0;
|
|
|
|
context->ino_count = 0;
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < context->name_count; i++)
|
|
|
|
if (context->names[i].name)
|
|
|
|
__putname(context->names[i].name);
|
|
|
|
context->name_count = 0;
|
2005-05-27 19:17:28 +08:00
|
|
|
if (context->pwd)
|
|
|
|
dput(context->pwd);
|
|
|
|
if (context->pwdmnt)
|
|
|
|
mntput(context->pwdmnt);
|
|
|
|
context->pwd = NULL;
|
|
|
|
context->pwdmnt = NULL;
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static inline void audit_free_aux(struct audit_context *context)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct audit_aux_data *aux;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while ((aux = context->aux)) {
|
2005-05-21 07:15:52 +08:00
|
|
|
if (aux->type == AUDIT_AVC_PATH) {
|
|
|
|
struct audit_aux_data_path *axi = (void *)aux;
|
|
|
|
dput(axi->dentry);
|
|
|
|
mntput(axi->mnt);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
context->aux = aux->next;
|
|
|
|
kfree(aux);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static inline void audit_zero_context(struct audit_context *context,
|
|
|
|
enum audit_state state)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
uid_t loginuid = context->loginuid;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
memset(context, 0, sizeof(*context));
|
|
|
|
context->state = state;
|
|
|
|
context->loginuid = loginuid;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_context(enum audit_state state)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct audit_context *context;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!(context = kmalloc(sizeof(*context), GFP_KERNEL)))
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
audit_zero_context(context, state);
|
|
|
|
return context;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-14 03:47:11 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* audit_alloc - allocate an audit context block for a task
|
|
|
|
* @tsk: task
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Filter on the task information and allocate a per-task audit context
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
* if necessary. Doing so turns on system call auditing for the
|
|
|
|
* specified task. This is called from copy_process, so no lock is
|
2005-09-14 03:47:11 +08:00
|
|
|
* needed.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
int audit_alloc(struct task_struct *tsk)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct audit_context *context;
|
|
|
|
enum audit_state state;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (likely(!audit_enabled))
|
|
|
|
return 0; /* Return if not auditing. */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
state = audit_filter_task(tsk);
|
|
|
|
if (likely(state == AUDIT_DISABLED))
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!(context = audit_alloc_context(state))) {
|
|
|
|
audit_log_lost("out of memory in audit_alloc");
|
|
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Preserve login uid */
|
|
|
|
context->loginuid = -1;
|
|
|
|
if (current->audit_context)
|
|
|
|
context->loginuid = current->audit_context->loginuid;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tsk->audit_context = context;
|
|
|
|
set_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static inline void audit_free_context(struct audit_context *context)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct audit_context *previous;
|
|
|
|
int count = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
do {
|
|
|
|
previous = context->previous;
|
|
|
|
if (previous || (count && count < 10)) {
|
|
|
|
++count;
|
|
|
|
printk(KERN_ERR "audit(:%d): major=%d name_count=%d:"
|
|
|
|
" freeing multiple contexts (%d)\n",
|
|
|
|
context->serial, context->major,
|
|
|
|
context->name_count, count);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
audit_free_names(context);
|
|
|
|
audit_free_aux(context);
|
|
|
|
kfree(context);
|
|
|
|
context = previous;
|
|
|
|
} while (context);
|
|
|
|
if (count >= 10)
|
|
|
|
printk(KERN_ERR "audit: freed %d contexts\n", count);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-19 01:47:35 +08:00
|
|
|
static void audit_log_task_info(struct audit_buffer *ab)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
char name[sizeof(current->comm)];
|
|
|
|
struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
|
|
|
|
struct vm_area_struct *vma;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
get_task_comm(name, current);
|
2005-05-24 04:57:41 +08:00
|
|
|
audit_log_format(ab, " comm=");
|
|
|
|
audit_log_untrustedstring(ab, name);
|
2005-04-19 01:47:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!mm)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
|
|
|
|
vma = mm->mmap;
|
|
|
|
while (vma) {
|
|
|
|
if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_EXECUTABLE) &&
|
|
|
|
vma->vm_file) {
|
|
|
|
audit_log_d_path(ab, "exe=",
|
|
|
|
vma->vm_file->f_dentry,
|
|
|
|
vma->vm_file->f_vfsmnt);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
vma = vma->vm_next;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-10-21 15:22:03 +08:00
|
|
|
static void audit_log_exit(struct audit_context *context, gfp_t gfp_mask)
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
struct audit_buffer *ab;
|
2005-05-26 19:04:57 +08:00
|
|
|
struct audit_aux_data *aux;
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-07-14 05:47:07 +08:00
|
|
|
ab = audit_log_start(context, gfp_mask, AUDIT_SYSCALL);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!ab)
|
|
|
|
return; /* audit_panic has been called */
|
2005-05-24 04:35:28 +08:00
|
|
|
audit_log_format(ab, "arch=%x syscall=%d",
|
|
|
|
context->arch, context->major);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
if (context->personality != PER_LINUX)
|
|
|
|
audit_log_format(ab, " per=%lx", context->personality);
|
|
|
|
if (context->return_valid)
|
2005-04-29 23:08:28 +08:00
|
|
|
audit_log_format(ab, " success=%s exit=%ld",
|
|
|
|
(context->return_valid==AUDITSC_SUCCESS)?"yes":"no",
|
|
|
|
context->return_code);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
audit_log_format(ab,
|
|
|
|
" a0=%lx a1=%lx a2=%lx a3=%lx items=%d"
|
2005-05-21 07:22:31 +08:00
|
|
|
" pid=%d auid=%u uid=%u gid=%u"
|
|
|
|
" euid=%u suid=%u fsuid=%u"
|
|
|
|
" egid=%u sgid=%u fsgid=%u",
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
context->argv[0],
|
|
|
|
context->argv[1],
|
|
|
|
context->argv[2],
|
|
|
|
context->argv[3],
|
|
|
|
context->name_count,
|
|
|
|
context->pid,
|
|
|
|
context->loginuid,
|
|
|
|
context->uid,
|
|
|
|
context->gid,
|
|
|
|
context->euid, context->suid, context->fsuid,
|
|
|
|
context->egid, context->sgid, context->fsgid);
|
2005-04-19 01:47:35 +08:00
|
|
|
audit_log_task_info(ab);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
audit_log_end(ab);
|
|
|
|
|
2005-05-26 19:04:57 +08:00
|
|
|
for (aux = context->aux; aux; aux = aux->next) {
|
2005-05-14 01:17:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-02-19 04:41:50 +08:00
|
|
|
ab = audit_log_start(context, gfp_mask, aux->type);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!ab)
|
|
|
|
continue; /* audit_panic has been called */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (aux->type) {
|
2005-05-14 01:17:42 +08:00
|
|
|
case AUDIT_IPC: {
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
struct audit_aux_data_ipcctl *axi = (void *)aux;
|
|
|
|
audit_log_format(ab,
|
2005-05-21 07:22:31 +08:00
|
|
|
" qbytes=%lx iuid=%u igid=%u mode=%x",
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
axi->qbytes, axi->uid, axi->gid, axi->mode);
|
2005-05-17 19:08:48 +08:00
|
|
|
break; }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_SOCKETCALL: {
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
struct audit_aux_data_socketcall *axs = (void *)aux;
|
|
|
|
audit_log_format(ab, "nargs=%d", axs->nargs);
|
|
|
|
for (i=0; i<axs->nargs; i++)
|
|
|
|
audit_log_format(ab, " a%d=%lx", i, axs->args[i]);
|
|
|
|
break; }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_SOCKADDR: {
|
|
|
|
struct audit_aux_data_sockaddr *axs = (void *)aux;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
audit_log_format(ab, "saddr=");
|
|
|
|
audit_log_hex(ab, axs->a, axs->len);
|
|
|
|
break; }
|
2005-05-21 07:15:52 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case AUDIT_AVC_PATH: {
|
|
|
|
struct audit_aux_data_path *axi = (void *)aux;
|
|
|
|
audit_log_d_path(ab, "path=", axi->dentry, axi->mnt);
|
|
|
|
break; }
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
audit_log_end(ab);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-05-27 19:17:28 +08:00
|
|
|
if (context->pwd && context->pwdmnt) {
|
2006-02-19 04:41:50 +08:00
|
|
|
ab = audit_log_start(context, gfp_mask, AUDIT_CWD);
|
2005-05-27 19:17:28 +08:00
|
|
|
if (ab) {
|
|
|
|
audit_log_d_path(ab, "cwd=", context->pwd, context->pwdmnt);
|
|
|
|
audit_log_end(ab);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < context->name_count; i++) {
|
2006-02-19 04:41:50 +08:00
|
|
|
ab = audit_log_start(context, gfp_mask, AUDIT_PATH);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!ab)
|
|
|
|
continue; /* audit_panic has been called */
|
2005-05-27 19:17:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
audit_log_format(ab, "item=%d", i);
|
2005-04-29 22:54:44 +08:00
|
|
|
if (context->names[i].name) {
|
|
|
|
audit_log_format(ab, " name=");
|
|
|
|
audit_log_untrustedstring(ab, context->names[i].name);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2005-06-20 23:11:05 +08:00
|
|
|
audit_log_format(ab, " flags=%x\n", context->names[i].flags);
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
if (context->names[i].ino != (unsigned long)-1)
|
|
|
|
audit_log_format(ab, " inode=%lu dev=%02x:%02x mode=%#o"
|
2005-05-21 07:22:31 +08:00
|
|
|
" ouid=%u ogid=%u rdev=%02x:%02x",
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
context->names[i].ino,
|
|
|
|
MAJOR(context->names[i].dev),
|
|
|
|
MINOR(context->names[i].dev),
|
|
|
|
context->names[i].mode,
|
|
|
|
context->names[i].uid,
|
|
|
|
context->names[i].gid,
|
|
|
|
MAJOR(context->names[i].rdev),
|
|
|
|
MINOR(context->names[i].rdev));
|
|
|
|
audit_log_end(ab);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-14 03:47:11 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* audit_free - free a per-task audit context
|
|
|
|
* @tsk: task whose audit context block to free
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Called from copy_process and __put_task_struct.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
void audit_free(struct task_struct *tsk)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct audit_context *context;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
task_lock(tsk);
|
|
|
|
context = audit_get_context(tsk, 0, 0);
|
|
|
|
task_unlock(tsk);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (likely(!context))
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Check for system calls that do not go through the exit
|
2005-07-14 05:47:07 +08:00
|
|
|
* function (e.g., exit_group), then free context block.
|
|
|
|
* We use GFP_ATOMIC here because we might be doing this
|
|
|
|
* in the context of the idle thread */
|
2005-06-20 23:07:33 +08:00
|
|
|
if (context->in_syscall && context->auditable)
|
2005-07-14 05:47:07 +08:00
|
|
|
audit_log_exit(context, GFP_ATOMIC);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
audit_free_context(context);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-14 03:47:11 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* audit_syscall_entry - fill in an audit record at syscall entry
|
|
|
|
* @tsk: task being audited
|
|
|
|
* @arch: architecture type
|
|
|
|
* @major: major syscall type (function)
|
|
|
|
* @a1: additional syscall register 1
|
|
|
|
* @a2: additional syscall register 2
|
|
|
|
* @a3: additional syscall register 3
|
|
|
|
* @a4: additional syscall register 4
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Fill in audit context at syscall entry. This only happens if the
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
* audit context was created when the task was created and the state or
|
|
|
|
* filters demand the audit context be built. If the state from the
|
|
|
|
* per-task filter or from the per-syscall filter is AUDIT_RECORD_CONTEXT,
|
|
|
|
* then the record will be written at syscall exit time (otherwise, it
|
|
|
|
* will only be written if another part of the kernel requests that it
|
2005-09-14 03:47:11 +08:00
|
|
|
* be written).
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2005-04-29 23:08:28 +08:00
|
|
|
void audit_syscall_entry(struct task_struct *tsk, int arch, int major,
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long a1, unsigned long a2,
|
|
|
|
unsigned long a3, unsigned long a4)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct audit_context *context = tsk->audit_context;
|
|
|
|
enum audit_state state;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BUG_ON(!context);
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-14 03:47:11 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* This happens only on certain architectures that make system
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
* calls in kernel_thread via the entry.S interface, instead of
|
|
|
|
* with direct calls. (If you are porting to a new
|
|
|
|
* architecture, hitting this condition can indicate that you
|
|
|
|
* got the _exit/_leave calls backward in entry.S.)
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* i386 no
|
|
|
|
* x86_64 no
|
|
|
|
* ppc64 yes (see arch/ppc64/kernel/misc.S)
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This also happens with vm86 emulation in a non-nested manner
|
|
|
|
* (entries without exits), so this case must be caught.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (context->in_syscall) {
|
|
|
|
struct audit_context *newctx;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#if AUDIT_DEBUG
|
|
|
|
printk(KERN_ERR
|
|
|
|
"audit(:%d) pid=%d in syscall=%d;"
|
|
|
|
" entering syscall=%d\n",
|
|
|
|
context->serial, tsk->pid, context->major, major);
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
newctx = audit_alloc_context(context->state);
|
|
|
|
if (newctx) {
|
|
|
|
newctx->previous = context;
|
|
|
|
context = newctx;
|
|
|
|
tsk->audit_context = newctx;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
/* If we can't alloc a new context, the best we
|
|
|
|
* can do is to leak memory (any pending putname
|
|
|
|
* will be lost). The only other alternative is
|
|
|
|
* to abandon auditing. */
|
|
|
|
audit_zero_context(context, context->state);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
BUG_ON(context->in_syscall || context->name_count);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!audit_enabled)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-29 23:08:28 +08:00
|
|
|
context->arch = arch;
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
context->major = major;
|
|
|
|
context->argv[0] = a1;
|
|
|
|
context->argv[1] = a2;
|
|
|
|
context->argv[2] = a3;
|
|
|
|
context->argv[3] = a4;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
state = context->state;
|
|
|
|
if (state == AUDIT_SETUP_CONTEXT || state == AUDIT_BUILD_CONTEXT)
|
2005-06-20 02:35:50 +08:00
|
|
|
state = audit_filter_syscall(tsk, context, &audit_filter_list[AUDIT_FILTER_ENTRY]);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
if (likely(state == AUDIT_DISABLED))
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-19 02:24:46 +08:00
|
|
|
context->serial = 0;
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
context->ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
|
|
|
|
context->in_syscall = 1;
|
|
|
|
context->auditable = !!(state == AUDIT_RECORD_CONTEXT);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-14 03:47:11 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* audit_syscall_exit - deallocate audit context after a system call
|
|
|
|
* @tsk: task being audited
|
|
|
|
* @valid: success/failure flag
|
|
|
|
* @return_code: syscall return value
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Tear down after system call. If the audit context has been marked as
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
* auditable (either because of the AUDIT_RECORD_CONTEXT state from
|
|
|
|
* filtering, or because some other part of the kernel write an audit
|
|
|
|
* message), then write out the syscall information. In call cases,
|
2005-09-14 03:47:11 +08:00
|
|
|
* free the names stored from getname().
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2005-04-29 23:08:28 +08:00
|
|
|
void audit_syscall_exit(struct task_struct *tsk, int valid, long return_code)
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct audit_context *context;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
get_task_struct(tsk);
|
|
|
|
task_lock(tsk);
|
2005-04-29 23:08:28 +08:00
|
|
|
context = audit_get_context(tsk, valid, return_code);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
task_unlock(tsk);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Not having a context here is ok, since the parent may have
|
|
|
|
* called __put_task_struct. */
|
|
|
|
if (likely(!context))
|
2005-08-17 21:45:55 +08:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-06-20 23:07:33 +08:00
|
|
|
if (context->in_syscall && context->auditable)
|
2005-07-14 05:47:07 +08:00
|
|
|
audit_log_exit(context, GFP_KERNEL);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context->in_syscall = 0;
|
|
|
|
context->auditable = 0;
|
2005-04-29 23:08:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
if (context->previous) {
|
|
|
|
struct audit_context *new_context = context->previous;
|
|
|
|
context->previous = NULL;
|
|
|
|
audit_free_context(context);
|
|
|
|
tsk->audit_context = new_context;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
audit_free_names(context);
|
|
|
|
audit_free_aux(context);
|
|
|
|
tsk->audit_context = context;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2005-08-17 21:45:55 +08:00
|
|
|
out:
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
put_task_struct(tsk);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-14 03:47:11 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* audit_getname - add a name to the list
|
|
|
|
* @name: name to add
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Add a name to the list of audit names for this context.
|
|
|
|
* Called from fs/namei.c:getname().
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
void audit_getname(const char *name)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct audit_context *context = current->audit_context;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!context || IS_ERR(name) || !name)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!context->in_syscall) {
|
|
|
|
#if AUDIT_DEBUG == 2
|
|
|
|
printk(KERN_ERR "%s:%d(:%d): ignoring getname(%p)\n",
|
|
|
|
__FILE__, __LINE__, context->serial, name);
|
|
|
|
dump_stack();
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
BUG_ON(context->name_count >= AUDIT_NAMES);
|
|
|
|
context->names[context->name_count].name = name;
|
|
|
|
context->names[context->name_count].ino = (unsigned long)-1;
|
|
|
|
++context->name_count;
|
2005-05-27 19:17:28 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!context->pwd) {
|
|
|
|
read_lock(¤t->fs->lock);
|
|
|
|
context->pwd = dget(current->fs->pwd);
|
|
|
|
context->pwdmnt = mntget(current->fs->pwdmnt);
|
|
|
|
read_unlock(¤t->fs->lock);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-14 03:47:11 +08:00
|
|
|
/* audit_putname - intercept a putname request
|
|
|
|
* @name: name to intercept and delay for putname
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* If we have stored the name from getname in the audit context,
|
|
|
|
* then we delay the putname until syscall exit.
|
|
|
|
* Called from include/linux/fs.h:putname().
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
void audit_putname(const char *name)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct audit_context *context = current->audit_context;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BUG_ON(!context);
|
|
|
|
if (!context->in_syscall) {
|
|
|
|
#if AUDIT_DEBUG == 2
|
|
|
|
printk(KERN_ERR "%s:%d(:%d): __putname(%p)\n",
|
|
|
|
__FILE__, __LINE__, context->serial, name);
|
|
|
|
if (context->name_count) {
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < context->name_count; i++)
|
|
|
|
printk(KERN_ERR "name[%d] = %p = %s\n", i,
|
|
|
|
context->names[i].name,
|
|
|
|
context->names[i].name);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
__putname(name);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#if AUDIT_DEBUG
|
|
|
|
else {
|
|
|
|
++context->put_count;
|
|
|
|
if (context->put_count > context->name_count) {
|
|
|
|
printk(KERN_ERR "%s:%d(:%d): major=%d"
|
|
|
|
" in_syscall=%d putname(%p) name_count=%d"
|
|
|
|
" put_count=%d\n",
|
|
|
|
__FILE__, __LINE__,
|
|
|
|
context->serial, context->major,
|
|
|
|
context->in_syscall, name, context->name_count,
|
|
|
|
context->put_count);
|
|
|
|
dump_stack();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-14 03:47:11 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* audit_inode - store the inode and device from a lookup
|
|
|
|
* @name: name being audited
|
|
|
|
* @inode: inode being audited
|
|
|
|
* @flags: lookup flags (as used in path_lookup())
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Called from fs/namei.c:path_lookup().
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2005-06-20 23:11:05 +08:00
|
|
|
void audit_inode(const char *name, const struct inode *inode, unsigned flags)
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int idx;
|
|
|
|
struct audit_context *context = current->audit_context;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!context->in_syscall)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
if (context->name_count
|
|
|
|
&& context->names[context->name_count-1].name
|
|
|
|
&& context->names[context->name_count-1].name == name)
|
|
|
|
idx = context->name_count - 1;
|
|
|
|
else if (context->name_count > 1
|
|
|
|
&& context->names[context->name_count-2].name
|
|
|
|
&& context->names[context->name_count-2].name == name)
|
|
|
|
idx = context->name_count - 2;
|
|
|
|
else {
|
|
|
|
/* FIXME: how much do we care about inodes that have no
|
|
|
|
* associated name? */
|
|
|
|
if (context->name_count >= AUDIT_NAMES - AUDIT_NAMES_RESERVED)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
idx = context->name_count++;
|
|
|
|
context->names[idx].name = NULL;
|
|
|
|
#if AUDIT_DEBUG
|
|
|
|
++context->ino_count;
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
}
|
2005-06-20 23:11:05 +08:00
|
|
|
context->names[idx].flags = flags;
|
|
|
|
context->names[idx].ino = inode->i_ino;
|
|
|
|
context->names[idx].dev = inode->i_sb->s_dev;
|
|
|
|
context->names[idx].mode = inode->i_mode;
|
|
|
|
context->names[idx].uid = inode->i_uid;
|
|
|
|
context->names[idx].gid = inode->i_gid;
|
|
|
|
context->names[idx].rdev = inode->i_rdev;
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-14 03:47:11 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* auditsc_get_stamp - get local copies of audit_context values
|
|
|
|
* @ctx: audit_context for the task
|
|
|
|
* @t: timespec to store time recorded in the audit_context
|
|
|
|
* @serial: serial value that is recorded in the audit_context
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Also sets the context as auditable.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2005-05-22 04:08:09 +08:00
|
|
|
void auditsc_get_stamp(struct audit_context *ctx,
|
|
|
|
struct timespec *t, unsigned int *serial)
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2005-07-19 02:24:46 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!ctx->serial)
|
|
|
|
ctx->serial = audit_serial();
|
2005-05-22 04:08:09 +08:00
|
|
|
t->tv_sec = ctx->ctime.tv_sec;
|
|
|
|
t->tv_nsec = ctx->ctime.tv_nsec;
|
|
|
|
*serial = ctx->serial;
|
|
|
|
ctx->auditable = 1;
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-14 03:47:11 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* audit_set_loginuid - set a task's audit_context loginuid
|
|
|
|
* @task: task whose audit context is being modified
|
|
|
|
* @loginuid: loginuid value
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns 0.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Called (set) from fs/proc/base.c::proc_loginuid_write().
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2005-04-30 00:30:07 +08:00
|
|
|
int audit_set_loginuid(struct task_struct *task, uid_t loginuid)
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2005-04-30 00:30:07 +08:00
|
|
|
if (task->audit_context) {
|
2005-05-14 01:17:42 +08:00
|
|
|
struct audit_buffer *ab;
|
|
|
|
|
2005-06-22 22:04:33 +08:00
|
|
|
ab = audit_log_start(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_LOGIN);
|
2005-05-14 01:17:42 +08:00
|
|
|
if (ab) {
|
|
|
|
audit_log_format(ab, "login pid=%d uid=%u "
|
2005-05-21 07:22:31 +08:00
|
|
|
"old auid=%u new auid=%u",
|
2005-05-14 01:17:42 +08:00
|
|
|
task->pid, task->uid,
|
|
|
|
task->audit_context->loginuid, loginuid);
|
|
|
|
audit_log_end(ab);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2005-04-30 00:30:07 +08:00
|
|
|
task->audit_context->loginuid = loginuid;
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-14 03:47:11 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* audit_get_loginuid - get the loginuid for an audit_context
|
|
|
|
* @ctx: the audit_context
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns the context's loginuid or -1 if @ctx is NULL.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
uid_t audit_get_loginuid(struct audit_context *ctx)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return ctx ? ctx->loginuid : -1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-14 03:47:11 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* audit_ipc_perms - record audit data for ipc
|
|
|
|
* @qbytes: msgq bytes
|
|
|
|
* @uid: msgq user id
|
|
|
|
* @gid: msgq group id
|
|
|
|
* @mode: msgq mode (permissions)
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns 0 for success or NULL context or < 0 on error.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
int audit_ipc_perms(unsigned long qbytes, uid_t uid, gid_t gid, mode_t mode)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct audit_aux_data_ipcctl *ax;
|
|
|
|
struct audit_context *context = current->audit_context;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (likely(!context))
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ax = kmalloc(sizeof(*ax), GFP_KERNEL);
|
|
|
|
if (!ax)
|
|
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ax->qbytes = qbytes;
|
|
|
|
ax->uid = uid;
|
|
|
|
ax->gid = gid;
|
|
|
|
ax->mode = mode;
|
|
|
|
|
2005-05-14 01:17:42 +08:00
|
|
|
ax->d.type = AUDIT_IPC;
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
ax->d.next = context->aux;
|
|
|
|
context->aux = (void *)ax;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2005-05-06 19:38:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-14 03:47:11 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* audit_socketcall - record audit data for sys_socketcall
|
|
|
|
* @nargs: number of args
|
|
|
|
* @args: args array
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns 0 for success or NULL context or < 0 on error.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2005-05-17 19:08:48 +08:00
|
|
|
int audit_socketcall(int nargs, unsigned long *args)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct audit_aux_data_socketcall *ax;
|
|
|
|
struct audit_context *context = current->audit_context;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (likely(!context))
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ax = kmalloc(sizeof(*ax) + nargs * sizeof(unsigned long), GFP_KERNEL);
|
|
|
|
if (!ax)
|
|
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ax->nargs = nargs;
|
|
|
|
memcpy(ax->args, args, nargs * sizeof(unsigned long));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ax->d.type = AUDIT_SOCKETCALL;
|
|
|
|
ax->d.next = context->aux;
|
|
|
|
context->aux = (void *)ax;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-14 03:47:11 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* audit_sockaddr - record audit data for sys_bind, sys_connect, sys_sendto
|
|
|
|
* @len: data length in user space
|
|
|
|
* @a: data address in kernel space
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns 0 for success or NULL context or < 0 on error.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2005-05-17 19:08:48 +08:00
|
|
|
int audit_sockaddr(int len, void *a)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct audit_aux_data_sockaddr *ax;
|
|
|
|
struct audit_context *context = current->audit_context;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (likely(!context))
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ax = kmalloc(sizeof(*ax) + len, GFP_KERNEL);
|
|
|
|
if (!ax)
|
|
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ax->len = len;
|
|
|
|
memcpy(ax->a, a, len);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ax->d.type = AUDIT_SOCKADDR;
|
|
|
|
ax->d.next = context->aux;
|
|
|
|
context->aux = (void *)ax;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-14 03:47:11 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* audit_avc_path - record the granting or denial of permissions
|
|
|
|
* @dentry: dentry to record
|
|
|
|
* @mnt: mnt to record
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns 0 for success or NULL context or < 0 on error.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Called from security/selinux/avc.c::avc_audit()
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2005-05-21 07:15:52 +08:00
|
|
|
int audit_avc_path(struct dentry *dentry, struct vfsmount *mnt)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct audit_aux_data_path *ax;
|
|
|
|
struct audit_context *context = current->audit_context;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (likely(!context))
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ax = kmalloc(sizeof(*ax), GFP_ATOMIC);
|
|
|
|
if (!ax)
|
|
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ax->dentry = dget(dentry);
|
|
|
|
ax->mnt = mntget(mnt);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ax->d.type = AUDIT_AVC_PATH;
|
|
|
|
ax->d.next = context->aux;
|
|
|
|
context->aux = (void *)ax;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-14 03:47:11 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* audit_signal_info - record signal info for shutting down audit subsystem
|
|
|
|
* @sig: signal value
|
|
|
|
* @t: task being signaled
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* If the audit subsystem is being terminated, record the task (pid)
|
|
|
|
* and uid that is doing that.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2005-05-06 19:38:39 +08:00
|
|
|
void audit_signal_info(int sig, struct task_struct *t)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
extern pid_t audit_sig_pid;
|
|
|
|
extern uid_t audit_sig_uid;
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-14 05:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
if (unlikely(audit_pid && t->tgid == audit_pid)) {
|
2005-05-06 19:38:39 +08:00
|
|
|
if (sig == SIGTERM || sig == SIGHUP) {
|
|
|
|
struct audit_context *ctx = current->audit_context;
|
|
|
|
audit_sig_pid = current->pid;
|
|
|
|
if (ctx)
|
|
|
|
audit_sig_uid = ctx->loginuid;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
audit_sig_uid = current->uid;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|