libbpf: fix SIGSEGV when BTF loading fails, but .BTF.ext exists
In case when BTF loading fails despite sanitization, but BPF object has .BTF.ext loaded as well, we free and null obj->btf, but not obj->btf_ext. This leads to an attempt to relocate .BTF.ext later on during bpf_object__load(), which assumes obj->btf is present. This leads to SIGSEGV on null pointer access. Fix bug by freeing and nulling obj->btf_ext as well. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8d650cdeda
commit
04efe5911f
|
@ -1500,6 +1500,12 @@ static int bpf_object__sanitize_and_load_btf(struct bpf_object *obj)
|
|||
BTF_ELF_SEC, err);
|
||||
btf__free(obj->btf);
|
||||
obj->btf = NULL;
|
||||
/* btf_ext can't exist without btf, so free it as well */
|
||||
if (obj->btf_ext) {
|
||||
btf_ext__free(obj->btf_ext);
|
||||
obj->btf_ext = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (bpf_object__is_btf_mandatory(obj))
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue