mm/hugetlb: fix getting refcount 0 page in hugetlb_fault()
When running the test which causes the race as shown in the previous patch,
we can hit the BUG "get_page() on refcount 0 page" in hugetlb_fault().
This race happens when pte turns into migration entry just after the first
check of is_hugetlb_entry_migration() in hugetlb_fault() passed with false.
To fix this, we need to check pte_present() again after huge_ptep_get().
This patch also reorders taking ptl and doing pte_page(), because
pte_page() should be done in ptl. Due to this reordering, we need use
trylock_page() in page != pagecache_page case to respect locking order.
Fixes: 66aebce747
("hugetlb: fix race condition in hugetlb_fault()")
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [3.2+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e66f17ff71
commit
0f792cf949
58
mm/hugetlb.c
58
mm/hugetlb.c
|
@ -3134,6 +3134,7 @@ int hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
|
|||
struct page *pagecache_page = NULL;
|
||||
struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(vma);
|
||||
struct address_space *mapping;
|
||||
int need_wait_lock = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
address &= huge_page_mask(h);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -3171,6 +3172,16 @@ int hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
|
|||
|
||||
ret = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* entry could be a migration/hwpoison entry at this point, so this
|
||||
* check prevents the kernel from going below assuming that we have
|
||||
* a active hugepage in pagecache. This goto expects the 2nd page fault,
|
||||
* and is_hugetlb_entry_(migration|hwpoisoned) check will properly
|
||||
* handle it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!pte_present(entry))
|
||||
goto out_mutex;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we are going to COW the mapping later, we examine the pending
|
||||
* reservations for this page now. This will ensure that any
|
||||
|
@ -3190,30 +3201,31 @@ int hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
|
|||
vma, address);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* hugetlb_cow() requires page locks of pte_page(entry) and
|
||||
* pagecache_page, so here we need take the former one
|
||||
* when page != pagecache_page or !pagecache_page.
|
||||
* Note that locking order is always pagecache_page -> page,
|
||||
* so no worry about deadlock.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
page = pte_page(entry);
|
||||
get_page(page);
|
||||
if (page != pagecache_page)
|
||||
lock_page(page);
|
||||
ptl = huge_pte_lock(h, mm, ptep);
|
||||
|
||||
ptl = huge_pte_lockptr(h, mm, ptep);
|
||||
spin_lock(ptl);
|
||||
/* Check for a racing update before calling hugetlb_cow */
|
||||
if (unlikely(!pte_same(entry, huge_ptep_get(ptep))))
|
||||
goto out_ptl;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* hugetlb_cow() requires page locks of pte_page(entry) and
|
||||
* pagecache_page, so here we need take the former one
|
||||
* when page != pagecache_page or !pagecache_page.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
page = pte_page(entry);
|
||||
if (page != pagecache_page)
|
||||
if (!trylock_page(page)) {
|
||||
need_wait_lock = 1;
|
||||
goto out_ptl;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
get_page(page);
|
||||
|
||||
if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) {
|
||||
if (!huge_pte_write(entry)) {
|
||||
ret = hugetlb_cow(mm, vma, address, ptep, entry,
|
||||
pagecache_page, ptl);
|
||||
goto out_ptl;
|
||||
goto out_put_page;
|
||||
}
|
||||
entry = huge_pte_mkdirty(entry);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -3221,7 +3233,10 @@ int hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
|
|||
if (huge_ptep_set_access_flags(vma, address, ptep, entry,
|
||||
flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE))
|
||||
update_mmu_cache(vma, address, ptep);
|
||||
|
||||
out_put_page:
|
||||
if (page != pagecache_page)
|
||||
unlock_page(page);
|
||||
put_page(page);
|
||||
out_ptl:
|
||||
spin_unlock(ptl);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -3229,12 +3244,17 @@ int hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
|
|||
unlock_page(pagecache_page);
|
||||
put_page(pagecache_page);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (page != pagecache_page)
|
||||
unlock_page(page);
|
||||
put_page(page);
|
||||
|
||||
out_mutex:
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&htlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Generally it's safe to hold refcount during waiting page lock. But
|
||||
* here we just wait to defer the next page fault to avoid busy loop and
|
||||
* the page is not used after unlocked before returning from the current
|
||||
* page fault. So we are safe from accessing freed page, even if we wait
|
||||
* here without taking refcount.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (need_wait_lock)
|
||||
wait_on_page_locked(page);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue