fix copy_tree() regression
Since 3.14 we had copy_tree() get the shadowing wrong - if we had one vfsmount shadowing another (i.e. if A is a slave of B, C is mounted on A/foo, then D got mounted on B/foo creating D' on A/foo shadowed by C), copy_tree() of A would make a copy of D' shadow the the copy of C, not the other way around. It's easy to fix, fortunately - just make sure that mount follows the one that shadows it in mnt_child as well as in mnt_hash, and when copy_tree() decides to attach a new mount, check if the last child it has added to the same parent should be shadowing the new one. And if it should, just use the same logics commit_tree() has - put the new mount into the hash and children lists right after the one that should shadow it. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [3.14 and later] Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
60bb45297f
commit
12a5b5294c
|
@ -778,6 +778,20 @@ static void attach_mnt(struct mount *mnt,
|
|||
list_add_tail(&mnt->mnt_child, &parent->mnt_mounts);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void attach_shadowed(struct mount *mnt,
|
||||
struct mount *parent,
|
||||
struct mount *shadows)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (shadows) {
|
||||
hlist_add_after_rcu(&shadows->mnt_hash, &mnt->mnt_hash);
|
||||
list_add(&mnt->mnt_child, &shadows->mnt_child);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
hlist_add_head_rcu(&mnt->mnt_hash,
|
||||
m_hash(&parent->mnt, mnt->mnt_mountpoint));
|
||||
list_add_tail(&mnt->mnt_child, &parent->mnt_mounts);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* vfsmount lock must be held for write
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
@ -796,12 +810,7 @@ static void commit_tree(struct mount *mnt, struct mount *shadows)
|
|||
|
||||
list_splice(&head, n->list.prev);
|
||||
|
||||
if (shadows)
|
||||
hlist_add_after_rcu(&shadows->mnt_hash, &mnt->mnt_hash);
|
||||
else
|
||||
hlist_add_head_rcu(&mnt->mnt_hash,
|
||||
m_hash(&parent->mnt, mnt->mnt_mountpoint));
|
||||
list_add_tail(&mnt->mnt_child, &parent->mnt_mounts);
|
||||
attach_shadowed(mnt, parent, shadows);
|
||||
touch_mnt_namespace(n);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1474,6 +1483,7 @@ struct mount *copy_tree(struct mount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry,
|
|||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
for (s = r; s; s = next_mnt(s, r)) {
|
||||
struct mount *t = NULL;
|
||||
if (!(flag & CL_COPY_UNBINDABLE) &&
|
||||
IS_MNT_UNBINDABLE(s)) {
|
||||
s = skip_mnt_tree(s);
|
||||
|
@ -1495,7 +1505,14 @@ struct mount *copy_tree(struct mount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry,
|
|||
goto out;
|
||||
lock_mount_hash();
|
||||
list_add_tail(&q->mnt_list, &res->mnt_list);
|
||||
attach_mnt(q, parent, p->mnt_mp);
|
||||
mnt_set_mountpoint(parent, p->mnt_mp, q);
|
||||
if (!list_empty(&parent->mnt_mounts)) {
|
||||
t = list_last_entry(&parent->mnt_mounts,
|
||||
struct mount, mnt_child);
|
||||
if (t->mnt_mp != p->mnt_mp)
|
||||
t = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
attach_shadowed(q, parent, t);
|
||||
unlock_mount_hash();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue