apparmor: Fix regression in profile conflict logic
The intended behaviour in apparmor profile matching is to flag a
conflict if two profiles match equally well. However, right now a
conflict is generated if another profile has the same match length even
if that profile doesn't actually match. Fix the logic so we only
generate a conflict if the profiles match.
Fixes: 844b8292b6
("apparmor: ensure that undecidable profile attachments fail")
Cc: Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0dda0b3fb2
commit
1a3881d305
|
@ -330,10 +330,7 @@ static struct aa_profile *__attach_match(const char *name,
|
||||||
continue;
|
continue;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (profile->xmatch) {
|
if (profile->xmatch) {
|
||||||
if (profile->xmatch_len == len) {
|
if (profile->xmatch_len >= len) {
|
||||||
conflict = true;
|
|
||||||
continue;
|
|
||||||
} else if (profile->xmatch_len > len) {
|
|
||||||
unsigned int state;
|
unsigned int state;
|
||||||
u32 perm;
|
u32 perm;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -342,6 +339,10 @@ static struct aa_profile *__attach_match(const char *name,
|
||||||
perm = dfa_user_allow(profile->xmatch, state);
|
perm = dfa_user_allow(profile->xmatch, state);
|
||||||
/* any accepting state means a valid match. */
|
/* any accepting state means a valid match. */
|
||||||
if (perm & MAY_EXEC) {
|
if (perm & MAY_EXEC) {
|
||||||
|
if (profile->xmatch_len == len) {
|
||||||
|
conflict = true;
|
||||||
|
continue;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
candidate = profile;
|
candidate = profile;
|
||||||
len = profile->xmatch_len;
|
len = profile->xmatch_len;
|
||||||
conflict = false;
|
conflict = false;
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue