ACPI/PCI: pci_link: use extended_irq union member when setting ext-irq shareable
The case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_EXTENDED_IRQ inside acpi_pci_link_set() is correctly using resource->res.data.extended_irq.foo for most settings, but for the shareable setting it so far has accidentally been using resource->res.data.irq.shareable instead of resource->res.data.extended_irq.shareable. Note that the old code happens to also work because the shareable field offset is the same for both the acpi_resource_irq and acpi_resource_extended_irq structs. Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ae83d0b416
commit
1c5e1cdd7c
|
@ -322,10 +322,10 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_set(struct acpi_pci_link *link, int irq)
|
|||
resource->res.data.extended_irq.polarity =
|
||||
link->irq.polarity;
|
||||
if (link->irq.triggering == ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE)
|
||||
resource->res.data.irq.shareable =
|
||||
resource->res.data.extended_irq.shareable =
|
||||
ACPI_EXCLUSIVE;
|
||||
else
|
||||
resource->res.data.irq.shareable = ACPI_SHARED;
|
||||
resource->res.data.extended_irq.shareable = ACPI_SHARED;
|
||||
resource->res.data.extended_irq.interrupt_count = 1;
|
||||
resource->res.data.extended_irq.interrupts[0] = irq;
|
||||
/* ignore resource_source, it's optional */
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue