x86,static_call: Fix __static_call_return0 for i386
Paolo reported that the instruction sequence that is used to replace:
call __static_call_return0
namely:
66 66 48 31 c0 data16 data16 xor %rax,%rax
decodes to something else on i386, namely:
66 66 48 data16 dec %ax
31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
Which is a nonsensical sequence that happens to have the same outcome.
*However* an important distinction is that it consists of 2
instructions which is a problem when the thing needs to be overwriten
with a regular call instruction again.
As such, replace the instruction with something that decodes the same
on both i386 and x86_64.
Fixes: 3f2a8fc4b1
("static_call/x86: Add __static_call_return0()")
Reported-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220318204419.GT8939@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net
This commit is contained in:
parent
3123109284
commit
1cd5f059d9
|
@ -12,10 +12,9 @@ enum insn_type {
|
|||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* data16 data16 xorq %rax, %rax - a single 5 byte instruction that clears %rax
|
||||
* The REX.W cancels the effect of any data16.
|
||||
* cs cs cs xorl %eax, %eax - a single 5 byte instruction that clears %[er]ax
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static const u8 xor5rax[] = { 0x66, 0x66, 0x48, 0x31, 0xc0 };
|
||||
static const u8 xor5rax[] = { 0x2e, 0x2e, 0x2e, 0x31, 0xc0 };
|
||||
|
||||
static const u8 retinsn[] = { RET_INSN_OPCODE, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc };
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue