rxrpc: Be consistent about switch value in rxrpc_send_call_packet()
rxrpc_send_call_packet() should use type in both its switch-statements rather than using pkt->whdr.type. This might give the compiler an easier job of uninitialised variable checking. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
27d0fc431c
commit
2311e327cd
|
@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ int rxrpc_send_call_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call, u8 type)
|
|||
&msg, iov, ioc, len);
|
||||
|
||||
if (ret < 0 && call->state < RXRPC_CALL_COMPLETE) {
|
||||
switch (pkt->whdr.type) {
|
||||
switch (type) {
|
||||
case RXRPC_PACKET_TYPE_ACK:
|
||||
rxrpc_propose_ACK(call, pkt->ack.reason,
|
||||
ntohs(pkt->ack.maxSkew),
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue