locking/rwsem, security/apparmor: Replace homebrew use of write_can_lock() with lockdep
The lockdep subsystem provides a robust way to assert that a lock is held, so use that instead of write_can_lock, which can give incorrect results for qrwlocks. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1507055129-12300-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0dc208b5d5
commit
26c4eb192c
|
@ -19,17 +19,6 @@
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#include "match.h"
|
#include "match.h"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Provide our own test for whether a write lock is held for asserts
|
|
||||||
* this is because on none SMP systems write_can_lock will always
|
|
||||||
* resolve to true, which is what you want for code making decisions
|
|
||||||
* based on it, but wrong for asserts checking that the lock is held
|
|
||||||
*/
|
|
||||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
|
||||||
#define write_is_locked(X) !write_can_lock(X)
|
|
||||||
#else
|
|
||||||
#define write_is_locked(X) (1)
|
|
||||||
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* DEBUG remains global (no per profile flag) since it is mostly used in sysctl
|
* DEBUG remains global (no per profile flag) since it is mostly used in sysctl
|
||||||
* which is not related to profile accesses.
|
* which is not related to profile accesses.
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ void __aa_proxy_redirect(struct aa_label *orig, struct aa_label *new)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
AA_BUG(!orig);
|
AA_BUG(!orig);
|
||||||
AA_BUG(!new);
|
AA_BUG(!new);
|
||||||
AA_BUG(!write_is_locked(&labels_set(orig)->lock));
|
lockdep_assert_held_exclusive(&labels_set(orig)->lock);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
tmp = rcu_dereference_protected(orig->proxy->label,
|
tmp = rcu_dereference_protected(orig->proxy->label,
|
||||||
&labels_ns(orig)->lock);
|
&labels_ns(orig)->lock);
|
||||||
|
@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ static bool __label_remove(struct aa_label *label, struct aa_label *new)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
AA_BUG(!ls);
|
AA_BUG(!ls);
|
||||||
AA_BUG(!label);
|
AA_BUG(!label);
|
||||||
AA_BUG(!write_is_locked(&ls->lock));
|
lockdep_assert_held_exclusive(&ls->lock);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (new)
|
if (new)
|
||||||
__aa_proxy_redirect(label, new);
|
__aa_proxy_redirect(label, new);
|
||||||
|
@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ static bool __label_replace(struct aa_label *old, struct aa_label *new)
|
||||||
AA_BUG(!ls);
|
AA_BUG(!ls);
|
||||||
AA_BUG(!old);
|
AA_BUG(!old);
|
||||||
AA_BUG(!new);
|
AA_BUG(!new);
|
||||||
AA_BUG(!write_is_locked(&ls->lock));
|
lockdep_assert_held_exclusive(&ls->lock);
|
||||||
AA_BUG(new->flags & FLAG_IN_TREE);
|
AA_BUG(new->flags & FLAG_IN_TREE);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!label_is_stale(old))
|
if (!label_is_stale(old))
|
||||||
|
@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ static struct aa_label *__label_insert(struct aa_labelset *ls,
|
||||||
AA_BUG(!ls);
|
AA_BUG(!ls);
|
||||||
AA_BUG(!label);
|
AA_BUG(!label);
|
||||||
AA_BUG(labels_set(label) != ls);
|
AA_BUG(labels_set(label) != ls);
|
||||||
AA_BUG(!write_is_locked(&ls->lock));
|
lockdep_assert_held_exclusive(&ls->lock);
|
||||||
AA_BUG(label->flags & FLAG_IN_TREE);
|
AA_BUG(label->flags & FLAG_IN_TREE);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Figure out where to put new node */
|
/* Figure out where to put new node */
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue