x86/boot/KASLR: Rename process_e820_entry() into process_mem_region()
Now process_e820_entry() is not limited to e820 entry processing, rename it to process_mem_region(). And adjust the code comment accordingly. Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com Cc: izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com Cc: matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Cc: thgarnie@google.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1499603862-11516-4-git-send-email-bhe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
87891b01b5
commit
27aac20574
|
@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ static unsigned long slots_fetch_random(void)
|
|||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void process_e820_entry(struct mem_vector *entry,
|
||||
static void process_mem_region(struct mem_vector *entry,
|
||||
unsigned long minimum,
|
||||
unsigned long image_size)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ static void process_e820_entry(struct mem_vector *entry,
|
|||
/* Potentially raise address to meet alignment needs. */
|
||||
region.start = ALIGN(region.start, CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Did we raise the address above this e820 region? */
|
||||
/* Did we raise the address above the passed in memory entry? */
|
||||
if (region.start > cur_entry.start + cur_entry.size)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ static void process_e820_entries(unsigned long minimum,
|
|||
continue;
|
||||
region.start = entry->addr;
|
||||
region.size = entry->size;
|
||||
process_e820_entry(®ion, minimum, image_size);
|
||||
process_mem_region(®ion, minimum, image_size);
|
||||
if (slot_area_index == MAX_SLOT_AREA) {
|
||||
debug_putstr("Aborted e820 scan (slot_areas full)!\n");
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue