thermal: rockchip: use the usleep_range instead of udelay
Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt recommends to use usleep_range on delays > 10usec. The usleep_range indeed reduces CPU load, since the udelay will busy wait for enough loop cycles to achieve the desired delay. Fixes commit b06c52db39fd ("thermal: rockchip: handle the power sequence for tsadc controller"). Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Suggested-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
678065d5b7
commit
2fe5c1b045
|
@ -547,10 +547,10 @@ static void rk_tsadcv3_initialize(struct regmap *grf, void __iomem *regs,
|
|||
regmap_write(grf, GRF_TSADC_TESTBIT_L, GRF_TSADC_TSEN_PD_ON);
|
||||
mdelay(10);
|
||||
regmap_write(grf, GRF_TSADC_TESTBIT_L, GRF_TSADC_TSEN_PD_OFF);
|
||||
udelay(100); /* The spec note says at least 15 us */
|
||||
usleep_range(15, 100); /* The spec note says at least 15 us */
|
||||
regmap_write(grf, GRF_SARADC_TESTBIT, GRF_SARADC_TESTBIT_ON);
|
||||
regmap_write(grf, GRF_TSADC_TESTBIT_H, GRF_TSADC_TESTBIT_H_ON);
|
||||
udelay(200); /* The spec note says at least 90 us */
|
||||
usleep_range(90, 200); /* The spec note says at least 90 us */
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (tshut_polarity == TSHUT_HIGH_ACTIVE)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue