bpf: Fix request_sock leak in sk lookup helpers
A customer reported a request_socket leak in a Calico cloud environment. We found that a BPF program was doing a socket lookup with takes a refcnt on the socket and that it was finding the request_socket but returning the parent LISTEN socket via sk_to_full_sk() without decrementing the child request socket 1st, resulting in request_sock slab object leak. This patch retains the existing behaviour of returning full socks to the caller but it also decrements the child request_socket if one is present before doing so to prevent the leak. Thanks to Curtis Taylor for all the help in diagnosing and testing this. And thanks to Antoine Tenart for the reproducer and patch input. v2 of this patch contains, refactor as per Daniel Borkmann's suggestions to validate RCU flags on the listen socket so that it balances with bpf_sk_release() and update comments as per Martin KaFai Lau's suggestion. One small change to Daniels suggestion, put "sk = sk2" under "if (sk2 != sk)" to avoid an extra instruction. Fixes:f7355a6c04
("bpf: Check sk_fullsock() before returning from bpf_sk_lookup()") Fixes:edbf8c01de
("bpf: add skc_lookup_tcp helper") Co-developed-by: Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jon Maxwell <jmaxwell37@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Tested-by: Curtis Taylor <cutaylor-pub@yahoo.com> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/56d6f898-bde0-bb25-3427-12a330b29fb8@iogearbox.net Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220615011540.813025-1-jmaxwell37@gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
a6e944f25c
commit
3046a82731
|
@ -6516,11 +6516,22 @@ __bpf_sk_lookup(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bpf_sock_tuple *tuple, u32 len,
|
|||
ifindex, proto, netns_id, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
if (sk) {
|
||||
sk = sk_to_full_sk(sk);
|
||||
if (!sk_fullsock(sk)) {
|
||||
struct sock *sk2 = sk_to_full_sk(sk);
|
||||
|
||||
/* sk_to_full_sk() may return (sk)->rsk_listener, so make sure the original sk
|
||||
* sock refcnt is decremented to prevent a request_sock leak.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!sk_fullsock(sk2))
|
||||
sk2 = NULL;
|
||||
if (sk2 != sk) {
|
||||
sock_gen_put(sk);
|
||||
/* Ensure there is no need to bump sk2 refcnt */
|
||||
if (unlikely(sk2 && !sock_flag(sk2, SOCK_RCU_FREE))) {
|
||||
WARN_ONCE(1, "Found non-RCU, unreferenced socket!");
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
sk = sk2;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return sk;
|
||||
|
@ -6553,11 +6564,22 @@ bpf_sk_lookup(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bpf_sock_tuple *tuple, u32 len,
|
|||
flags);
|
||||
|
||||
if (sk) {
|
||||
sk = sk_to_full_sk(sk);
|
||||
if (!sk_fullsock(sk)) {
|
||||
struct sock *sk2 = sk_to_full_sk(sk);
|
||||
|
||||
/* sk_to_full_sk() may return (sk)->rsk_listener, so make sure the original sk
|
||||
* sock refcnt is decremented to prevent a request_sock leak.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!sk_fullsock(sk2))
|
||||
sk2 = NULL;
|
||||
if (sk2 != sk) {
|
||||
sock_gen_put(sk);
|
||||
/* Ensure there is no need to bump sk2 refcnt */
|
||||
if (unlikely(sk2 && !sock_flag(sk2, SOCK_RCU_FREE))) {
|
||||
WARN_ONCE(1, "Found non-RCU, unreferenced socket!");
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
sk = sk2;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return sk;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue