blk-wbt: use BLK_STAT_{READ,WRITE} instead of 0/1

Since we have proper enums for the stats directions, use them.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jens Axboe 2016-11-11 08:23:53 -07:00
parent 8054b89f8f
commit 382cf633ed
1 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -255,8 +255,8 @@ static bool inline stat_sample_valid(struct blk_rq_stat *stat)
* that it's writes impacting us, and not just some sole read on
* a device that is in a lower power state.
*/
return stat[0].nr_samples >= 1 &&
stat[1].nr_samples >= RWB_MIN_WRITE_SAMPLES;
return stat[BLK_STAT_READ].nr_samples >= 1 &&
stat[BLK_STAT_WRITE].nr_samples >= RWB_MIN_WRITE_SAMPLES;
}
static u64 rwb_sync_issue_lat(struct rq_wb *rwb)
@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int __latency_exceeded(struct rq_wb *rwb, struct blk_rq_stat *stat)
*/
thislat = rwb_sync_issue_lat(rwb);
if (thislat > rwb->cur_win_nsec ||
(thislat > rwb->min_lat_nsec && !stat[0].nr_samples)) {
(thislat > rwb->min_lat_nsec && !stat[BLK_STAT_READ].nr_samples)) {
trace_wbt_lat(bdi, thislat);
return LAT_EXCEEDED;
}
@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static int __latency_exceeded(struct rq_wb *rwb, struct blk_rq_stat *stat)
* waited or still has writes in flights, consider us doing
* just writes as well.
*/
if ((stat[1].nr_samples && blk_stat_is_current(stat)) ||
if ((stat[BLK_STAT_WRITE].nr_samples && blk_stat_is_current(stat)) ||
wb_recent_wait(rwb) || wbt_inflight(rwb))
return LAT_UNKNOWN_WRITES;
return LAT_UNKNOWN;
@ -317,8 +317,8 @@ static int __latency_exceeded(struct rq_wb *rwb, struct blk_rq_stat *stat)
/*
* If the 'min' latency exceeds our target, step down.
*/
if (stat[0].min > rwb->min_lat_nsec) {
trace_wbt_lat(bdi, stat[0].min);
if (stat[BLK_STAT_READ].min > rwb->min_lat_nsec) {
trace_wbt_lat(bdi, stat[BLK_STAT_READ].min);
trace_wbt_stat(bdi, stat);
return LAT_EXCEEDED;
}