of: property: Fix the semantics of of_is_ancestor_of()
The of_is_ancestor_of() function was renamed from of_link_is_valid()
based on review feedback. The rename meant the semantics of the function
had to be inverted, but this was missed in the earlier patch.
So, fix the semantics of of_is_ancestor_of() and invert the conditional
expressions where it is used.
Fixes: a3e1d1a7f5
("of: property: Add functional dependency link from DT bindings")
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191120080230.16007-1-saravanak@google.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
60774d2af0
commit
3883539140
|
@ -993,11 +993,11 @@ static bool of_is_ancestor_of(struct device_node *test_ancestor,
|
|||
while (child) {
|
||||
if (child == test_ancestor) {
|
||||
of_node_put(child);
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
child = of_get_next_parent(child);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ static int of_link_to_phandle(struct device *dev, struct device_node *sup_np,
|
|||
* descendant nodes. By definition, a child node can't be a functional
|
||||
* dependency for the parent node.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!of_is_ancestor_of(dev->of_node, sup_np)) {
|
||||
if (of_is_ancestor_of(dev->of_node, sup_np)) {
|
||||
dev_dbg(dev, "Not linking to %pOFP - is descendant\n", sup_np);
|
||||
of_node_put(sup_np);
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue