p71924506
/
linux_old1
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fs, jbd: use a more generic hash function 

While the hash function used by the revoke hashtable is good somewhere else,
it's not really good here.

The default hash shift (8) means that one third of the hashing function
gets lost (and is undefined anyways (8 - 12 = negative shift)):

	"(block << (hash_shift - 12))) & (table->hash_size - 1)"

Instead, just use the kernel's generic hash function that gets used everywhere
else.

Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
This commit is contained in:
Sasha Levin 2014-10-21 16:43:55 -04:00 committed by Jan Kara
parent 474d2605d1
commit 3c9cafe05f
1 changed files with 2 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
fs/jbd/revoke.c
View File

@ -93,6 +93,7 @@
#include <linux/bio.h>
#endif
#include <linux/log2.h>
#include <linux/hash.h>
static struct kmem_cache *revoke_record_cache;
static struct kmem_cache *revoke_table_cache;
@ -129,15 +130,11 @@ static void flush_descriptor(journal_t *, struct journal_head *, int, int);
/* Utility functions to maintain the revoke table */
/* Borrowed from buffer.c: this is a tried and tested block hash function */
static inline int hash(journal_t *journal, unsigned int block)
{
struct jbd_revoke_table_s *table = journal->j_revoke;
int hash_shift = table->hash_shift;
return ((block << (hash_shift - 6)) ^
(block >> 13) ^
(block << (hash_shift - 12))) & (table->hash_size - 1);
return hash_32(block, table->hash_shift);
}
static int insert_revoke_hash(journal_t *journal, unsigned int blocknr,