drm/i915: streamline hsw_pm_irq_handler
The if (pm_iir & ~GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS) check was redunandant. Otoh adding a check for rps events allows us to avoid the spinlock grabbing for VECS interrupts. v2: Drop misplaced hunk which now moved to the right patch. Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d0ecd7e221
commit
41a05a3a5c
|
@ -963,25 +963,23 @@ static void dp_aux_irq_handler(struct drm_device *dev)
|
|||
static void hsw_pm_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
|
||||
u32 pm_iir)
|
||||
{
|
||||
spin_lock(&dev_priv->rps.lock);
|
||||
dev_priv->rps.pm_iir |= pm_iir & GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS;
|
||||
if (dev_priv->rps.pm_iir) {
|
||||
if (pm_iir & GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS) {
|
||||
spin_lock(&dev_priv->rps.lock);
|
||||
dev_priv->rps.pm_iir |= pm_iir & GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS;
|
||||
I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMIMR, dev_priv->rps.pm_iir);
|
||||
/* never want to mask useful interrupts. (also posting read) */
|
||||
WARN_ON(I915_READ_NOTRACE(GEN6_PMIMR) & ~GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS);
|
||||
/* TODO: if queue_work is slow, move it out of the spinlock */
|
||||
queue_work(dev_priv->wq, &dev_priv->rps.work);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (pm_iir & ~GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS) {
|
||||
if (pm_iir & PM_VEBOX_USER_INTERRUPT)
|
||||
notify_ring(dev_priv->dev, &dev_priv->ring[VECS]);
|
||||
if (pm_iir & PM_VEBOX_USER_INTERRUPT)
|
||||
notify_ring(dev_priv->dev, &dev_priv->ring[VECS]);
|
||||
|
||||
if (pm_iir & PM_VEBOX_CS_ERROR_INTERRUPT) {
|
||||
DRM_ERROR("VEBOX CS error interrupt 0x%08x\n", pm_iir);
|
||||
i915_handle_error(dev_priv->dev, false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (pm_iir & PM_VEBOX_CS_ERROR_INTERRUPT) {
|
||||
DRM_ERROR("VEBOX CS error interrupt 0x%08x\n", pm_iir);
|
||||
i915_handle_error(dev_priv->dev, false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue