iwlwifi: dvm: don't enable CTS to self
We should always prefer to use full RTS protection. Using CTS to self gives a meaningless improvement, but this flow is much harder for the firmware which is likely to have issues with it. CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e48393e8cf
commit
43d826ca59
|
@ -1068,13 +1068,6 @@ int iwlagn_commit_rxon(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct iwl_rxon_context *ctx)
|
||||||
/* recalculate basic rates */
|
/* recalculate basic rates */
|
||||||
iwl_calc_basic_rates(priv, ctx);
|
iwl_calc_basic_rates(priv, ctx);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
|
||||||
* force CTS-to-self frames protection if RTS-CTS is not preferred
|
|
||||||
* one aggregation protection method
|
|
||||||
*/
|
|
||||||
if (!priv->hw_params.use_rts_for_aggregation)
|
|
||||||
ctx->staging.flags |= RXON_FLG_SELF_CTS_EN;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if ((ctx->vif && ctx->vif->bss_conf.use_short_slot) ||
|
if ((ctx->vif && ctx->vif->bss_conf.use_short_slot) ||
|
||||||
!(ctx->staging.flags & RXON_FLG_BAND_24G_MSK))
|
!(ctx->staging.flags & RXON_FLG_BAND_24G_MSK))
|
||||||
ctx->staging.flags |= RXON_FLG_SHORT_SLOT_MSK;
|
ctx->staging.flags |= RXON_FLG_SHORT_SLOT_MSK;
|
||||||
|
@ -1480,11 +1473,6 @@ void iwlagn_bss_info_changed(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
ctx->staging.flags &= ~RXON_FLG_TGG_PROTECT_MSK;
|
ctx->staging.flags &= ~RXON_FLG_TGG_PROTECT_MSK;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (bss_conf->use_cts_prot)
|
|
||||||
ctx->staging.flags |= RXON_FLG_SELF_CTS_EN;
|
|
||||||
else
|
|
||||||
ctx->staging.flags &= ~RXON_FLG_SELF_CTS_EN;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
memcpy(ctx->staging.bssid_addr, bss_conf->bssid, ETH_ALEN);
|
memcpy(ctx->staging.bssid_addr, bss_conf->bssid, ETH_ALEN);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (vif->type == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP ||
|
if (vif->type == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP ||
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue