x86/mm/numa: Remove numa_nodemask_from_meminfo()
numa_nodemask_from_meminfo() generates a nodemask of nodes which have memory according to a meminfo descriptor. The two callsites of that function both set bits in copies of the numa_nodes_parsed nodemask. In both cases, the information in supplied numa_meminfo is a subset of numa_nodes_parsed. So setting those bits again is not really necessary. Here are the three call paths which show that the supplied numa_meminfo argument describes memory regions in nodes which are already in numa_nodes_parsed: x86_numa_init() numa_init() Case 1: acpi_numa_init() acpi_parse_memory_affinity() numa_add_memblk() node_set(numa_nodes_parsed) acpi_parse_slit() acpi_numa_slit_init() numa_set_distance() numa_alloc_distance() numa_nodemask_from_meminfo() Case 2: amd_numa_init() numa_add_memblk() node_set(numa_nodes_parsed) Case 3 dummy_numa_init() node_set(numa_nodes_parsed) numa_add_memblk() numa_register_memblks() numa_nodemask_from_meminfo() Thus, in all three cases, the respective bit in numa_nodes_parsed is set, which means it is not necessary to set it again in a copy of numa_nodes_parsed. So remove that function. Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170314030801.13656-2-richard.weiyang@gmail.com [ Heavily massage commit message. ] Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
43dac8f6a7
commit
474aeffd88
|
@ -314,20 +314,6 @@ int __init numa_cleanup_meminfo(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
|
|||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Set nodes, which have memory in @mi, in *@nodemask.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void __init numa_nodemask_from_meminfo(nodemask_t *nodemask,
|
||||
const struct numa_meminfo *mi)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mi->blk); i++)
|
||||
if (mi->blk[i].start != mi->blk[i].end &&
|
||||
mi->blk[i].nid != NUMA_NO_NODE)
|
||||
node_set(mi->blk[i].nid, *nodemask);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* numa_reset_distance - Reset NUMA distance table
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
@ -347,16 +333,12 @@ void __init numa_reset_distance(void)
|
|||
|
||||
static int __init numa_alloc_distance(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
nodemask_t nodes_parsed;
|
||||
size_t size;
|
||||
int i, j, cnt = 0;
|
||||
u64 phys;
|
||||
|
||||
/* size the new table and allocate it */
|
||||
nodes_parsed = numa_nodes_parsed;
|
||||
numa_nodemask_from_meminfo(&nodes_parsed, &numa_meminfo);
|
||||
|
||||
for_each_node_mask(i, nodes_parsed)
|
||||
for_each_node_mask(i, numa_nodes_parsed)
|
||||
cnt = i;
|
||||
cnt++;
|
||||
size = cnt * cnt * sizeof(numa_distance[0]);
|
||||
|
@ -535,7 +517,6 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
|
|||
|
||||
/* Account for nodes with cpus and no memory */
|
||||
node_possible_map = numa_nodes_parsed;
|
||||
numa_nodemask_from_meminfo(&node_possible_map, mi);
|
||||
if (WARN_ON(nodes_empty(node_possible_map)))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue