ide: hpt366: mark expected switch fall-throughs
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that, in this particular case, I removed the "else: " part from the comment. As we are now using Warning level 3: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3, this is what GCC is expecting to find. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
adf040ddd0
commit
498b58944c
|
@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ static u8 hpt3xx_udma_filter(ide_drive_t *drive)
|
|||
if (!HPT370_ALLOW_ATA100_5 ||
|
||||
check_in_drive_list(drive, bad_ata100_5))
|
||||
return ATA_UDMA4;
|
||||
/* else: fall through */
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case HPT372 :
|
||||
case HPT372A:
|
||||
case HPT372N:
|
||||
|
@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ static u8 hpt3xx_mdma_filter(ide_drive_t *drive)
|
|||
case HPT374 :
|
||||
if (ata_id_is_sata(drive->id))
|
||||
return 0x00;
|
||||
/* else: fall through */
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
default:
|
||||
return 0x07;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue