sched/core: Streamle calls to task_rq_unlock()
Calls to task_rq_unlock() are done several times in the __sched_setscheduler() function. This is fine when only the rq lock needs to be handled but not so much when other locks come into play. This patch streamlines the release of the rq lock so that only one location need to be modified when dealing with more than one lock. No change of functionality is introduced by this patch. Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bristot@redhat.com Cc: claudio@evidence.eu.com Cc: lizefan@huawei.com Cc: longman@redhat.com Cc: luca.abeni@santannapisa.it Cc: tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190719140000.31694-3-juri.lelli@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c22645f4c8
commit
4b211f2b12
|
@ -4712,8 +4712,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
|
|||
* Changing the policy of the stop threads its a very bad idea:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (p == rq->stop) {
|
||||
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
retval = -EINVAL;
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -4731,8 +4731,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
|
|||
goto change;
|
||||
|
||||
p->sched_reset_on_fork = reset_on_fork;
|
||||
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
retval = 0;
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
change:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -4745,8 +4745,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
|
|||
if (rt_bandwidth_enabled() && rt_policy(policy) &&
|
||||
task_group(p)->rt_bandwidth.rt_runtime == 0 &&
|
||||
!task_group_is_autogroup(task_group(p))) {
|
||||
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
|
||||
return -EPERM;
|
||||
retval = -EPERM;
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
||||
|
@ -4761,8 +4761,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
|
|||
*/
|
||||
if (!cpumask_subset(span, p->cpus_ptr) ||
|
||||
rq->rd->dl_bw.bw == 0) {
|
||||
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
|
||||
return -EPERM;
|
||||
retval = -EPERM;
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
@ -4781,8 +4781,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
|
|||
* is available.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if ((dl_policy(policy) || dl_task(p)) && sched_dl_overflow(p, policy, attr)) {
|
||||
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
|
||||
return -EBUSY;
|
||||
retval = -EBUSY;
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
p->sched_reset_on_fork = reset_on_fork;
|
||||
|
@ -4840,6 +4840,10 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
|
|||
preempt_enable();
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
unlock:
|
||||
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
|
||||
return retval;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int _sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue