bpf: simplify __is_valid_access test on cb
The __is_valid_access() test for cb[] from62c7989b24
("bpf: allow b/h/w/dw access for bpf's cb in ctx") was done unnecessarily complex, we can just simplify it the same way as recent fix from2d071c643f
("bpf, trace: make ctx access checks more robust") did. Overflow can never happen as size is 1/2/4/8 depending on access. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
187024144c
commit
4faf940dd8
|
@ -2784,19 +2784,8 @@ static bool __is_valid_access(int off, int size)
|
|||
switch (off) {
|
||||
case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0]) ...
|
||||
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + sizeof(__u32) - 1:
|
||||
if (size == sizeof(__u16) &&
|
||||
off > offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + sizeof(__u16))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
if (size == sizeof(__u32) &&
|
||||
off > offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
if (size == sizeof(__u64) &&
|
||||
off > offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[2]))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
if (size != sizeof(__u8) &&
|
||||
size != sizeof(__u16) &&
|
||||
size != sizeof(__u32) &&
|
||||
size != sizeof(__u64))
|
||||
if (off + size >
|
||||
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + sizeof(__u32))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue