platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: Revert UNSUPPORTED_CMD back to an int
UNSUPPORTED_CMD was previously 0x80000000 (int), but commit819cddae7c
("platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: Clean up constants") changed it into an unsigned long due to BIT() being used to define it. As call_fext_func() returns an int, 0x80000000 would get type promoted when compared to an unsigned long, which on a 64-bit system would cause it to become 0xffffffff80000000 due to sign extension. This causes one logical condition in fujitsu-laptop to always be true and another one to always be false on 64-bit systems. Fix this by reverting UNSUPPORTED_CMD back to an int. This patch fixes the following smatch warnings: drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c:763 acpi_fujitsu_laptop_leds_register() warn: always true condition '(call_fext_func(device, ((1 << (12)) | (1 << (0))), 2, (1 << (16)), 0) != (1 << (31))) => (s32min-s32max != 2147483648)' drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c:816 acpi_fujitsu_laptop_add() warn: impossible condition '(priv->flags_supported == (1 << (31))) => (0-2147483647,18446744071562067968-u64max == 2147483648)' Fixes:819cddae7c
("platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: Clean up constants") Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Michał Kępień <kernel@kempniu.pl> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@just42.net> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart (VMware) <dvhart@infradead.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7129707ec2
commit
502ab004e6
|
@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
|
|||
#define FUNC_BACKLIGHT (BIT(12) | BIT(2))
|
||||
|
||||
/* FUNC interface - responses */
|
||||
#define UNSUPPORTED_CMD BIT(31)
|
||||
#define UNSUPPORTED_CMD 0x80000000
|
||||
|
||||
/* FUNC interface - status flags */
|
||||
#define FLAG_RFKILL BIT(5)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue