Revert "f2fs: enhance multi-threads performance"
This reports performance regression by Yuanhan Liu.
The basic idea was to reduce one-point mutex, but it turns out this causes
another contention like context swithes.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/21/11
Until finishing the analysis on this issue, I'd like to revert this for a while.
This reverts commit 78373b7319
.
This commit is contained in:
parent
5ebe6afaf0
commit
5463e7c18e
|
@ -1513,6 +1513,7 @@ static int f2fs_write_data_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
|
|||
{
|
||||
struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
|
||||
struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
|
||||
bool locked = false;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
long diff;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1533,7 +1534,13 @@ static int f2fs_write_data_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
|
|||
|
||||
diff = nr_pages_to_write(sbi, DATA, wbc);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
|
||||
mutex_lock(&sbi->writepages);
|
||||
locked = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
ret = write_cache_pages(mapping, wbc, __f2fs_writepage, mapping);
|
||||
if (locked)
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&sbi->writepages);
|
||||
|
||||
f2fs_submit_merged_bio(sbi, DATA, WRITE);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -625,6 +625,7 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
|
|||
struct mutex cp_mutex; /* checkpoint procedure lock */
|
||||
struct rw_semaphore cp_rwsem; /* blocking FS operations */
|
||||
struct rw_semaphore node_write; /* locking node writes */
|
||||
struct mutex writepages; /* mutex for writepages() */
|
||||
wait_queue_head_t cp_wait;
|
||||
|
||||
struct inode_management im[MAX_INO_ENTRY]; /* manage inode cache */
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1035,6 +1035,7 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
|
|||
sbi->raw_super = raw_super;
|
||||
sbi->raw_super_buf = raw_super_buf;
|
||||
mutex_init(&sbi->gc_mutex);
|
||||
mutex_init(&sbi->writepages);
|
||||
mutex_init(&sbi->cp_mutex);
|
||||
init_rwsem(&sbi->node_write);
|
||||
clear_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue