cifs: small underflow in cnvrtDosUnixTm()
January is month 1. There is no zero-th month. If someone passes a
zero month then it means we read from one space before the start of the
total_days_of_prev_months[] array.
We may as well also be strict about days as well.
Fixes: 1bd5bbcb65
("[CIFS] Legacy time handling for Win9x and OS/2 part 1")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
204f144c9f
commit
564277ecee
|
@ -980,10 +980,10 @@ struct timespec cnvrtDosUnixTm(__le16 le_date, __le16 le_time, int offset)
|
|||
cifs_dbg(VFS, "illegal hours %d\n", st->Hours);
|
||||
days = sd->Day;
|
||||
month = sd->Month;
|
||||
if ((days > 31) || (month > 12)) {
|
||||
if (days < 1 || days > 31 || month < 1 || month > 12) {
|
||||
cifs_dbg(VFS, "illegal date, month %d day: %d\n", month, days);
|
||||
if (month > 12)
|
||||
month = 12;
|
||||
days = clamp(days, 1, 31);
|
||||
month = clamp(month, 1, 12);
|
||||
}
|
||||
month -= 1;
|
||||
days += total_days_of_prev_months[month];
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue